Članak
dec 26
Nazad

ICJ DISCRETIONARY POWERS: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM V. RESTRAINT IN THE ADVISORY OPINION ON KOSOVO

Nadia ASAAD

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_25402A
SAŽETAK /

In response to Serbia’s request, the United Nations General Assembly sought an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice regarding the legality of Kosovo’s 2008 unilateral declaration of independence. Employing a conceptual framework grounded in judicial activism and restraint, this analysis critically examines the Court’s inconsistent exercise of its discretionary powers, applied in stretching and retracting both the scope of the question posed, as well as its own judicial propriety. The Court’s selective engagement with these legal questions reveals an underlying judicial strategy: one that avoids unresolved ambiguities, reflects implicit views on statehood, and navigates the uneasy space international law occupies between norm entrepreneurship and the Court’s commitment to apolitical neutrality and political restraint. Tracing the Court’s reasoning through this lens offers insight into the multifaceted drivers of its interpretive approach to politically sensitive issues, and ultimately, to the evolution of international law.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Ayoub, Leoni. 1/2022. Judicial Activism in the Evolution of a Judicial Function for the International Courts: The Role of Compétence de la Compétence. Netherlands International Law Review 69: 29–55.
  2. BADIL. 2024. The Gaps and Failures of the ICJ’s 2024 Advisory Opinion on Palestine. https://badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2024/10/25/positionpaper-on-icj-advisory-opinion-1729852065.pdf, last visited November 5, 2025.
  3. Bancroft, Ian. 2011. The International Position of Kosovo after the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice. IEMed Yearbook. https://www.iemed.org/publication/the-international-position-of-kosovo-after-the-advisory-opinion-of-the-international-Court-of-justice/, last visited October 11, 2025.
  4. Barlovac, Bojana, Petrit Çollaku. 2010. Both Kosovo, Serbia Confident on Eve of ICJ Opinion. BalkanInsight, 21 July. https://balkaninsight.com/2010/07/21/both-kosovo-serbia-confident-on-eve-of-icj-opinion/, last visited November 5, 2025.
  5. Bianco, Giuseppe. 2/2010. And Nothing Else Matters: The ICJ’s Judicial Restraint in Its Opinion on Kosovo’s Independence. Perspectives on Federalism 2: 2–6.
  6. Bodansky, Daniel. 2006. Non Liquet. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Bosco, David. 2014. Rough justice: The International Criminal Court in a world of power politics. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Brunk, Ingrid, Monica Hakimi. 2024. The Prohibition of Annexations and ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. EJIL:Talk!, 22 July. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-prohibition-of-annexations-and-icjs-advisory-opinion-on-the-occupied-palestinian-territory/, last visited November 5, 2025.
  9. B92. 2010. RS: ICJ decision and secession. B92, 25 July. https://www.b92.net/o/eng/news/region-article?yyyy=2010&mm=07&dd=25&nav_id=68674, last visited November 7, 2025.
  10. Caplan, Richard. 2010. The ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Kosovo. United States Institute of Peace, 17 September. https://www.usip.org/publications/2010/09/icjs-advisory-opinion-kosovo, last visited October 12, 2025.
  11. Ćirković, Elena. 7–8/2019. An Analysis of the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence. German Law Journal 11: 895–912.
  12. Christie, Emily. 2010. Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of ‘Kosovo’, ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010, General List No. 141. Australian International Law Journal 17: 205–212.
  13. Essawy, Rana Moustafa. 2024. The Attainability of the Evidentiary Standard for Genocidal Intent in Gaza. EJIL:Talk!, 3 May. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-attainability-of-the-evidentiary-standard-for-genocidal-intent-in-gaza/, last visited October 12, 2025.
  14. Ferragamo, Mariel, Diana Roy. 2025. The Quest for Palestinian Statehood: What to Know. Council on Foreign Relations, 23 September. https://www.cfr.org/article/quest-palestinian-statehood-what-know, last visited November 7, 2025.
  15. Frydlinger, David. 2025. Closing the Silences: Using the ICJ’s Interpretive Method to Read Its Climate Opinion. Climate Law Blog, 29 August. https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2025/08/29/closing-the-silences-using-the-icjs-interpretive-method-to-read-its-climate-opinion/, last visited November 5, 2025.
  16. Hannum, Hurst. 1/2011. The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: An Opportunity Lost, or a Poisoned Chalice Refused? Leiden Journal of International Law 24: 155–157.
  17. Higgins, Rosalyn. 2009. Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Hilpold, Peter. 2011. The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: Different Perspectives of a Delicate Question. Austrian Review of International and European Law 14.
  19. Hjort, Audun Lunnan. 2019. International Courts’ Approach to Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions. Master’s Thesis, University of Oslo.
  20. Jovanović, Miodrag A. 3/2012. After the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: The Future of Self-Determination Conflicts. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 60: 292–317.
  21. Kmiec, Keenan D. 5/2004. The Origin and Current Meanings of “Judicial Activism.” California Law Review 92: 1441–1478.
  22. Kooijmans, Pieter. 4/2007. The ICJ in the 21st Century: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, or Proactive Judiciary. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56: 741–754.
  23. Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Lepard, Brian D. 2010. Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Mawar, Deepak. 3/2019. The Perils of Judicial Restraint: How Judicial Activism Can Help Evolve the International Court of Justice. Goettingen Journal of International Law 9: 427–448.
  26. McWhinney, Edward. n.d. Judicial Activism and the International Court of Justice. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. https://legal.un.org/avl/ls/McWhinney_CT.html, last visited November 5, 2025.
  27. McWhinney, Edward. 1/2006. The International Court of Justice and International Law-Making: The Judicial Activism/Self-Restraint Antinomy. Chinese Journal of International Law 5: 3–13.
  28. McWhinney, Edward. 2010. Judicial Activism and the International Court of Justice. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, Lecture Series. Video, 1st lecture. https://legal.un.org/avl/ls/McWhinney_CT_video_1.html, last visited November 6, 2025.
  29. Milanović, Marko. 2015. Arguing the Kosovo Case. 1–45 in The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, edited by Marko Milanović and Michael Wood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Milanović, Marko. 2024. ICJ Delivers Advisory Opinion on the Legality of Israel’s Occupation of Palestinian Territories, EJIL:Talk!, 20 July. https://www.ejiltalk.org/icj-delivers-advisory-opinion-on-the-legality-of-israels-occupation-of-palestinian-territories/, last visited November 5, 2025.
  31. Mrázek, Jiří. 4/2022. The International Court of Justice and Its Powers to Judicial Review of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions. The Lawyer Quarterly 12: 393–407.
  32. Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2011. The International Court’s Advisory Opinion on the UDI in Respect of Kosovo: Washing Away the “Foam on the Tide of Time”? Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 15: 65–104.
  33. Papić, Tatjana. 2015. Political Aftermath of the ICJ AO on Kosovo. 240–267 in The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, edited by Marko Milanović and Michael Wood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Pratap, Ravindra. 2023. Geography and Legal Culture of ICJ Judges and Their Consideration of Erga Omnes Obligations. 197–224 in The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2022, edited by Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
  35. Röben, Volker. 3/2010. The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo: Rules or Principles? Goettingen Journal of International Law 2: 1065–1086.
  36. Sthoeger, Eran. 2023. Symposium on the Contours and Limits of Advisory Opinions: Rejection, Implementation, and What Lies in Between. American Journal of International Law Unbound 117: 292–297.
  37. Stravridi, Myrto. 4/2024. The Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice: Are States Resorting to Advisory Proceedings as a “Soft” Litigation Strategy? Journal of Public and International Affairs 22: 1–25.
  38. Wewerinke-Singh, Margaretha. 2025. Harmonizing Sources, Hardening Duties – Inside the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Climate Change. Climate Law: A Sabin Center blog, 11 August. https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2025/08/11/harmonizing-sources-hardening-duties-inside-the-icjs-advisory-opinion-on-climate-change/, last visited November 5, 2025.
  39. Yee, Sienho. 4/2010. Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 4): The Kosovo Advisory Opinion. Chinese Journal of International Law 9: 763–782.
  40. Yildiz, Ezgi. 1/2020. A Court with Many Faces: Judicial Characters and Modes of Norm Development in the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law 31: 73–99.
  41. Zarbiyev, Fuad. 2/2012. Judicial Activism in International Law: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3: 247–278.