Članak
dec 26
Nazad

VLADAVINA PRAVA IZMEĐU PRAVEDNOSTI I PUKE ZAKONITOSTI – KRATAK PRIKAZ RAZVOJA DISKURSA U KONCEPTU VLADAVINE PRAVA

Benjamin Nurkić, Faris Hasanović

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22306A
SAŽETAK /

Vladavina prava je jedan od ključnih koncepata 21. stoljeća. Ideja vladavine prava postoji onoliko koliko postoje i promišljanja o državi i pravu, kao i o odnosu između ta dva pojma. Cilj ovog rada je da se na jednom mjestu pokuša prikazati razvoj ideje vladavine prava tokom historije. Autori se, u tom smislu, bave promišljanjima filozofa koji su u velikoj mjeri odredili smjer razvoja ideje vladavine prava. Naravno, u radu nisu navedeni svi filozofi koji su se bavili vladavinom prava, ali se svakako pokušava na hronološki način prikazati kako se vladavina prava kao ideja razvijala od vremena Platona, pa sve do savremenih teoretičara vladavine prava.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici   Latinici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Akvinski, Toma. 1990. Država. Zagreb: Globus.
  2. Aristotel. 1984. Politika. Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko–grafički zavod.
  3. Bačić, Arsen. 3/1987. John Locke i njegov doprinos učenju o podjeli vlasti. Politička misao 24: 98–108.
  4. Bakšić–Muftić, Jasna. 2002. Sistem ljudskih prava. Sarajevo: Magistrat.
  5. Balasubramaniam, R. Rueban. 2008. Indefinite detention: rule by law or rule of law?. 118–142. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality, ed. Victor V. Ramraj. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552021.006
  6. Banović, Damir. 2019. Razumijevanje i neki problemi koncepta pravne validnosti i pravne efikasnosti u pozitivnopravnim i sociološkopravnim teorijama. Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu 62: 13–32.
  7. Bates, Clifford Angell. 2003. Aristotle’s „Best Regime“: Kingship, Demo­cracy, and the Rule of Law. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  8. Bates, Clifford Angell. 2013. Law and the Rule of Law and Its Place Relative to Politeia in Aristotle’s Politics. 59–75. Aristotle and The Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice, ed. Liesbeth Huppes–Cluysenaer, Nuno Coelho. Dordrecht: Springer, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6031-8_3
  9. Bingham, Tom. 2011. The Rule of Law. London: Penguin Group.
  10. Bix, Brian H. 2011. Radbruch’s Formula and conceptual analysis. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 56: 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/56.1.45
  11. Bix, H. Brian. 2013. Radbruch’s Formula, Conceptual Analysis, and the Rule of Law. 65–75. Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law, ed. Imer B. Flores, Kenneth E. Himma. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4743-2_5
  12. Bodenheimer, Edgar. 3/1950. The Natural–Law Doctrine Before the Tribunal of Science: A Reply To Hans Kelsen. Western Political Quarterly 3: 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591295000300303
  13. Bongiovanni, Giorgio. 2007. Rechtsstaat and Constitutional Justice in Austria: Hans Kelsen’s Contribution. 293–319. The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism, ed. Pietro Costa, Danilo Zolo. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5745-8_7
  14. Borowski, Martin. 2021. Gustav Radbruch’s Critique of Legal Positivism. 627–650. The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism, ed. Torben Spaak, Patricia Mindus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636377.027
  15. Burge–Hendrix, Brian. 2013. Plato and the Rule of Law. 27–47. Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law, ed. Imer B. Flores, Kenneth E. Himma. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4743-2_3
  16. Cristi, F. R. 3/1984. Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law. Canadian Journal of Political Science 17: 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900031899
  17. Dyzenhaus, David. 2001. Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law. Law and Philosophy 20: 461–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/3505220
  18. Dyzenhaus, David. 2021. Thomas Hobbes and the Rule by Law Tradition. 261–277. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, ed. Jens Meierhenrich, Martin Loughlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.015
  19. Frank, Jill. 3/2005. Aristotle on the Rule of Law and the Rule of Men. International Studies Review 7: 508–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2005.00529_3.x
  20. Frank, Jill. 1/2007. Aristotle on Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law. Critical Modernities: Politics and Law Beyond the Liberal Imagination 8: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1142
  21. Hayek, A. Friedrich. [1960] 1998. Poredak slobode. Novi Sad: Global Book.
  22. Fuller, L. Lon. 4/1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review 71: 630–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226
  23. Fuller, L. Lon. 1960. Adjudication and the Rule of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921–1969) 54: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700038519
  24. Fuller, L. Lon. 1969. The Morality of Law. 2. ed. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
  25. Gosalbo–Bono, Ricardo. 2010. The Significance of the Rule of Law and its Implications for the European Union and the United States. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 72: 229 –360. https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2010.159
  26. Haldemann, Frank. 2/2005. Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law. Ratio Juris 18: 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00293.x
  27. Hart, H. L. A. 4/1958. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225
  28. Hasanbegović, Jasminka. 2021. Ka filozofiji prava kao filozofiji ljudskih prava. Beograd: Dosije studio.
  29. Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 2004. Levijatan ili Građa, oblik i moć crkvene i građanske države. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
  30. Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 2018. Leviathan. New York: Dover Publications.
  31. Jakopec, Petar. 3/2013. Filozofi ja politike Johna Lockea u „Drugoj raspravi o vladi“. Nova prisutnost 11: 419–432.
  32. Jenco, K. Leigh. 1/2010. „Rule by Man“ and „Rule by Law“ in Early Republican China: Contributions to a Theoretical Debate. The Journal of Asian Studies 69: 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911809991562
  33. Jenkins, David. 3/2011. The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative. McGill Law Journal 56: 543–589. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005132ar
  34. Kelsen, Hans. [1934] 2012. Čista teorija prava. Zagreb: Naklada Breza.
  35. Lalović, Dragutin. 1/2006. U Hobbesovoj zamci: pojam suverenosti?. Politička misao 43: 3–27.
  36. Lanni, Adriaan. 2021. Classical Athens’ Radical Democratic ‘Rule of Law.’ 25–38. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, ed. Jens Meierhenrich, Martin Loughlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.002
  37. Leawoods, Heather. 2/2000. Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher. Journal of Law and Policy 489–515.
  38. Lino, Dylan. 5/2018. The Rule of Law and the Rule of Empire: A.V. Dicey in Imperial Context. The Modern Law Review 81: 739–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12363
  39. Lisi, Francisco. 2013. Plato and the Rule of Law. Methexis 26: 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000615
  40. Locke, John. [1689] 1993. Two Treatises of Government. 2. ed. London: Orion Publishing Group.
  41. Lukina, Anna. 4/2020. Opening the Pandora’s Box: Kelsen and the Communist theory of law. Jurisprudence 11: 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2020.1782587
  42. Malcolm, Noel. 2016. Thomas Hobbes: Liberal illiberal. Journal of the British Academy 4: 113–136. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/004.113
  43. Mattie, Sean. 1/2005. Prerogative and the Rule of Law in John Locke and the Lincoln Presidency. The Review of Politics 67: 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500043333
  44. Milić, Novica. 2020. Politička naratologija: Ogled o demokratiji. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
  45. Morrow, R. Gienn. 2/1941. Platon and the Rule of Law. The Philosophical Review 50: 105–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2180960
  46. Moustafa, Tamir, Ginsburg, Tom. 2008. Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics. Rule by law: the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes, ed. Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa, New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822
  47. Nojman, Franc. [1986] 2002. Vladavina prava: politička teorija i pravni sistem u modernom društvu. Beograd: Filip Višnjić.
  48. Paulson, Stanley L. 1995. Radbruch on unjust laws: Competing earlier and later views. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15: 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.3.489
  49. Pavlović, Vukašin. 1/2006. Značenje Hobbesova Levijatana za političku sociologiju. Hobbes kao univerzalni mislilac moderne politike. Politička misao 43: 59–78.
  50. Platon. 1957. Zakoni. Zagreb: Kultura.
  51. Platon. 2002. Država. 5. ed. Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko–grafički zavod.
  52. Radbruch, Gustav. 2019. Filozofija prava – Filozofija prava [1932], 13–244; Nacrt pogovora uz Filozofiju prava [1947], 245–264; Pet minuta filozofije prava [1945], 265–266; Zakonsko nepravo i iznadzakonsko pravo [1946], 267–278. Zagreb: Naklada Breza.
  53. Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
  54. Raz, Joseph. 1980. The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System. 2. ed. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253631.001.0001
  55. Raz, Joseph. 3/1990. The Politics of the Rule of Law. Ratio Juris 3: 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00066.x
  56. Raz, Joseph. 1/1993. On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning. Ratio Juris 6: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00134.x
  57. Ribarević, Luka. 1/2006. Prirodni zakoni u sjeni prirodnoga prava: dvije linije argumentacije u Levijatanu. Politička misao 43: 79–92.
  58. Rundle, Kristen. 2021. The Morality of the Rule of Law: Lon L. Fuller. 186–201. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, ed. Jens Meierhenrich, Martin Loughlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.011
  59. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2014. Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. 2. ed. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8935-6
  60. Sørensen, D. Anders. 2018. Political Office and the Rule of Law in Plato’s Statesman. Polis 35: 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340173
  61. Spaak, Torben. 2005. Kelsen and Hart on the Normativity of Law. 397–414. Perspectives on Jurisprudence: Essays in Honour of Jes Bjarup, ed. Peter Wahlgren. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandianvian Law.
  62. Stone Sweet, Alec. 8/2003. Why Europe rejected American judicial review: and why it may not matter. Michigan Law Review 101: 2744–2780. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595394
  63. Svetlič, Rok. 1/2007. Ontološki uvjeti nastanka pravnog pozitivizma. Filozofska istraživanja 27: 113–125.
  64. Tamanaha, Z. Brian. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812378
  65. Tamanaha, Z. Brian. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511073
  66. Tan, Seow Hon. 2/2021. Radbruch’s Formula Revisited: The Lex Injusta Non Est Lex Maxim in Constitutional Democracies. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 34: 461–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2021.12
  67. Tushnet, Mark. 2/2014. Rule by Law or Rule of Law?. Asia Pacific Law Review 22: 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2014.11745925
  68. Valter, Robert. 1999. Teorija prava Hansa Kelzena. Beograd: Dosije.
  69. Vinx, Lars. 2007. Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227952.001.0001
  70. Vorländer, Hans. 2012. Ustav: Ideja i historija. Sarajevo: University Press.
  71. Waldron, Jeremy. 1/1989. The Rule of Law in Contemporary Liberal Theory. Ratio Juris 2: 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1989.tb00028.x
  72. Waldron, Jeremy. 1/2015. Legislation and the Rule of Law. Legisprudence 1: 91–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521467.2007.11424661
  73. Waldron, Jeremy. 1/2021. The rule of law and the role of courts. Global Constitutionalism 10: 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381720000283
  74. Walters, D. Mark. 2021. The Spirit of Legality: A. V. Dicey and the Rule of Law. 153–170. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, ed. Jens Meierhenrich, Martin Loughlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108600569.009
  75. Walters, Mark. 3/2010. Legality as Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law. McGill Law Journal 55: 563–586. https://doi.org/10.7202/1000624ar
  76. Williams, Juliet. 1/1997. On the road again: Hayek and the rule of law. Critical Review 11: 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819708443446
  77. Wolf, Erik. 1958. Revolution or Evolution in Gustav Radbruch’s Legal Philosophy. Natural Law Forum 25: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/3.1.1