Чланак
дец 31
Назад

WHICH ANIMAL RIGHTS SHOULD BE RECOGNISED?

Nataša Stojanović

10.5937/AnaliPFB1603075S
САЖЕТАК /

The paper considers the issue of the possibility to award the fundamental rights to sentient animals. Taking as a starting point contemporary animal protection laws, particularly the ones in which animals are treated as human’s co-beings, the latest scientific investigations, which prove irrefutably a sizeable genetic similarity between humans and animals, but also negligible differences in intelligence and capability to communicate between themselves, as well as the change of course in individual contemporary codifications towards disallowing treating animals as things, the author advocates argumentatively for recognising the fundamental rights of animals and thereby their legal personhood. According to the author’s understanding, sentient animals should be awarded the fundamental rights corresponding to their interests, needs and species, such as: the right to life; the right to freedom; the right to not have pain, suffering and stress inflicted on them; the right to be cared after by humans; the right to acquire ownership rights; and the right to legal protection.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Bentham, Ј., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Hafner Press, New York 1948.
  • Cochrane, A., “Ownership an Justice for Animals”, Utilitas 4/2009.
  • Cochrane, A., “Do animals have an interest in liberty?”, Political Studies 3/2009.
  • Darwin, C., Čovekovo poreklo i spolno odabiranje (The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex), Matica srpska, Novi Sad 1977.
  • DeGrazia, D., Prava životinja: kratak uvod (Animal Rights: A very short introduction), TKD Šahinpašić, Sarajevo 2002.
  • Favre, D., “Living Property: A New Status for Animals within the Legal System”, Marquette Law Review 93/2010.
  • Foster, F., “Should Pets Inhherit?”, Florida Law Review 4/2011 (4).
  • Francione, G., “Animals as Property”, Animal Rights Law 2/1996.
  • Francione, G. Garner, R., The Animal Rights Debate, Abolition or Regulation?, Columbia University Press, New York 2010.
  • Griffin, D., Animal Minds: Beyond Cognition to Consciousness, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2001.
  • Јoveski, V., “Neobična životinjska inteligencija”, 2013. Retrieved from http://znanost.geek.hr/clanak/neobicna-zivotinjska-inteligencija, asp, 22. 2. 2016.
  • Jurić, H., “Veliki ciljevi i mali koraci”, Zarez 194–195/2006.
  • Lappé, M. F., Diet for a Small Planet, Ballantine Books, United States 1971.
  • Mccarthy, M. E., “Human Origins the Hybrid Hipotesis. Human Origins: Are we Hybrids?”, http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html, last visited 26 February 2016.
  • Medak, L., “Empatija kod životinja češća nego što se prije mislilo”, 2016, http://znanost.geek.hr/clanak/empatija-kod-zivotinja-cesca-nego-sto-se-prije-mislilo/#ixzz40tTmSd6e, last visited 26 February 2016.
  • Mill, J. S., “Utilitarianism”, Utilitarianism and Other Essays: J. S. Mill and Jeremy Bentham (ed. A. Ryan), Pen-guin, Harmondsworth 1987.
  • Moussaieff, M. J., McCarthy, S., Kada slonovi plaču – Emocionalni život životinja, Algoritam, Zagreb 2004.
  • Paunović, M., “Životinjska prava, Prilog proširenoj teoriji ljudskih prava”, Strani pravni život 3/2005.
  • Regan, T., Defending Animal Rights, University of Illionois Press, United States of America 2001.
  • Singer, P., Oslobođenje životinja, IBIS grafika, Zagreb 1998.
  • Singer, P., Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
  • Stevanović, Ј., Stanimirović, Z., Đelić, N., Zoologija, Fakultet veterinarske medicine, Beograd 2013.
  • Visković, N., “Stradanja, zaštita i prava životinja (Prilog raspravi o ‘trećoj generaciji prava’)”, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 5–6/1989.
  • Vodinelić, V., Građansko pravo, Uvod u građansko pravo i opšti deo građanskog prava, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union, Beograd 2014.