Članak
mar 26
Nazad

ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Rodoljub ETINSKI

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24102A
SAŽETAK /

The article analyzes the use of precedent by the European Court of Human Rights. It examines the various types of precedents in the practice of the Court and how they are utilized. It discusses different methods of development of case law, including overruling precedents, branching of the case law, and fragmentation of the case law. The article also proposes guidelines for the orderly development of case law.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Altiparmak, Kerem. 2/2004. Bankovic: An Obstacle to the Application of the European Convention on Human Rights in Iraq? Journal of Conflict and Security Law 9: 213–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.2.213
  2. Collier, Charles W. 1988. Precedent and Legal Authority: A Critical History, Wisconsin Law Review 771: 813–14.
  3. Djajić, Sanja, Rodoljub Etinski. 2018. Summary Procedure before the Strasbourg Court under Article 28(1)b of the European Convention on Human Rights: Judicial Economy under Scrutiny. Polish Yearbook of International Law 38: 73–98.
  4. Djajić, Sanja. 2018. The Concept of Precedent at the European Court for Human Rights and National Responses to the Doctrine with Special Reference to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia. Harmonisation of Serbian and Hungarian Law with the European Union Law VI. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Publishing Center.
  5. Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, Conor O’Mahony. 2/2013. Evolutive Interpretation of Rights Provisions: A Comparison of the European Court of Human Rights and the U.S. Supreme Court. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 44: 309–366.
  6. Eng, Svein. 2000. Doctrine of Precedent in English and Norwegian Law – Some Common and Specific Features. Scandinavian Studies in Law 39: 275–324.
  7. Etinski, Rodoljub. 2/2022. Evolutive Interpretation of Treaties and Risk of Judicial Legislation. Studia Iuridica Montenegrina 2: 7–29.
  8. Farnelli, Gian Maria, Federico Ferri, Mauro Gatti, Susanna Villani. 2/2022. Introduction: Judicial Precedent in International and European Law. Italian Review of International and Comparative Law 2, 263–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020003
  9. Happold, Matthew. 1/2003. Bankovic v. Belgium and the Territorial Scope of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 3: 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/3.1.77
  10. Hunter, Dan. 4/2001. Reason is Too Large: Analogy and Precedent in Law. Emory Law Journal 50: 1197–264. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239739
  11. Loussouarn, Yvon. 2/1958. The Relative Importance of Legislation, Custom, Doctrine, and Precedent in French Law. Louisiana Law Review 18: 235–70.
  12. Maltz, Earl. 1988. The Nature of Precedent. North Carolina Law Review 66: 367–68.
  13. Mowbray, Alastair. 2/2009. An Examination of the European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to Overruling Its Previous Case Law. Human Rights Law Review 9: 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp006
  14. Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 3/2003. Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law 14: 529–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.3.529
  15. Postema, G. J. 1987. Some Roots of Our Notion of Precedent. 9–33 in Precedent in Law, edited by Laurence Goldstein, New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Roxstrom, Erik, Gibney, Mark, Einarsen, Terje. 1/2005. The NATO Bombing Case (Bankovic et al. v. Belgium et al.) and the Limits of Western Human Rights Protection. Boston University International Law Journal 23: 55–136.
  17. Salmond, John. 1957. Jurisprudence, 11th ed, edited by Glanville Williams. London: Sweet&Maxwell.
  18. Shevchuk, S. 5–6/2011. Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis. Law of Ukraine: Legal Journal 173: 156.
  19. Tiersma, Peter M. 3/2007. Textualization of Precedent. Notre Dame Law Review 82: 1187–278.
  20. Wildhaber, Luzius. 2000. Precedent in the European Court of Human Rights. 1529–45 in Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective, Studies in memory of Rolv Ryssdal, edited by Paul Mahoney, Franz Matscher, Herbert Petzold, Luzius Wildhaber. Cologne: Carl Heymanns.