Redakcija /
dr Marija Karanikić Mirić [glavni i odgovorni urednik]
Članovi / dr Dušan Popović, dr Bojan Milisavljević, dr Vojislav Stanimirović, dr Mirjana Drenovak Ivanović, dr Danilo Vuković, dr Svetislav Kostić
Urednik veb sajta / dr Boris Begović
Sekretari / dr Nikola Ilić i dr Novak Vujičić
Tehnički sekretari/ Ksenija Džipković i Vukašin Stanojlović
- Autor /
- Redakcija 2023. godine
- PRILOG /
Sadržaj
Autor /- 2023. godine Redakcija
- ČLANAK /
Digestive Jurisprudence Restated: On Breakfast and Digestion as Bias-Arousers“Digestive Jurisprudence” is the view that judicial decisions depend on what judges had for breakfast. The view is usually associated with Frank’s version of Legal Realism. The paper shows that, disputable as it is, that view comes from the philosophical background of Peirce’s pragmatism and the legal background of Holmes’ prediction theory. Peirce’s pragmatism was an account of concepts in terms of their predictable consequences. Holmes’ prediction theory was an account of law in terms of predictions of what judges will do. And Legal Realism focused on judicial behavior as determined by various factors including, in its most extreme and provocative version, breakfast quality and digestive processes. The paper does not ascertain whether the digestive view is true (to some extent); rather, it makes the working hypothesis that breakfast quality, or digestion quality, is not a sufficient condition of a certain outcome but, most likely, a bias-arouser.
Autor /- ČLANAK /
Canonical Jurisprudence in the Kingdom of Bohemia in the Middle AgesDuring the High and Late Middle Ages, canon law played a crucial role. This study provides an overview of ecclesiastical legal scholarship in the Czech lands, i.e. in Bohemia (in the Archdiocese of Prague) and in Moravia (in the Diocese of Olomouc). The development of a legal jurisprudence went hand in hand with the development of ecclesiastical administration in the second half of the 14th century and in the early 15th century, which evolved into a compact system. An important factor in this was the establishment of Prague University, including the Law Faculty, in 1348, and also, in particular, the establishment of the separate Prague Law University in 1372. Amongst the major canonists who left work behind were Štěpán of Roudnice, Bohuslav of Krnov, Kuneš of Třebovle, Mikuláš Puchník, and Jan of Jesenice, amongst others.
- ČLANAK /
Fidic Force Majeure Clause from the Viewpoint of Serbian LawThe purpose of this paper is to present force majeure as stipulated in FIDIC forms, which are nowadays frequently in use when negotiating the conclusion of construction contracts concerning major projects. An important remark is that these forms have been greatly influenced by common law systems where operation of force majeure is dependent on the contractual definition and wording of the clause. On the other hand, the Serbian Law on Obligations contains its own understanding of force majeure-related concept, which might be amended in accordance with the principle of party autonomy. The paper further aims to elaborate on this interplay between these FIDIC forms and Serbian law. The conclusion is that the FIDIC force majeure clause represents an important contribution to the domestic regime, which does not expressly address scenarios with temporary impediments, which is necessary for successful completion of construction works.
- ČLANAK /
Proširena Srbija: prilog razmišljanju o alternativnom državotvornom rešenju iz 1918. godineCilj rada je da ex post istraži državotvorne alternative uje dinjenju jugoslovenskih naroda iz 1918. godine i da razmotri da li bi one mogle da budu uspešnije od Jugoslavije sa stanovišta interesa srpskog naroda, čime rad u potpunosti spada u retroaktivnu hipotetičku analizu. Teorijsku osnovu za razmatranja alternativnih državotvornih rešenja čini ekonomska teorija optimalne veličine države, koja je identifikovala pogodnosti i troškove uvećanja države, pre svega one troškove koji su posledica povećanja kulturne heterogenosti usled uvećane jezičke, etničke i konfesionalne heterogenosti stanovništva. Identifikovano je pet državotvornih alternativa: proširenih Srbija sa različitim stepenom teri torijalnog proširenja i obuhvata stanovništva. Korišćenjem rezul tata popisa stanovništva iz 1921. godine, empirijski se pokazalo da bi one državotvorne alternative koje bi značile veće proširenje srpske države, pa bi stoga omogućile veći obuhvat srpskog stanovništva u matičnoj zemlji, neminovno uticale na uvećanje kulturne heterogenosti stanovništva te države. Identifikovano je optimalno državotvorno rešenje, koje nudi kompromis između pogodnosti i troškova.
- ČLANAK /
Sporazum o izboru suda prema uredbi Brisel II ter i njegov uticaj na nadležnost drugih sudovaRad je posvećen sporazumu o izboru suda prema Uredbi Vijeća (EU) 2019/1111 od 25. juna 2019. godine o nadležnosti, priznanju i izvršenju odluka u bračnim sporovima i u stvarima povezanima s roditeljskom odgovornošću te o međunarodnoj otmici djece (preinaka) i uticaju sporazuma na nadležnost drugih sudova. Specifičnost tog sporazuma je mogućnost izbora suda u materiji porodičnog prava, što u ranijem periodu nije bilo moguće. Ciljevi istraživanja su analiza formal nih uslova za valjanost sporazuma i njegova realizacija u praksi. Istraživanje je započeto na osnovu deduktivne metode odnosno općih saznanja o nadležnosti u pravu Evropske unije i sporazuma o izboru suda, te su korištene i normativna metoda i metoda sinteze. Na osnovu istraživanja smo došli do saznanja o načinima zaključivanja sporazuma o izboru nadležnog suda i osiguravanja njegovog pravnog djelovanja prema svim sudovima u Evropskoj uniji, odnosno o njegovom uticaju na pravila litispendencije.
Autor /- ANALIZA ZAKONODAVSTVA /
Šta je „autoplagijat“?U današnjoj klimi pojačane društvene pažnje u vezi sa plagijarizmom, u globalnoj akademskoj zajednici se kao poseban oblik etički problema tičnog ponašanja sve češće označava i praksa autoplagiranja. Ako se za plagijat i može reći da je bio predmet podrobnih pojmovnih ana liza, to nije slučaj sa autoplagijatom. Ovaj kratak osvrt ima za cilj pokušaj te vrste. Polazeći od odredbe čl. 25 Kodeksa profesionalne etike Univerziteta u Beogradu, razmatraju se najbitnija obeležja ovog akademskog etičkog prestupa. U preduzetoj pojmovnoj analizi se utvrđuje da se tvorac Kodeksa opredelio da inkriminiše kao etički neprihvatljivu samo užu praksu „duplog objavljivanja“ (duplicate or dual publication). Zaključuje se da i u slučaju pribegavanja takvoj praksi ne može biti govora o etičkom prekršaju autoplagiranja ako autor jasno naznači da ponovo objavljuje/upotrebljava vlastiti ranije objavljeni ili na drugi način iskorišćeni rad, odnosno delove rada.
“Digestive Jurisprudence” is the view that judicial decisions depend on what judges had for breakfast. The view is usually associated with Frank’s version of Legal Realism. The paper shows that, disputable as it is, that view comes from the philosophical background of Peirce’s pragmatism and the legal background of Holmes’ prediction theory. Peirce’s pragmatism was an account of concepts in terms of their predictable consequences. Holmes’ prediction theory was an account of law in terms of predictions of what judges will do. And Legal Realism focused on judicial behavior as determined by various factors including, in its most extreme and provocative version, breakfast quality and digestive processes. The paper does not ascertain whether the digestive view is true (to some extent); rather, it makes the working hypothesis that breakfast quality, or digestion quality, is not a sufficient condition of a certain outcome but, most likely, a bias-arouser.
© 1953 - 2026 ·