Članak
dec 26
Nazad

THE WIDENING GAP BETWEEN PROCLAIMED GENDER EQUALITY AND REAL STATE OF AFFAIRS IN TIMES OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Dragica Vujadinović

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22403A
SAŽETAK /

A premise of this article is that the existing gap between the advanced gender equality normative framework and the state of gender equality in real life has widened in times of crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The background theoretical-methodological framework is presented in the introduction. The first chapter presents progressive gender equality achievements in the normative and strategic international, European and national framework. The next chapter explains why all crises have been worsening gender (in)equality in real life and even within the scope of already achieved rights. The third chapter outlines the negative impacts of COVID-19 on gender equality and living conditions of women globally, in the EU and Serbia. The fourth chapter addresses how the COVID-19 pandemic could contribute to advancing gender equality. The conclusion sums up the main topics of analysis and considers challenges related to the pandemic’s possible positive impacts on gender equality.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Antonić, Slobodan. 2021. Iskušenja radikalnog feminizma, 2nd ed. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik/Catena Mundi.
  2. Banović, Damir. 2022. Queer Legal Theory. 73–93 in Feminist Approaches to Law – Theoretical and Historical Insights, edited by Dragica Vujadinović, Antonio Álvarez del Cuvillo, Susanne Strand. Heidelberg:  Springer.
  3. Beker, Kosana, Biljana Janjić, Valentina Lepojević. 2021. Report on women’s rights and gender equality in Serbia in 2020. Pančevo: FemPlatz. https://www.femplatz.org/library/reports/2021-10-18_PreneraZena_2020_EN.pdf (last visited 18 November, 2022).
  4. Browne, Evie, Huma Haider, Freyja Oddsdottir, Brigitte Rohwerder, Anna Louise Strachan. 2014. Gender in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations (Rapid Literature Review). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. https://genderandsecurity.org/sites/default/files/Browne_et_al_-_G_in_Fragile_Con-affectd_situatns_-_Lit_Review.pdf (last visited 11 November, 2022).
  5. Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2013. Beheading of the legislator: The European Crisis – Paradoxes of Constitutionalizing Democratic Capitalism. 37–54 in Identity, Political add Human Rights Culture as Prerequisites of Constitutional Democracy, edited by Miodrag Jovanović, Dragica Vujadinović. Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
  6. Campbell, Beatrice. 2013. End of Equality. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
  7. Campbell, Beatrice. 2014. Why we need a new women’s revolution. The Guardian. 25 May. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/25/we-need-new-womens-revolution (last visited 16 November, 2022).
  8. Corradetti, Claudio (ed.). 2012. Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights – Some Contemporary Views. Oxford: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2376-4
  9. Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. 2003. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-Discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. 139–167 in Critical race feminism: A reader, edited by Adrien Katherine Wing. New York: New York University Press. D. Vujadinović (p. 1017–1047) 1044 Annals BLR 4/2022
  10. European Parliament. 2022. Gender Equality in the Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)698757 (last visited 17 November, 2022).
  11. European Commission. 2 0 20. The EU’s long-term Budget and NextGenerationEU – Facts and Figures, 2021–2017. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/eus-next-long-term-budget-nextgenerationeu-key-facts-and-figures_en (last visited 17 November, 2022).
  12. European Commission. Directorate General for Justice and Consumers. 2021. 2021 Report on Gender Equality in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/aid_development_cooperation_fundamental_rights/annual_report_ge_2021_printable_en_0.pdf (last visited 30 October, 2022).
  13. European Institute for Gender Equality. 2021. Gender Equality Index 2021: Health. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equalityindex-2021-health (last visited 15 August, 2022).
  14. European Movement Ireland. 2021. EU Recovery and Gender Equality. https://www.europeanmovement.ie/eu-recovery-and-gender-equality/ (last visited 10 October, 2022).
  15. European Parliament. 2022. Gender Equality in the Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)698757 (last visited 17 November, 2022).
  16. Fennelly, David. 2018. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: Articles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 11 (CEDAW). 449–455 in International and European Labour Law – A Commentary, edited by Edoardo Ales, Mark Bell, Olaf Deinert, and Sophie Robin- Olivier. Baden-Baden – München – Oxford – Portland: Nomos – Verlag C.H. Beck – Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845266190-465
  17.  Government of Serbia website. 2021. Usvojena Strategija za rodnu ravnopravnost od 2021. do 2030. godine. 14 October. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/vest/582820/usvojena-strategija-za-rodnu-ravnopravnostod-2021-do-2030-godine.php (last visited 17 November, 2022).
  18. Grayzel, Susan. 2014. Changing lives: gender expectations and roles during and after World War One. British Library. 29 January https://www.bl.uk/world-war-one/articles/changing-lives-gender-expectations (last visited 14 October, 2022).
  19. Hammersley, Haydn. 2021. Common Provisions Regulation 2021–2027: Analysis of the final agreement. https://www.edf-feph.org/content/uploads/2021/06/Analysis-of-the-final-Common-Provisions-Regulation-agreement-2021-2027-1.docx (last visited 18 November, 2022).
  20. Higgins, Charlotte. 2018. The Age of Patriarchy: how an unfashionable idea became a rallying cry for feminism today. The Guardian. 22 June. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jun/22/the-age-of-patriarchy-how-an-unfashionable-idea-became-a-rallying-cry-for-feminism-today (last visited 30 September, 2022).
  21. Hozić, Aida, Jacqui True (eds.) 2016. Scandalous Economics: Gender and the Politics of Financial Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204235.001.0001
  22. Human Rights Directorate. 2020. Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025. https://humanrights.gov.mt/en/Pages/Gender%20Equality/European%20Affairs/Gender-Equality-Strategy-2020-2025.aspx (last visited 15 October, 2022).
  23. Jepsen, Maria. 2021. Good News for Gender equality as we exit the COVID-19 crisis?. Eurofound. 28 April. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/lt/publications/blog/good-news-for-gender-equality-as-we-exit-the-covid-19-crisis (last visit 1 October, 2022).
  24. Klatzer, Elisabeth, Azzura Rinaldi. 2020. Next Generation EU leaves women behind. Gender Impact Assessment on the EC proposal for #nextGenerationEU. The Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament. https://alexandrageese.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Gender-Impact-Assessment-NextGenerationEU_Klatzer_Rinaldi_2020.pdf (last visited 30 October, 2022).
  25. McEuen, Melissa A. 2016. Women, Gender, and World War II. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.55 (last visited 16 November, 2022).
  26. Moyn, Samuel. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, Mass. – London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  27. Observatory European Charter for Equality of Women and Men in Local Life. 2020. The European Union and Gender Equality. https://charter-equality.eu/the-charter/the-eu-and-gender-equality.html (last visited 14 October, 2022).
  28. Oxfam International. 2021. 5 ways women and girls have been the hardest hit by Covid-19. https://www.oxfam.org/en/5-ways-women-and-girls-have-been-hardest-hit-covid-19 (last visited 12 October, 2022). D. Vujadinović (p. 1017–1047) 1046 Annals BLR 4/2022
  29. Pajvančić, Marijana, Nevena Petrušić, Sanja Nikolin, Aleksandra Vladisavljević, Višnja Bacanović. 2020. Rodna analiza odgovora na COVID-19 u Republici Srbiji. Belgrade: OSCE Mission in Serbia – Ženska platfoma za razvoj Srbije 2014–2020.
  30. Pearson, Ruth, Caroline Sweetman. 2011. Gender and the Economic Crisis. Oxford: Oxfam. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440200.000
  31. Saedziadeh, Zara. 2022. Feminist Methodologies and Gender Research. In Gender Competent Legal Knowledge, edited by Dragica Vujadinović, Mareike Froehlich and Thomas Giegerich. Heidelberg: Springer.
  32. Seguino, Stephanie. 2/2010. The Global Economic Crisis, its Gender and Ethnic Implications, and Policy Responses. Gender&Development 18: 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2010.491318
  33. Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Unit, Serbian Government. 2020. Posledice COVID-19 pandemije na prihode i potrošnju domaćinstava iz perspektive osetljivih grupa. https://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/rs/posledice-covid-19-pandemije-na-prihode-i-potrosnju-domacinstava-iz-perspektive-osetljivih-grupa/ (last visited 13 October, 2022).
  34. Vujadinović, Dragica. 1995. Civlno društvo i svakodnevni život – Slučaj Srbije. 303–329 in Potisnuto civilno društvo, edited by Vukašin Pavlović. Belgrade: EKO centar.
  35. Vujadinović, Dragica. 2013. Human Rights: A Dworkinian View. 95– 117 in Identity, Political and Human Rights Culture as Prerequisities of Constitutional Democracy, edited by Miodrag A. Jovanović and Dragica Vujadinović. Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
  36. Vujadinović, Dragica, Vojislav Stanimirović. 2016. Rodni odnosi u Srbiji u doba tranzicije – između emancipacije i retradicionalizacije. 189–215 in Demokratska tranzicija Srbije – (Re)kapitulacija prvih 25 godina, edited by Bojan Vranić, Goran Dajović. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet.
  37. Vujadinović, Dragica. 2017. Teorijsko -metodološki okvir za razumevanje rodnih odnosa – slučaj Srbije. 99–111 in Pravni kapaciteti Srbije za evropske integracije, edited by Stevan Lilić. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet u Beogradu.
  38. UN Women. 2014. The Global Economic Crisis and Gender Equality. New York: UN Women.
  39. Vujadinović, Dragica. 2019. Rod i pravna regulativa. 97–115 in Studije roda, edited by Dragica Vujadinović and Vojislav Stanimirović. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet.
  40. Vujadinović, Dragica 2020. Od antičke teorije prirodnog prava do savremene teorije ljudskih prava – moguće promišljanje kontinuiteta i diskontinuiteta. 62–79 in vol. 10 Perspektive implementacije evropskih standardau pravni sistem Srbije, edited by Stevan Lilić. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet.
  41. Vujadinović, Dragica. 2022. Feminist Reconsideration of Political Theories. 1–31 in Feminist Approaches to Law – Theoretical and Historical Insights, edited by Dragica Vujadinović, Antonio Álvarez del Cuvillo, Susanne Strand. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14781-4_1
  42. Verdu Sanmartin, Amalia. 2022. The Concept of Gender in Law. 31–53 in Feminist Approaches to Law – Theoretical and Historical Insights, edited by Dragica Vujadinović, Antonio Álvarez del Cuvillo, Susanne Strand. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14781-4_2
  43. Wing, Adrien K., Caroline Pappalardo. 2022. Critical Race Feminism: A Different Approach to Feminist Theory. 53–73 in Feminist Approaches to Law – Theoretical and Historical Insights, edited by Dragica Vujadinović,  Antonio Álvarez del Cuvillo, Susanne Strand. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14781-4_3
  44. World Economic Forum. 2021. Global Gender Gap Report 2021. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf (last visited 18 September, 2021).