Članak
dec 31
Nazad

EQUALITY ADDS QUALITY: ON UPGRADING HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF LAW

Susanne Baer

10.5937/AnaliPFB1704005B
SAŽETAK /

Much has been attempted, and many projects are still underway aimed at achieving equality in higher education and research. Today, the key argument to demand and support the integration of gender in academia is that equality is indeed about the quality on which academic work is supposed to be based. Although more or less national political, social and cultural contexts matter as much as academic environments, regarding higher education and research, the integration of gender into the field of law seems particularly interesting. Faculties of law enjoy a certain standing and status, are closely connected to power and politics, and are likely to feature resistance to equality efforts, both in the law itself and in the curriculum and research agenda. However, a multidimensional, intersectional gender analysis helps to reframe cases and doctrines, rulings and regulations far beyond the law that evidently affects women, which the headscarf controversies illustrate. In addition to gender competence, team diversity is a procedural device for success, and non-discrimination is a key requirement when diversity is meant to work. After all, such efforts – to expose bias and educate about gender in an academic field, to insist and integrate it continuously, and to not only demand but also do it – produce quality. Thus, gender equality is crucial for the achievement of the best possible results in higher education and research.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  • Baer, S., “Intersectional discrimination and fundamental rights in Germany”, Sociologia del diritto 2/2016.
  • Baer, S., “Justitia ohne Augenbinde? Zur Kategorie Geschlecht in der Rechtswissenschaft”, Recht und Geschlecht ‒ zwischen Gleichberechtigung, Gleichstellung und Differenz (eds. M. Koreuber, U. Mage), Nomos, Baden Baden 2004.
  • Baer, S., Elsuni, S., “Feministische Rechtstheorien”, Handbuch Rechtsphilosophie, Springer, 2017.
  • Baer, S., Keim, J., Nowottnick, L., “Intersectionality in Gender Training”, 2009, http://www.quing.eu/files/WHY/baer_keim_nowottnick.pdf.
  • Bartlett, K., Rhode, D., Grossman, J., Gender and Law: Theory, Doctrine, Commentary, Kluwer, 2016.
  • Bello, B., “Multiple Discrimination Between the EU Agenda and Civic Engagement: The Long Road of Intersec-tional Perspective”, Women’s Studies 13/2010.
  • Bender, L., “Teaching Torts as if Gender Matters: Intentional Torts”, Virginia J Soc. Pol’y & L 2/1994.
  • Berghahn, S., “Wozu Gender-Aspekte in Lehre und Forschung von Rechtsfächern? – Über blinde Flecken und verkannte Professionalisierungschancen”, Kompetenzen für zeitgemäßes Public Management (Hrsg. D. Luck-Schneider, E. Kraatz Hrsg.), Nomos, 2014.
  • Bleckmann, F., “Grundlagen und Themen einer kritischen Rechtsdidaktik”, Kritische Justiz 49/2016.
  • Blome, E., et al. (eds.), Handbuch zur Gleichstellungspolitik an Hochschulen:Von der Frauenförderung zum Diversity Management?, Springer, 2014.
  • Charlesworth, H., “Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations”, Harvard Hum Rights J. 18/2005.
  • Chebout, L., Gather, S., Valentiner, D-S., “Sexismus in der juristischen Ausbildung. Ein Aufschrei dreier Na-chwuchsjuristinnen”, Zeit­schrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes 19/2016.
  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., McCall, L., “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38/2013.
  • Cole, M. (ed.), Education, Equality and Human Rights: Issues of Gender, ‘Race’, Sexuality, Disability and Social Class, Routledge, 2017.
  • Crawford, B., Infanti, A., Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • Dark, C., “Incorporating Issues of Race, Gender, Class, Sexual Orientation, and Disability into Law School Teach-ing”, Willamette L. Rev. 32/1996.
  • Dorsen, N., et al., Comparative Constitutionalism, West Academic, 20163.
  • Douglas, H., Bartlett, F., Luker, T., Hunter R. (eds.), Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law, Hart Publishing, 2014.
  • Dowd, N., Nunn, K. B., Pendergast, J. E., “Diversity Matters: Race, Gender, and Ethnicity in Legal Education”, U. Florida JL & Pub. Policy 15/2003.
  • Eickhoff, V., Schmitt, L., “Herausforderungen hochschulischer Diversity-Politik”, Managing Diversity (eds. K. Fereidooni, A. P. Zeoli), Springer, 2016.
  • Enright, M., McCandless, J., O’Donoghue A. (eds.), Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity, Hart Publishing, 2017.
  • Filipović, A., “Resonant masculinities: affective co-production of sound, space, and gender in the everyday life of Belgrade, Serbia”, NORMA 2017.
  • Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage Books, 1977.
  • Frehill L., et al. (eds.), Advancing Women in Science, Springer, 2015.
  • German Research Foundation – DFG, “Research Oriented Standards in Gender Equality”, www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/equal_opportunities/research_oriented/.
  • Graycar, R., “The Gender of Judgments: Some Reflections on ‘Bias’“, University of British Columbia Law Review 32/1998.
  • Graycar, R., Morgan, J., “On The Hidden Gender of Law: A Public Talk”, Australian Feminist LJ 41/2015.
  • Graycar, R., Morgan, J., The Hidden Gender of Law, Federation Press 2002.
  • Hart, M., “The More Things Change-Exploring Solutions to Persisting Discrimination in Legal Academia”, Colum-bia J. Gender & L. 31/2015.
  • Hearn, J., “Men and Gender Equality ‒ Resistance, Responsibilities and Reaching Out”, Örebro, Sweden, 2001, https://www.atria.nl/epublications/2001/Men_and_gender_equality.pdf.
  • Hearn, J., Men of the World Genders, Globalizations, Transnational Times, SAGE 2015.
  • Ho, D. E., Kelman, M. G., “Does Class Size Affect the Gender gap? A Natural Experiment in Law”, J of Legal Studies 43/2014.
  • Hunter, R., “The Power of Feminist Judgments?”, Feminist Legal Studies 20(2)/2012.
  • Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., Rackley E. (eds.), Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice, Hart Publishing, 2010.
  • Husu, L., Advancing Gender Equality in Nordic Academia: Political will and Persistent Paradoxes, XVIII World Congress of Sociology, 2014, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268085220_Advancing_Gender_Equality_in_Nordic_Academia_Political_Will_and_Persistent_Paradoxes.
  • Ignjatović, S., Bošković, A., “Gender Equality in Serbia”, Gender Equality in a Global Perspective, Routledge, 2017.
  • Irving H. (ed.), Constitutions and Gender, Cheltenham – Northampton 2017.
  • Janevic, J., Jankovic, J., Bradley, E., “Socioeconomic position, gender, and inequalities in self-rated health be-tween Roma and non-Roma in Serbia”, International Journal of Public Health 57/2012.
  • Kant, I., Der Streit der Fakultäten, Anthropologie in pragmatischer Einsicht, Berlin – New York 1907; in English “The Conflict of the Faculties/Der Streit der Fakultäten” (trans. M. J. Gregor), New York 1979.
  • Klein, S., et al., (eds.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education, Routledge, 2014 (1st ed. 1985).
  • Knop K., (ed.), Gender and Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2004;
  • Lembke, U., (ed.), Menschenrechte und Geschlecht, Nomos, 2014.
  • Levit, N., “Legal Storytelling: The theory and the Practice – Reflective Writing Across the Curriculum”, J of Legal Writing Institute 15/2009.
  • Limbach, J., “Wie männlich ist die Rechtswissenschaft?”, Wie männlich ist die Wissenschaft? (Hrsg. K. Hausen, H. Nowotny), Suhrkamp, 1986.
  • Lombardo, E., Mergaert, L., “Gender Mainstreaming and Resistance to Gender Training: A Framework for Study-ing Implementation”, NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21/2013.
  • Lorde, A., “The Master’s Tool Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House”, The Bridge Called My Back: Writings of Radical Women of Color (eds. Ch. Moraga, G. Anzaldua), Kitchen Table Press, New York 1983, http://bixby.ucla.edu/journal_club/Lorde_s2.pdf.
  • MacKinnon, C. A., Are Women Human?, Belknap Press, 2006.
  • Mann, P., “Dimensions of Justice in 21st Century Legal Practice and Law School Pedagogies”, Charleston L. Rev. 9/2014.
  • Matsuda, M., “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story”, Michigan L Rev 87/1989.
  • Menon, N., Rodgers, Y., Kennedy, A. R., “Land Reform and Welfare in Vietnam: Why Gender of the Land‐Rights Holder Matters”, J of International Development 29/2017.
  • Milovanovic, O., Radevic, S., Jovanovic, M., “Legal Framework and Retirement Policies in Serbia from 1990 to 2016 – Gendered Perspective”, Frontiers in Public Health 2016.
  • Moller Okin, S., Justice, Gender and the Family, Basic Books, 1989.
  • Morgenthal, L., “August Geil und Frieda Lüstlein: der Autor und sein Tätertyp”, Kritische Justiz 16/1983.
  • Mückenberger, U., Spangenberg, U., Warncke, K., Familienförderung und Gender Mainstreaming im Steuerrecht, Nomos, 2007.
  • Nacevska, E., Lokar, S., “The Effectiveness of Gender Quotas in Macedonia, Serbia and Croatia.” Teorija i Praksa 54(2)/2017.
  • Pabst, F., Slupik, V., “Das Frauenbild im zivilrechtlichen Schulfall”, Kritische Justiz 10/1977.
  • Petrušić, N., Konstantinović-Vilić, S., Porodičnopravna zaštita od nasilja u porodici u pravosudnoj praksi Srbije, Beograd – Niš 2010.
  • Reay, D., “Cultural capitalists and academic habitus: Classed and gendered labour in UK higher education”, Wom-en’s Studies Int’l Forum 27/2004.
  • Rhode, D. L., “Missing Questions: Feminist Perspectives on Legal Education”, Stanford L. Rev. 45/1992.
  • Rubio-Marín, R., Chang, W. C., “Sites of constitutional struggle for women’s equality”, Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law, Routledge, 2013.
  • Scherr, A., El-Mafaalani, A., Yüksel, G., (eds.), Handbuch Diskriminierung, Springer, 2017.
  • Schiebinger, L., Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering, 2008, https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/.
  • Schiek, D., Chege, V., (eds.), European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidi-mensional Equality Law, Routledge, 2009.
  • Schultz, U., Shaw G., (eds.), Gender and Judging, Oñati International Series in Law and Society, Hart Publishing, 2013.
  • Schultz, U., Shaw G., (eds.), Women in the Legal Profession, Hart Publishing, 2003.
  • Schweigler, D., “Marginalized in the Name of the Law”, Max Planck Research 4/2014.
  • Shalleck, A., “Report of the Women and the Law Project: Gender Bias and the Law School Curriculum”, J of Le-gal Education 38/1988.
  • Smart, C., Feminism and the Power of Law, Routledge, 1989.
  • Spangenberg, U., Wersig, M., (eds.), Geschlechtergerechtigkeit steuern: Perspektivenwechsel im Steuerrecht, No-mos, 2013.
  • Stanchi, K. M., Crawford, B. J., Berger L. L., (eds.), Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • Temme, G., Künzel C., (Hrsg.), Hat Strafrecht ein Geschlecht?: zur Deutung und Bedeutung der Kategorie Ge-schlecht in strafrechtlichen Diskursen vom 18. Jahrhundert bis heute, Bielefeld 2010.
  • Towfigh, E., Traxler, C., Glöckner, A., “Zur Benotung in der Examensvorbereitung und im ersten Examen”, ZDRW 1/2014.
  • Valdes, F., “Outsider Jurisprudence, Critical Pedagogy and Social Justice Activism: Marking the Stirrings of Criti-cal Legal Education”, Asian LJ 10/2003.
  • Valentiner, D-S., (Geschlechter) Rollenstereotype in juristischen Ausbildungsfällen, Hamburg 2017.
  • Valentiner, D-S., “Genderkompetenz im rechtswissenschaftlichen Studium”, ZDRW 2/2016.
  • Verloo, Cf. M., “Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Eu-rope Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality”, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12/2005.
  • Vujadinovic, D., “Family Structures and Civil Society Perspectives in Present-Day Serbia”, The Golden Chain: Family, Civil Society, and the State (eds. P. Ginsbourg et al.), Berghahn Books, 2011.