Članak
mar 26
Nazad

PRAVO DETETA NA IDENTITET U KONTEKSTU PRAVILA O ANONIMNOSTI DONORA REPRODUKTIVNIH ĆELIJA

Tamara Mladenović

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23103A
SAŽETAK /

Značaj prava deteta na identitet, koje je izričito priznato članom 8 Konvencije Ujedinjenih nacija o pravima deteta, rezultirao je napuštanjem tradicionalnog principa anonimnosti donora reproduktivnog materijala u velikom broju evropskih država. Međutim, određena nacionalna zakonodavstva još uvek se priklanjaju tom konceptu zabrane otkrivanja identiteta donora, dok pojedina predviđaju mešoviti model s ciljem uravnoteženja suprotstavljenih interesa. Debata je polarizovana između prava na privatnost donora i roditelja i prava deteta da zna svoje biološko poreklo. U radu je razmotren uticaj pravila o anonimnosti na mogućnost ostvarivanja prava deteta na identitet. Analiza različitih rešenja država evropskog pravnog prostora i stavova organa nadležnih za kontrolu primene najznačajnijih međunarodnih ugovora dovela je do izdvajanja odgovarajućih smernica za odmeravanje interesa u konfliktu. Iako je idealno rešenje tog pitanja teško zamislivo, zadovoljavajući bi mogao biti režim koji pruža garancije interesima svih lica, s fokusom na zaštitu prava deteta kao najugroženije strane.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici   Latinici  
REFERENCE /
  1. Benward, Jean. 2012. Identity Development In The Donor-Conceived. 166–191. The Right To Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children, ed. Juliet Guichon, Ian Mitchell, Michelle Giroux. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
  2. Besson, Samantha. 2007. Enforcing the Child’s Right to Know Her Origins: Contrasting Approaches Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Convention on Human Rights.: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21: 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm003
  3. Blyth, Eric. 2/2006. Donor Anonymity and Secrecy versus Openness Concerning the Genetic Origins of the Offspring: International Perspectives. Jerusalem: ASSIA – Jewish Medical Ethics 5: 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebp002
  4. Blyth, Eric, Lucy Frith. 2009. Donor-Conceived People’s Access To Genetic And Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity. Oxford: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23: 174–191.
  5. Burr, Jennifer. 2010. To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors. Shanghai: Asian Journal of Andrology 12: 801–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.60
  6. Baylor, Solveig. 2021. To Know or not to Know: Anonymous Reproductive Donors and Their Children. https://guulr.com/2021/01/14/to-know-or-not-to-know-anonymous-reproductive-donors-and-their-children/, poslednji pristup 29. novembra 2022.
  7. Cahn, Naomi. 4/2014. Do Tell! The Rights of Donor-Conceived Offspring. Hofsa Law Rewiew 42: 1077–1124.
  8. Clark, Brigitte. 3/2012. A Balancing Act? The Rights of Donor-Conceived Children to Know Their Biological Origins. Athens:Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 40: 621–640.
  9. Cohen, Glenn. 2012. Response: Rethinking Sperm-Donor Anonymity: Of Changed Selves, Nonidentity, and One-Night Stands. Washington: The Georgetown Law Journal 100: 431–447.
  10. Cordray, Bill. 2012. Does the Right to Know Matter? 40–48. The Right To Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children, ed. Juliet Guichon, Ian Mitchell, Michelle Giroux. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
  11. Correia, Monica Bessa, Guilhermina Rego, Rui Nunes. 1/2021. The Right to be Forgotten Versus the Right to Disclosure of Gamete Donors’ ID: Ethical and Legal Considerations. Santiago: Acta Bioethica 27: 69–78. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2021000100069
  12. Draškić, Marija. 2011. Pravo deteta na saznanje porekla. Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  13. Draškić, Marija. 2016. Komentar Porodičnog zakona, Praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, praksa Ustavnog suda, praksa redovnih sudova prema stanju zakonodavstva od 1. decembra 2015. godine. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  14. Emerson, Rachel L. 1/2022. Privacy vs. Identity Rights: A Call for the United Stated to Adopt the United Kingdom’s „Open ID“ System for Artificial Reproductive Technology. Ohio:Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 54: 420–446.
  15. Fitzpatrick, Michael. 2022. Sperm donors lose their anonymity under French bioethics law. https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20220902-sperm-donors-lose-their-anonymity-under-french-bioethics-law, poslednji pristup 29. novembra 2022.
  16. Freeman, Michael. 1996. The new birth right? Identity and the child of the reproduction revolution. Alphen aan den Rijn: The International Journal of Children’s Rights 4: 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181896X00176
  17. Frith, Lucy. 5/2001. Beneath the Rhetoric, The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non-anonymous Gamete Donation. Oxford: Bioethics 15: 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00255
  18. Frith, Lucy. 9/2007. Gamete Donation, Identity, and the Offspring’s Right to Know. Chicago:American Medical Association Journal of Ethics 9: 644–648. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.9.oped1-0709
  19. Gilman, Leah, Petra Nordqvist. 2018. Organizing Openness: How UK Policy Defines the Significance of Information and Information Sharing about Gamete Donation. Oxford: International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family 32: 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eby014
  20. Giovannini, Giulia. 2022. The French Law on Bioethics and its Limitations: Challenges for the Future from a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family 00: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac011
  21. Groll, Daniel. 2021. „Who am I?„: The ethics of sperm and egg donation. https://bioethics.umn.edu/news/who-am-i-ethics-sperm-and-egg-donation, poslednji pristup 28. novembra 2022.
  22. Guichon, Juliet, Ian Mitchell, Michelle Giroux. 2012. The Right To Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
  23. Hodding Carter II, William. 1953. Where Main Street Meets the River. New York: Rinehart & Company.
  24. Indekeu, Astrid, A. Janneke, B. M. Maas, Emily McCormik, Jean Benward, Joanna E. Scheib. 2/2021. Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donor: a systematic review. Washington: American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2: 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.01.003
  25. Kessler, Guillaume. 2019. The Parentage Disruption: A Comparative Approach, International Journal of Law. Oxford: International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family 33: 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebz012
  26. Kovaček Stanić, Gordana. 2021. Pravo deteta na roditeljsko staranje – savremeni aspekti. 30 godina primene Konvencije Ujedinjenih nacija o pravima deteta – savremeni aspekti. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
  27. Kovaček Stanić, Gordana. 2022. The child’s right to know their biological origin in comparative European Law: Consequences for parentage law. 199–210. Global reflections on children’s rights and the law: 30 years after the Convention on the Rights of the Child, ed. Ellen Marrus, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles. London – New York: Routledge Research in Human Rights Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131144-24
  28. Lampic, Claudia, Agneta Skoog Svanberg, Johannes Gudmundsson, Pia Leandersson, Nils-Gunner Solensten, Ann Thurin-Kjellberg, Kjell Wånggren, Gunilla Sydsjö. 3/2022. National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor – experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Oxford: Human Reproducton 37: 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab275
  29. Łukasiewicz, Rafal, Angelo Viglianisi Ferraro, 3/2021. Anonymity and openness in gamete donation: the Russian policy on the third-party reproduction. Bitola: Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 7: 267–279. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2137267l
  30. Lyons, Donna. 2018. Domestic Implementation of the Donor-Conceived Child’s Right to Identity in Light of the Requirements of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Oxford: International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family 32: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx013
  31. Mladenović, Tamara. 2/2021. Pravo na anonimni porođaj naspram prava deteta na identitet. Beograd: Pravni zapisi: 443–463. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-34192
  32. Mulligan, Andrea. 2/2022. Anonymous gamete donation and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: The case of incompatibility. Medical Law International 22: 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332221096210
  33. Pennings, Guido. 12/1997. The ‘double track’ policy for donor anonymity. Oxford: Human Reproduction 12: 2839–2844. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.12.2839
  34. Piñero, Veronica. 2012. This Is Not Baby Talk: Canadian International Human Rights Obligations Regarding the Rights to Health, Identity and Family Relations. 251–275.The Right To Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children, ed. Juliet Guichon, Ian Mitchell, Michelle Giroux. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
  35. Ponjavić, Zoran, Veljko Vlašković. 2022. Porodično pravo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  36. Preložnjak, Barbara. 2020. Modern Challenges in the Implementation of the Child’s Right to Know His Origin. Osijek: EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series 4: 1175–1203. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11944
  37. Ravitsky, Vardit. 2/2014. Autonomous Choice and the Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins. New York:Hastings Center Report 44: 36–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.286
  38. Riaño-Galán, Isolina, Carmen Martinez González, Sergio Gallego Riesta. 2021. Cuestiones èticas y legales del anonimato y la condifencialidad en la donción de gametes.Madrid: Anales de Pediatría 94: 337.e1–337.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2021.02.008
  39. Samardžić, Sandra. 2012. Pravo deteta na saznanje porekla u slučaju biomedicinski potpomognute oplodnje –uporednopravni prikaz. 166–182. Prava djeteta i ravnopravnost polova – između normativnog i stvarnog, zbornik radova. Pale.
  40. Samardžić, Sandra. 2018. Prava deteta u oblasti medicinski asistirane reprodukcije. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
  41. Sauer, Julie. 2009. Competing Interests and Gamete Donation: The Case for Anonymity. New York:Seton Hall Law Review 39: 919–954.
  42. Schmahl, Stefanie. 2021. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child – Article-by-Article Commentary. London: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509954469
  43. Shanner, Laura. 2012. When Is a Secret Justified? Ethics and Donor Anonymity. 233–248.The Right To Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children, ed. Juliet Guichon, Ian Mitchell, Michelle Giroux. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
  44. Somerville, Margaret. 2010. Children’s Human Rights to Natural Biological Origins and Family Structure. International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family 35: 35–53.
  45. Sutter, Petra. 2018. Anonymous donation of sperm and oocytes: balancing the rights of parents, donors and children. Council of Europe: Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, Parliamentary Assembly.
  46. Tobin, John. 2019. The Un Convention on the Rights of the Child: A commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Vlašković, Veljko. 2014. Načelo najboljeg interesa deteta u porodičnom pravu. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
  48. Yuko, Elizabeth. 2016. The First Artificial Insemination Was an Ethical Nightmare. The Atlantic. January 8th. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/01/first-artificial-insemination/423198/, poslednji pristup 12. novembra 2022.
  49. Šansa za roditeljstvo. 2019. Anonimnost donora postaje prošlost u nekim zemljama – zašto? Decembar 12. https://sansazaroditeljstvo.org.rs/anonimnost-donora-postaje-proslost-u-nekim-zemljama/, poslednji pristup 29. novembra 2022.
  50. Le monde. 2022. End of automatic anonymity for sperm and egg donors in France. September 1st. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2022/09/01/end-of-automatic-anonymity-for-sperm-and-egg-donors-in-france_5995495_7.html, poslednji pristup 29. novembar
    2022.
  51. Cryogonia. 2022. Provision of donor sperm. https://cryogonia.gr/en/become-a-recipient/faq-3/, poslednji pristup 29. novembra 2022.