Članak
dec 25
Nazad

LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF THE 1982 PIL ACT AND FILLING THE LEGAL GAPS IN THE CONFLICT OF LAWS MATTER IN SERBIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE

Sanja MARJANOVIĆ

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24407A
SAŽETAK /

Despite the aspiration to comprehensively regulate legal relations, legislators can hardly avoid the occurrence of legal gaps, which may also arise due to the longevity of a statutory act that can no longer properly keep up with the development of a specific area of law. In Serbian Private International Law, the methods of filling legal gaps are regulated in Article 2 of the 1982 PIL Act, which provides three sets of principles: principles of the Act itself, the principles of the Serbian legal order, and the principles of PIL. However, certain international sources of Serbian PIL have engendered an unusual effect of hierarchical relationship with statutory conflict-of-laws rules, thus generating a different perception of gap-fillers (i.e. nationality principle, weaker party protection). In the paper, the author examines these issues, considering (to some extent) how legal gaps emerge in this branch of law, as well as the limits of characterization.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Bonomi, Andrea. 2013. Explanatory Report of the Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/44d7912f-ce6d-487e-b3ac-65bbd14fe1b2.pdf, last visited November 16, 2024.
  2. Dika, Mihajlo, Gašo Knežević, Srđan Stojanović. 1991. Article 2. Legal gaps. 12–13 in Komentar Zakona o međunarodnom privatnom i procesnom pravu. Beograd: Nomos.
  3. Dollinger, Jacob. 2000. Evolution of Principles for Resolving Conflicts in the Field of Contracts and Torts. 191–512 in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law in Volume 283. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
  4. Dutta, Anatol. 2015. Uobičajeno boravište u odnosu na državljanstvo – u potrazi za osobnom poveznicom u europskom obiteljskom pravu. 319–327 in Private International Law in the Jurisprudence of European Courts – Family at Focus, edited by Mirela Župan. Osijek: Pravni fakultet Sveučilištva Josipa Jurja Strossmayera.
  5. Đorđević, Slavko, Zlatan Meškić. 2016. Međunarodno privatno pravo I – opšti deo. Kragujevac: Institut za pravne i društvene nauke – Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
  6. Đorđević, Slavko. 2/2019. Teleološka redukcija kolizinih normi i popunjavanje pravnih praznina u Zakonu o rešavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalja. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Novom Sadu LIII: 467–487. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns53-21968
  7. Đorđević, Slavko. 2020. Utvrđivanje i popunjavanje pravnih praznina u Zakonu o rešavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalja. Kragujevac: Institut za pravne i društvene nauke – Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
  8. Đurović, Draško. 2/2009. Odnos unutrašnjeg i međunarodnog prava u pravnom poretku Republike Srbije. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 57: 338–353.
  9. Essén, Eric. 1968. Explanatory Report on the Convention on the Law Applicable to Traffic Accidents. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/826ac363–4725–484a-9435–0f10802ba2b3.pdf, last visited September 20, 2024.
  10. Goldner Lang, Iris. 2022. The child’s best interests as a gap filler and expander of EU law in internal situations. 563–574 in Research Handbook on General Principles in EU Law Constructing Legal Orders in Europe, edited by Katja S. Ziegler, Päivi J. Neuvonen and Violeta Moreno-Lax. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712389.00044
  11. Krstić, Ivana. 12/2015. Status međunarodnog prava u pravnom poretku Republike Srbije i njegova primena u praksi. Pravni život IV: 21–36.
  12. Lagarde, Paul. 1996. Explanatory Report on the 1996 HCCH Child Protection Convention. 533–605 in Proceedings of the Eighteenth Session (1996), tome II, Protection of children. Hague: HCCH.
  13. Marjanović, Sanja. 2015. Zaštita dece u haškim konvencijama o međunarodnom privatnom pravu. Niš: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.
  14. Marjanović, Sanja. 2019. Međunarodno privatno pravo haških konvencija u Republici Srbiji. Niš: Centar za publikacije – Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.
  15. Marjanović, Sanja, Bernadet Bordaš. 2021. Protection of children – victims of domestic violence in the Serbian private international law. 63–88 in 30 godina primene Konvencije Ujedinjenih nacija o pravima deteta – savremeni aspekti, edited by Tibor Varadi, Gordana Kovaček Stanić. Beograd: SANU.
  16. Marjanović, Sanja. 10/2022. Private International Law – Serbia. SEE Law Journal, special edition: Guide to Good Practice 10: 293–309.
  17. Marjanović, Sanja, Sanja Đorđević Aleksovski. Forthcoming. HCCH Conventions or Bilateral Treaties in the Serbian PIL – Everything Everywhere All at Once? Private International Law and International Organizations – achievements and challenges. Conference Proceedings, edited by Nebojša Raičević, Sanja Marjanović.
  18. Marković, Ratko. 2/2006. Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006 – kritički pogled. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 54: 5–46.
  19. Neuvonen, Päivi J., Katja S. Ziegler. 2022. General principles in the EU legal order: past, present and future directions. 7–24 in Research Handbook on General Principles in EU Law Constructing Legal Orders in Europe Research Handbooks in European Law series, edited by Katja S. Ziegler, Päivi J. Neuvonen, Violeta Moreno-Lax. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712389.00007
  20. Novaković, Marko. 2013. Odnos države prema ljudskim pravima kroz neposrednu primenu međunarodnih konvencija. 218–228 in Basic Concepts of Public International Law – Monism and Dualism, edited by Marko Novaković. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Institute of Comparative Law, Institute of International Politics and Economics.
  21. Pavić, Vladimir, Marko Jovanović. 2020. Evolucija principa uređivanja privatnopravnih odnosa sa elementom inostranosti u srpskim kodi­fikacijama međunarodnog privatnog prava. 430–456 in Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije – 2020, edited by Vuk Radović. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  22. Pérez Fuentes, Gisela María, Karla Cantoral Domínguez. 2/2015. The best interest of the minor as a principle of interpretation in Mexican civil law. Mexican Law Review VII: 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30004-X
  23. Reese, Willis L. M. 1972. Explanatory report on the Convention on applicable law to products liability. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/d842b133-cf76–480c-9cc8–631439b2a4b2.pdf, last visited September 10, 2024.
  24. Stanivuković, Maja, Mirko Živković. 2023. Međunarodno privatno pravo – opšti deo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  25. Stefanović, Zlatko. 1/2013. Identifikacija pravnih praznina. Pravni zapisi IV: 5–26. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap4-4057
  26. Tomić, Ivan. 2020. Tumačenje, pravne praznine i načelo zakonitosti. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Mostaru XXVIII: 106–128. https://doi.org/10.47960/2637-2495.2020.28.106
  27. Varadi, Tibor, Bernadet Bordaš, Gašo Knežević, Vladimir Pavić. 2022. Međunarodno privatno pravo. 21. izdanje. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  28. Vázquez-Bermúdez, Marcelo. 2022. Third report on general principles of law, UN. Doc. A/CN.4/753, 73rd session of the ILC. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n22/321/79/pdf/n2232179.pdf, last visited November 16, 2024.
  29. Visković, Nikola. 2001. Teorija države i prava. Zagreb: Birotehnika.
  30. Čolović, Vladimir. 2024. Primena normi u slučaju pravne praznine u međunarodnom privatnom pravu. 284–302 in Zbornik radova “Pravne praznine i punoća prava” III, edited by Dimitrije Ćeranić, Radislav Lale, Svjetlana Ivanović, Đorđe Marilović, Samir Aličić. Istočno Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu.
  31. Živković, Mirko, Sanja Marjanović. 3–4/2019. Nekoliko pitanja u vezi s primjenom međunarodnih ugovora u međunarodnom privatnom pravu Republike Srbije. Pravni vjesnik 35: 261–293. https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/8045