Članak
mar 31
Nazad

OČUVANJE BIODIVERZITETA I PRAVO INTELEKTUALNE SVOJINE: KONCEPTUALNI NESPORAZUM

Slobodan Marković

10.5937/AnaliPFB1701007M
SAŽETAK /

Autor je postavio tezu o konceptualnom neskladu između prava intelektualne svojine i ciljeva Konvencije o zaštiti biodiverziteta. Teza je razrađena kao analiza: a) problema na nivou pojedinih instituta patentnog prava i prava zaštite genetskih resursa i tradicionalnog znanja, b) javnih politika podsticanja tehnološkog razvoja i konzervacije biodiverziteta i v) sukoba ideoloških vrednosti iz kojih su te javne politike ppoizašle. Zaključak je da se u centru problema nalazi različit i protivrečan pravni, politički i ideološki tretman javnog domena, zavisno od toga da li se na njega gleda iz ugla interesa razvijenog ili tzv. trećeg sveta.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici  
REFERENCE /
  • Bratspies, R., „The New Discovery Doctrine: Some Thoughts on Property Rights and Traditional Knowledge“, American Indian Law Review 2/2007.
  • Finston, S., „The Relevance of Genetic Resourses to the Pharmaceutical Industry“, Journal of World Intellectual Property 2/2005.
  • Fowler, C., „Protecting Farmer Innovation: The Convention on Biological Diversity“, Jurimetrics 41/2001.
  • Ho, C., „Biopiracy and Beyond: A Consideration of Socio-Cultural Conflicts with Global Patent Policies“, University of Michigen Journal of Law Reform 39/2006.
  • Saks, Dž., Doba održivog razvoja, Beograd 2014. (Saks, Dž., Doba održivog razvoja, Beograd 2014)
  • Sampath, P., Regulating Bioprospecting – Institutions for Drug Research, Access and Benefit Sharing, United Nations University, 2005.
  • Srinivas, K., „Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights: A Note on Issues, Some Solutions and Some Suggestions“, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 3/2008, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1140623, april 2016.
  • Swanson, T., „The Economics of the Biodiversity Convention“, University of Cambridge Disusssion Paper GEC 92–08, http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gec_1992_08.pdf, mart 2016.
  • Ullrich, H., „Traditional Knowledge, Biodiversity, Benefit-Sharing and the Patent System: Romantics v. Economics“, European University Institute Working Paper 7/2005, Florence.
  • UNCTAD-ICDS, Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Geneva 2005.
  • Vogel, J. H. (ed.) The Museum of Bioprospecting, Intellectual Property and the Public Domain: A Place, A Process, A Philosophy, London 2010.
  • WIPO, Second Revision of the Consolidated Document Related to Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources WO/GA/48/9, 2016.
  • WIPO, The Protection of Traditional Knowledge – Draft Gap Analysis (dokument WIPO/GRTKF/IC/13/5(b)rev., Annex I), Geneva 2008, www.wipo.int/tk/en/igc/gap-analyses.html, april 2016.
  • World Trade Organization, The Relationship Between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity – Summary of Issues Raised and Points Made, IP/C/W/368/Rev. 1, 2006.