Članak
jun 30
Nazad

DETERMINANTE ETIČKIH UVERENJA PRAVNIKA U SRBIJI

Miljan Savić

10.5937/AnaliPFB2002145S
SAŽETAK /

Ispitivanje etičkih uverenja sadašnjih i budućih članova advokatske profesije predstavlja važan korak ka adekvatnom definisanju i razumevanju faktora koji utiču na njihovo formiranje i promenu. U radu je predstavljena analiza etičkih uverenja različitih kategorija pravnika u Srbiji, korišćenjem faktorske analize (analize glavnih komponenti) na uzorku od 325 ispitanika, advokata, advokatskih pripravnika i studenata. Analiziran je uticaj socio–demografskih činilaca (pol, starost, pozicija i dužina radnog staža) na etička uverenja. Predstavljene su oblasti i pravila ponašanja uređena Kodeksom u odnosu na koje postoji najveća nesaglasnost između uverenja i propisanih pravila ponašanja. Najvažniji nalazi ukazuju da starost i radno iskustvo ispitanika direktno utiču na pooštravanje njihovih etičkih uverenja kada su u pitanju određeni tipovi neetičkih ponašanja.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici   Latinici  
REFERENCE /
  • Akman, Vedat. 2011. An Empirical Analysis of the Gender and Age Factors Effecting Ethical Perception of Lawyers in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science 2(16): 199–204.
  • Armstrong, Mary Beth. 1987. Moral Development and Accounting Education. Journal of Accounting Education 5(1): 27–43.
  • Bukvić, Aleksandar. 2007. Načela izrade psiholoških testova. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
  • Burbank, David D., Robert S. Duboff. 1974–1975. Ethics and the Legal Profession: a Survey of Boston Lawyers. Suffolk University Law Review 9: 66–117.
  • Cabrillo, Francisco, Sean Fitzpatrick. 2008. The Economics of Courts and Litigation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar Pub.
  • Charles, Jennifer L.K., Patrick V. Dattalo. 2018. Minimizing Social Desirability Bias in Measuring Sensitive Topics: The use of For­giving Language in Item Development. Journal of Social Service Research 44(4): 587–599.
  • Chung, Jane, Gary S. Monroe. 2003. Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44(4): 291–302.
  • Daicoff, Susan. 1996. (Oxymoron?) Ethical Decisionmaking by Attorneys: An Empirical Study. Florida Law Review 48: 197–261.
  • Dragićević, Čedomir. 2002. Statistika za psihologe. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
  • Draugalis, JoLaine R., Cecilia M. Plaza. 2009. Best practices for survey research reports revisited: implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate. American journal of phar­maceutical education 73(8): 1–3.
  • European Comission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). 2018. European judicial systems Eficiency and quality of justice. Stras­bourg: Printed at the Council of Europe.
  • Emerson Tisha L.N., Stephen J. Conroy, Charles W. Stanley. 2007. Ethical Attitudes of Accountants: recent Evidence from a Practitioners’ Survey. Journal of business Ethics 71: 73–87.
  • Etienne, Margareth. 2005. The Ethics of Cause Lawyering: An Empirical Examination of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Cause Lawyers. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95(4): 1195–1260.
  • Eynon, Gail, Nancey T. Hills, Kevin T. Stevens. 1997. Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 1297–1309.
  • Holmes, Vivien, Tony Foley, Stephen Tang, Margie Rowe. 2012. Prac­ticing Professionalism: Observations from an Empirical Study of New Australian Lawyers. Legal Ethics 15(1): 29–55.
  • Howitt, Denis, Duncan Cramer. 2011. Introduction to Statistics in Psy­chology. 5 ed., Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Koocher, Gerald P., Patricia Keith–Spiegel. 2016. Ethics in psychology and the Mental Health Professions. 4 ed., New York: Oxfort University Press.
  • McNeeley, Susan. 2012. Sensitive Issues in Surveys: Reducing Refusals While Increasing Reliability and Quality of Responses to Sensitive Survey Items. 377–396. u Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences, ed. Gideon Lior. New York: Springer.
  • Mrakovčić, Marko, Danilo Vuković. 2019. „Unutarnja“ kriza pravosuđa? Stavovi pripadnika pravničkih profesija o pravosuđu u Hrvatskoj i Srbiji. Politička misao 56(1): 75–105.
  • Nicolson, Donald. 2005. Making lawyers moral? Ethical codes and moral character. Legal Studies 25(4): 601–626.
  • Pepper, Stephen. 1999. Lawyers’ Ethics in the Gap between Law and Justice. South Texas Law Review 40: 181–205.
  • Perry, Gregory M., Patricia A. Duffy, Clair J. Nixon, Lindon J. Robinson. 2005. An Exploration of Factors Influencing Ethical and Unethical Behavior in Negotiations. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37: 1–20.
  • Perry, Joshua E., Ilene N. Moore, Bruce Barry, Ellen Wright Clayton, Amanda R. Carrico. 2009. The Ethical Health Lawyer: An Em­pirical Assessment of Moral Decision Making. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37(3): 461–475.
  • Petrović, Nikola M. 2013. Profesionalna etička uverenja i postupci kliničkih psihologa u Srbiji. Doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.
  • Pope, Kenneth S., Melba J. T. Vasquez. 2007. Ethics in Psychotherapy and Counseling: A Practical Guide. 4 ed., New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pope, Kenneth S., Barbara G. Tabachnick, Patricia Keith-Spiegel. 1987. Ethics of practice: The beliefs and behaviours of psychologists as therapists. American Psychologist 42(11): 993–1006.
  • Prentice, Robert A. 2015. Behavioral Ethics: Can It Help Lawyers (And Others) Be Their Best Selves? Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 29: 35–85.
  • Republika Srbija, Republički zavod za statistiku. 2019. Visoko obrazovanje 2018/2019. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.
  • Vuković, Danilo. 2019. Advokatura u Srbiji: rezultati empirijskog istraživanja. Branič 130(1–4)/2017: 103–113.
  • Vuković, Danilo, Valerija Dabetić, Samir Forić. Prihvaćeno za objav­ljivanje. Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, u Lawyers in Society – 30 Years Later, eds. Abel Richard et al. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • You, Di, Yukiko Maeda, Muriel J. Bebeau. 2011. Gender Difference in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis. Ethics & Behavior 21(4): 263–282.