Redakcija /
dr Marija Karanikić Mirić [glavni i odgovorni urednik]
Članovi / dr Dušan Popović, dr Bojan Milisavljević, dr Vojislav Stanimirović, dr Ljubinka Kovačević, dr Danilo Vuković, dr Svetislav Kostić
Urednik veb sajta / dr Boris Begović
Sekretari / dr Nikola Ilić i dr Novak Vujičić
Tehnički sekretari/ Ksenija Džipković i Vukašin Stanojlović
- Autor /
- Redakcija 2023. godine
- PRILOG /
Sadržaj
Autor /- 2023. godine Redakcija
- ČLANAK /
Euthanasia in the Practice of the European Court of Human RightsThe paper aims to shed light on the interpretation of mercy killing, i.e., euthanasia, in European Court of Human Rights cases. This controversial phenomenon has a specific legal status. More specifically, due to the complexityof eutanasia, it is impossible to create universally accepted international standards. On the other hand, modern society creates a need to expand the legal boundaries regarding bioethical issues related to the compassionate end of-life care. The European Court of Human Rights is a unique international organization that interprets universal legal documents, especially the European Convention on Human Rights, in the context of euthanasia. Bearing this in mind, it is important to collect and analyze the information resulting from the specific decision-making process of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s past and future similar cases will certainly affect the future legal status of euthanasia both internationally and at the level of member states.
- ČLANAK /
Surrogacy – A Biomedical Mechanism in the Fight Against InfertilityThis paper reviews the issue of surrogacy. The author analyzes surrogacy and continues by conducting a comparative overview of two legal systems with different approaches to surrogacy. The analysis first looks at the legal system of Russia, as it represents a country that allows all forms of surrogacy, and then that of Germany, as a country with norms prohibiting all forms of surrogacy. In turn, the author reviews Serbian legal provisions, which also forbid all forms of surrogacy. The paper further explores whether there is justification for such legal provisions, i.e., it pinpoints potential problems that could arise if the legal provisions were to be changed. It is concluded that the Serbian legislator has decided to remain silent on this issue, most probably due to the fact that any amendments could raise questions that, at least for the time being, have no clear answers.
- ČLANAK /
Eventualni umišljaj i razgraničenje sa svesnim nehatom Centralna tema rada je sadržaj eventualnog umišljaja, pre svega u svetlu njegovog razgraničenja sa svesnim nehatom, od kojeg se razlikuje po elementu volje, dok je element svesti isti. To pitanje je važno zbog toga što posledice te demarkacije, dogmatski i kriminalnopolitički, neposredno i posredno, višestruko utiču na pravnu kvalifikaciju dela, visinu izrečene kazne i, uopšte, na (ne)kažnjivost određenog ponašanja.Nakon uvodnog objašnjenja tog značaja, analizirane su najpre brojne teorije i shvatanja o mogućim načinima razgraničenja (intelektualne i voluntativne teorije, teorije rizika) i posebno je ukazano na njihove prednosti i nedostatke. U drugom delu je potom provereno da li bi neka od tih teorija, samostalno ili u kombinaciji sa segmentima drugih teorija, mogla da se primeni na rešenje u srpskom zakonodavstvu koje, za razliku od drugih, zakonski definiše eventualni umišljaj i svesni nehat, ali i dalje nema sasvim adekvatan i zaokružen kriterijum njihovog razgraničenja
- ČLANAK /
Remarks on Early Medieval Alemannic CodesThe paper deals with the age and the origin of the early medieval Alemannic common law, the fragments of the Pactus Alamannorum and the text of the Lex Alamannorum, which has an exceptionally rich manuscript tradition. After examining the common roots of the regulations and the prologues of the Lex Alamannorum and the Lex Baiuvariorum, and the influence of Frankish capitularia on the Alemannic leges, a possible answer to the question regarding the date and the legislator will be presented.
Autor /- ČLANAK /
UNUTRAŠNJA I SPOLJNOPOLITIČKA TERMINOLOGIJA ANTIČKOG RIMA – DVE STRANE ISTE MEDALJEU radu su upoređivani saveti koje je Kvint davao svome bratu Marku Ciceronu o tome kako treba da vodi predizbornu kampanju, sa uputstvima koje je Ulpijan davao upravnicima provincija o tome kako treba da se ophode prema provincijalcima. Identifikovani su isti ili slični termini.Može se reći da su se kandidati na izborima služili sličnim metodama manipulacije u kampanji kakvim se služila rimska politika vimi u provicijama. Na kraju krajeva, to su samo dve strane iste medalje.
Autor /- Autor /
The paper aims to shed light on the interpretation of mercy killing, i.e., euthanasia, in European Court of Human Rights cases. This controversial phenomenon has a specific legal status. More specifically, due to the complexityof eutanasia, it is impossible to create universally accepted international standards. On the other hand, modern society creates a need to expand the legal boundaries regarding bioethical issues related to the compassionate end of-life care. The European Court of Human Rights is a unique international organization that interprets universal legal documents, especially the European Convention on Human Rights, in the context of euthanasia. Bearing this in mind, it is important to collect and analyze the information resulting from the specific decision-making process of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s past and future similar cases will certainly affect the future legal status of euthanasia both internationally and at the level of member states.
© 1953 - 2026 ·