Чланак
јун 19
Назад

INTERIM MEASURES IN ARBITRATION: THE SERBIAN PERSPECTIVE

Maja STANIVUKOVIĆ

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_25202A
САЖЕТАК /

This paper discusses interim measures that can be ordered by Serbian arbitral tribunals and the possibility of their domestic enforcement. The introduction examines the legal framework for interim measures under Serbian law and the arbitration rules that govern the majority of arbitrations in Serbia. Subsequent chapters discuss the interpretation of the domestic legislation available to the courts and arbitrators in Serbia when facing legal gaps concerning interim measures. The best practices are identified by using comparative legal models, paving the way for optimal judicial and arbitral decisions and better legislative solutions in the future. In the second chapter, the limits of the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction to order interim measures are determined based on a hypothetical example. The third chapter focuses on the decision-making process, types, conditions, and judicial enforcement of interim measures by domestic arbitral tribunals. The conclusion highlights the limited interpretative possibilities, which supports the need for legislative amendment.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Ћирилици   Латиници   Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  1. Berg, Albert van den. 2001. The 1958 New York Convention revisited. 125–146 in Arbitral Tribunal or state courts: who must defer to whom?, edited by Pierre A. Karrer. Association Suisse de l’arbitrage.
  2. Bodiroga, Nikola. 2024. Novi izvršni postupak. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  3. Boog, Christopher. 2018. Article 183 PILS. 157–167 in Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide, 2d ed., edited by Manuel Arroyo. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  4. Born, Gary. 2020. International Commercial Arbitration. 3d ed. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  5. Brekoulakis, Stavros L., John Ribeiro, Laurence Shore. 2015. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985/2006. 835–910 in Concise International Arbitration, 2nd edition, edited by Loukas A. Mistelis. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  6. Dika, Mihailo. 2016. Marginalije uz nagoviještene pravce reforme hrvatskog arbitražnog prava. 372–408 in Liber Amicorum Gašo Knežević. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu; Belgrade: Udruženje za arbitražno pravo.
  7. Ehle, Bernd. 2019. Article I. 25–82 in New York Convention, Article-by-Article Commentary, 2d ed., edited by Reinmar Wolff. Munich: Beck – Hart Publishing – Nomos.
  8. Gaillard, Emmanuel, George A. Bermann (eds.). 2017. Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: New York, 1958. Leiden: Brill.
  9. Gómez, Manuel A. 2020. Recognition and Enforcement. 453–473 in UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Pietro Ortolani, Shahla Ali, Manuel A. Gómez and Michael Polkinghorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Holtzmann, Howard M., Joseph E. Neuhaus, Edda Kristjansdottir, Thomas W. Walsh. 2015. A Guide to the 2006 Amendments to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  11. Knežević, Gašo, Vladimir Pavić. 2009. Arbitraža i ADR. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  12. Knežević, Marko. 1–2/2008b. O pojmu i značaju arbitrabilnosti. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 42: 873–892.
  13. Knežević, Marko. 6/2008a. O privremenim merama arbitražnog suda. Glasnik advokatske komore Vojvodine 86: 271–283.
  14. Kojović, Tijana. 5/2001. Court Enforcement of Arbitral Decisions on Provisional Relief: How Final is Provisional? Journal of International Arbitration 18: 511–532.
  15. Krvavac, Marija, Jelena Belović. 4–6/2017. Privremene mere i arbitražno rešavanje sporova. Pravo i privreda 55: 447–460.
  16. Lew, Julian D. M., Loukas A. Mistelis, Stefan M. Kröll. 2003. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  17. Mitrović, Dobrosav. 2006. Zakon o arbitraži Republike Srbije. Arbitraža 4: 79–84.
  18. Nacrt zakona o arbitraži. 2006. Arbitraža 4: 109.
  19. Ortolani, Pietro. 2020. Power of Arbitral Tribunal to Order Interim Measures. 314–342 in UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Pietro Ortolani, Shahla Ali, Manuel A. Gómez and Michael Polkinghorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Pavić, Vladimir, Milena Đorđević. 2016. Resolution of International Commercial Disputes Before Serbian Arbitral Institutions – Certain Salient Features of the New Institutional Rules. 304–346 in Liber amicorum Gašo Knežević. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu; Belgrade: Udruženje za arbitražno pravo.
  21. Poudret, Jean-François, Sébastien Besson. 2007. Comparative Law of International Arbitration. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  22. Poznić, Borivoje. 1973. Postupak izbranog suda. 45–164 in Arbitražno rešavanje sporova, edited by Siniša Triva, Borivoje Poznić, Nikola Vorgić and Tibor Varadi. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
  23. Schäfer, Jan K. 2015. §1041 – Interim Measures of Protection. 215–237 in Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice, 2d ed., edited by Patricia Nacimento, Stefan M. Kröll and Karl-Heinz Bockstiegal. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  24. Stanivuković, Maja. 11/2015. Obavezno dejstvo odluke Odbora za rešavanje sporova (DAB-a) po Opštim uslovima FIDIK-a. Pravni život 64: 191–205.
  25. Stanivuković, Maja. 2013. Međunarodna arbitraža. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik.
  26. Stanivuković, Maja. 2018. Adjudication as a preliminary step to arbitration: a case of first impression in Serbia. 137–166 in Harmonizacija srpskog i mađarskog prava sa pravom Evropske unije Vol. VI. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
  27. Stanivuković, Maja, Vladimir Pavić. 1/2021. Predlog za izmene i dopune zakona koji uređuju arbitražu i pitanja od značaja za arbitražu radi celovitog uređenja materije. Branič 2021: 11–22.
  28. UNCITRAL. 1994. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985. Vienna: United Nations.
  29. UNCITRAL. 2008. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 (with amendments as adopted in 2006). Vienna: United Nations.
  30. UNCITRAL. 2011. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (as revised in 2010). New York: United Nations.
  31. UNCITRAL. 2012. 2012 Digest of Case Law on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. New York: United Nations.