Članak
sep 26
Nazad

RULE OF LAW THROUGH THE MIRROR GLASS – IS THE NEW 2020 ENLARGEMENT METHODOLOGY A PRE-ACCESSION TEU ARTICLE 7 MECHANISM?

Aleksandar Andrija Pejović

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21306A
SAŽETAK /

The rule of law in the EU is a very complex concept due to its nature, different understanding and its diverse practical implementation, which has led to rule of law backsliding. In parallel, the rule of law represents a crucial pillar of the conditionality policy of new accession processes. The EU’s recent enlargement methodology introduced more stringent and conditional criteria for progress. This resulted in similarities between TEU Article 7 sanctioning mechanism and the new enlargement methodology that implies elaborate sanctions approach for candidate countries in cases of values’ breaches, backsliding, stagnation and lagging behind. The EU polity has, therefore, taken advantage of the empiric knowledge about the rule of law within its own borders and in the enlargement countries, constantly moving between the thin and the thick concept of the rule of law. The two processes have been feeding into each other, therefore, resulting in a growing convergence.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Ahtisaari, Marti, Jochen Frowein, Marcelino Oreja. 2000. Report adopted in Paris. 8 September.
  2. Berretta, Emmanuel. 2019. Élargissement de l’UE: Macron fait attendre l’Albanie et la Macédoine. Le Point, 18 October.
  3. Blauberger, Michael, Vera van Hüllen. 1/2020. Conditionality of EU funds: An Instrument to Enforce EU Fundamental Values?. Journal of European Integration 43: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708337
  4. Council of the European Union. 2012. General EU Position, Ministerial meeting opening the Intergovernmental Conference on the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union, 23/1. Brussels, 29 June 2012.
  5. Council of the European Union. 2014. Conclusions of the Council and the Member States meeting within the Council on ensuring respect for the rule of law of 16 December 2014, 16862/14. Brussels, 16 December 2014.
  6. Council of the European Union. 2018. Outcome of the Council Meeting President 3629nd General Affairs Council, 10555/18. Brussels, 26 June 2018.
  7. Council of the European Union. 2019a. Outcome of the Council Meeting President 3702nd General Affairs Council, 10396/19, Luxembourg, 18 June 2019.
  8. Council of the European Union. 2019b. Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process – Albania and the Republic of North Macedonia, Presidency conclusions, 13155/19. Luxembourg, 15 October 2019.
  9. Council of the European Union. 2020. Outcome of the Council Meeting President General Affairs Council, Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process − the Republic of North Macedonia and the Republic of Albania Council conclusions, 7002/20. Brussels, 25 March 2020.
  10. Council of the European Union. 2021. Working document on the application of the revised enlargement methodology to the accession negotiations with Montenegro and Serbia, 8536/21. Brussels, 6 May 2021.
  11. Culver, Keith, Michael Giudice. 2012. Not a System but an Order: An Inter-Institutional View of European Union Law. 54–76 in Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law, edited by Julie Dickson and Pavlos Eleftheriadis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0003
  12. Damjanovski, Ivan, Christophe Hillion, Denis Preshova. 2020. Uniformity and Differentiation in the Fundamentals of EU Membership: The EU Rule of Law Acquis in the Pre– and Post-accession Contexts. EUIDEA Research Papers 4: 1–32.
  13. Drinóczi Tímea. 2019. The European Rule of Law and illiberal legality in illiberal constitutionalism: the case of Hungary. MTA LAW Working Papers 16: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3470005
  14. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2016. Rule of Law Checklist, CDL-AD (2016)007rev. Strasbourg, 18 March.
  15. European Commission. 2012. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012–2013, COM (2012) 600 final. Brussels, 10 October 2012.
  16. European Commission. 2013a. President of the European Commission José Manuel Durão Barroso, State of the Union address 2013, Speech/13/684, 11 September.
  17. European Commission. 2014. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law, COM (2014) 158 final. Brussels, 11 March 2014.
  18. European Commission. 2017. Proposal for a Council Decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law, COM/2017/0835 final – 2017/0360 (NLE).
  19. European Commission. 2018a. Commission Staff Working Document, Montenegro 2018 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2018 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy, SWD (2018) 150 final. Strasbourg, 17 April 2018.
  20. European Commission. 2018b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Com (2018) 450 final.
  21. European Commission. 2019a. Commission Staff Working Document, Turkey 2019 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2019 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy, SWD (2019) 220 final. Brussels, 29 May 2019.
  22. European Commission. 2019b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening the rule of law within the Union – A blueprint for action, COM/2019/343 final, 17 July 2019.
  23. European Commission. 2020a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Enhancing the accession process – A credible EU perspective for the Western Balkans, COM (2020) 57 final. Brussels, 5 February 2020.
  24. European Commission. 2020b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2020) 580 final, 2020 Rule of Law Report.
  25. European Council. 2019. Presidency conclusions. Brussels, 17–18 October.
  26. European Integration Office, Government of Montenegro. 2020. Informacija o novoj metodologiji pristupanja Evropskoj uniji, 14 May.
  27. European Parliament. 2018. The situation in Hungary European Parliament resolution. P8_TA(2018)0340 (2017/2131(INL)).
  28. European Western Balkans. 2020. Vučić: Obavestio sam Makrona da Srbija prihvata novu metodologiju proširenja EU, 10 July. https://europeanwesternbalkans.rs/vucic-obavestio-sam-makrona-da-srbija-prihvata-novu-metodologiju-prosirenja-eu (last visited 21 April, 2021).
  29. Government of France. Non-Paper Reforming the European Union accession process. France, 16 November 2020.
  30. Grabowska-Moroz, Barbara, Dimitry Kochenov. 2020. Understanding the Best Practices in the Area of the Rule of Law, Working paper. Reconnect Europe Project, European Commission, Brussels.
  31. Halmai, Gábor. 2018. The Possibility and Desirability of Rule of Law Conditionality. The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0077-2
  32. Halmai, Gábor. 2019. The Fundamental Law of Hungary and the European Constitutional Values. DPCE online, February 2019.
  33. Hungary Today. 2021. Hungarian Press Roundup: Hungary and Poland Challenge EU Rule of Law Conditionality, 19 March. https://hungarytoday.hu/hungary-poland-challenge-eu-rule-of-law-conditionality/ (last visited 21 April, 2021).
  34. Kochenov, Dimitry. 1/2015. EU Law without the Rule of Law: Is the Veneration of Autonomy Worth it?. Yearbook of European Law 34: 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yev009
  35. Lührmann, Anna, Staffan I. Lindberg. 7/2019. A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?. Democratization 26: 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
  36. Miglio, Alberto. 2019. Reverse Qualified Majority Vote in Post-Crisis EU economic governance: A Circumvention of Institutional Balance?. Working paper. RescEU No 43–01.
  37. Møller, Jørgen, Svend-Erik Skaaning. 2010. Systematizing Thin and Thick Conceptions of the Rule of Law. APSA Annual Meeting. Washington DC.
  38. Osterdahl, Inger. 2019. Article 7 TEU and the rule of law mechanism: a dissuasive weapon or a paper tiger?. 241–260 in The Authority of EU Law: Do We Still Believe in It?, edited by Wolfgang Heusel, Jean-Philippe Rageade. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58841-3_19
  39. Pech, Laurent. 2009. The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union. The Jean Monnet Working Paper Series 04/09: 1–79. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1463242
  40. Pech, Laurent. 2019. From “Nuclear Option” to Damp Squib? A Critical Assessment of the Four Article 7(1) TEU Hearings to Date. Verfassungsblog (on matters constitutional), published online. https://verfassungsblog.de/from-nuclear-option-to-damp-squib/ (last visited 21 April, 2021)
  41. Peirone, Franco. 2019. The Rule of Law in the EU: Between Union and Unity. CYELP 15: 57–98. https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.15.2019.344
  42. Politico. 2020. Commission Report finds many EU Nations Fall Short on Rule of Law, 30 September. https://www.politico.eu/article/european-commission-report-finds-many-eu-nations-hungary-poland-malta-bulgaria-falling-short-rule-of-law/ (last visited 21 April, 2021)
  43. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2018. How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18/01. Sydney: Sydney Law School. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103491
  44. Tamanaha, Brian. 2004. On the Rule of Law, History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812378
  45. Taskinsoy, John, Cemil Kuzey. 2020. Is Turkey Backsliding on Global Competitiveness and Democracy Amid Its EU Bid in Limbo?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3648210
  46. The Economist. 2021. The EU’s Calhounian moment, 17 April. https://www.economist.com/europe/2021/04/17/the-eus-calhounian-moment (last visited 22 April, 2021).
  47. Van Aken, Wim, Lionel Artige. 2013. A comparative Analysis of Reverse Majority Voting. EUSA Thirteen Biennial Conference. Baltimore.