Članak
dec 20
Nazad

ARBITRATION IN SMART CONTRACTS DISPUTES – A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE

Stefan JOVANOVIĆ

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23405A
SAŽETAK /

The paper explores the growing integration of blockchain technology in the legal field, specifically focusing on the emergence of smart contracts with their automated execution of contractual obligations. Technology experts believe that the use of smart contracts contributes to the eradication of disputes. However, the author challenges this claim while analyzing the disputes that may arise in this area, including classic contract law disputes and new issues specific to smart contracts. The paper focuses on whether arbitration is the optimal forum for resolving these disputes. The relationship between traditional and blockchain arbitration is explored, examining disputes that would be resolved using established methods and those suitable for the newly created mechanism. The interests of traditional arbitration do not coincide with those of blockchain arbitration. Both should cooperate and take advantage of each other. The author asserts that the flexibility and adaptability of arbitration will be its dominant advantage in addressing these disputes.

ČLANAK JE RASPOLOŽIV NA /
Ćirilici   Latinici   Engleskom  
REFERENCE /
  1. Athanassiou, Phoebus L. 3/2019. Tokens and the regulation of distributed ledger technologies: where Europe stood in the last quarter of 2018. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation 34: 105.
  2. Benton, Gary L. 2017. Technology Dispute Resolution Survey Highlights US and International Arbitration Perceptions, Misperceptions and Opportunities. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/10/28/technology-dispute-resolution-survey-highlights-us-international-arbitration-perceptions-misperceptions-opportunities/ (last visited 16 April 2023).
  3. Chevalier, Maxime. 2022. Arbitration Tech Toolbox: Is a Mexican Court Decision the First Stone to Bridging the Blockchain Arbitral Order with National Legal Orders? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/03/04/arbitration-tech-toolbox-is-a-mexican-court-decision-the-first-stone-to-bridging-the-blockchain-arbitral-order-with-national-legal-orders/ (last visited 21 April 2023).
  4. Cvetković, Predrag, 87/2020. Blokčejn kao pravni fenomen – Uvodna razmatranja. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 59: 134–137. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-24414
  5. Cvetković, Predrag. 2/2023, Algoritmiranje prava: Ilustracija mogućih pristupa. Pravo i privreda 61: 2. https://doi.org/10.55836/PiP_23205A
  6. Cvetković, Predrag. 81/2018. Pravo i teorija igara – Primer prava Svetske trgovinske organizacije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 57: 90–94. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1881083C
  7. Duke, Anna. 1/2019. What Does the CISG Have to Say About Smart Contracts? A Legal Analysis. Chicago Journal of International Law 20: 141–177.
  8. Durovic, Mateja, André Janssen. 2019. Formation of Smart Contracts Under Contract Law. 61–79 in The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms, edited by Larry A. DiMatteo, Michel Cannarsa and Cristina Poncibò. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592239.004
  9. Durovic, Mateja, Franciszek Lech, 1/2019. The Enforceability of Smart Contracts, Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava: 76, 92–93. https://doi.org/10.5937/RKSPP1901073D
  10. Đorđević, Milena. 2021. Pravila o ubrzanom arbititražnom postupku. 482–483 in Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom EU, edited by Vuk Radović. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  11. Đurović, Andrea. 3/2020. Pametni ugovori kao inovacija u pravu osiguranja, Pravo i privreda 58: 312. https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2003305C
  12. Ferrari, Franco, Friedrich Rosenfeld. 2023. Limitations to Party Autonomy in International Arbitration. 49–80 in Cambridge Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration, edited by Stefan Kröll, Andrea K. Bjorklund and Franco Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304467.004
  13. Greer, Joel. 2022. New Approaches to Arbitration Proposed for Smart Contracts, https://zelojapan.com/lawsquare/25968 (last visited 16 April 2023).
  14. Janssen, André. 2022. The United Nations on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and the Emergence of Smart Contracts and Cryptocurrencies: Should We Try to Teach an Old Dog Some New Tricks? Tsinghua China Law Review 14:S: 9–17.
  15. Jovanović, Marko. 4–6/2018. O nekim razlikama između trgovinske i investicione arbitraže. Pravo i privreda 56: 345–364.
  16. Jovanović, Stefan. 2/2021. Merodavno pravo za arbitrabilnost predmeta spora: lex fori, lex arbitri i njihove alternative. Pravo i privreda 59: 416–418. https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2102087J
  17. Jovanović, Stefan, David Vučinić. 3/2022. Dozvoljenost izjavljivanja revizije u postupku priznanja strane sudske odluke. Pravo i privreda 60: 535–552. https://doi.org/10.55836/PiP_22306A
  18. Kasatkina, Marina, 2/2022. Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Smart Contracts. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 16: 143–162. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2022-2-2
  19. Knežević, Gašo. 2/2006. Pravo i promene: ADR – promena u pravu, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 54:122–150.
  20. Knežević, Gašo, Vladimir Pavić. 2013. Arbitraža i ADR. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  21. Landbrecht, Johannes, Andreas R. Wehowsky. 2/2022. Arbitrating Blockchain and Smart Contract Disputes – Lessons to be Learnt from Commodities and Shipping Arbitration?. ASA Bulletin, 40: 309–331, edited by Matthias Scherer. Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.54648/ASAB2022028
  22. Law Commission. 2021. Smart Legal Contracts – Advice to Government, 25 November. https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/ (last visited 10 May 2023).
  23. Lesaege, Clément, Federico Ast, William George. 2019. Kleros Short Paper v1.0.7. Kleros. https://kleros.io/static/whitepaper_en-8bd3a0480b45c39899787e17049ded26.pdf (last visited 10 May 2023).
  24. Lefèvre, Françoise, Nicolas Delwaide. 2019. Resolving Smart Contracts’ Disputes Through Arbitration: Thoughts And Perspectives. 226. Liber Amicorum CEPANI (1969–2019): 50 Years of Solutions, edited by Dirk De Meulemeester and Maxime Berlingin. Kluwer Law International.
  25. Lutman Karmen. 2/2020. Neosnovano obogaćenje u odnosu na ugovorno, deliktno i stvarno pravo. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 68: 111–113. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB2002100L
  26. Michaelson, Peter L., Sandra A. Jeskie. 4/2019. Arbitrating Disputes Involving Blockchains, Smart Contracts, and Smart Legal Contracts. Dispute Resolution Journal 74: 89–133, edited by Gregory Kochansky. Kluwer Law International: AAA-ICDR. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3720876
  27. Pavić, Vladimir. 2021. Pravilnik Beogradskog arbitražnog centra o rešavanju berzanskih sporova na Produktnoj berzi iz Novog Sada. 371–375 in Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom EU, edited by Vuk Radović. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  28. Pavić, Vladimir, Milena Đorđević. 3/2021. Virtual Arbitration Hearings: The New Normal, Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 69: 547–576. https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21302A
  29. Pavic, Vladimir, Milena Đorđević. 2014. Novine u pravnom okviru za ADR u Srbiji. Harmonius Journal of Social and Legal Studies in South East Europe: 244–271.
  30. Pavic, Vladimir. 2010. National Reports: Serbia. World Arbitration Reporter, 2nd ed., edited by Loukas Mistelis, Laurence Shore, Hans Smit. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1729841 (last visited 16 April 2023).
  31. Paunović, Miroslav. 4–6/2018. Osnovne osobenosti investicionih arbitraža. Pravo i privreda 56: 173–189.
  32. Raskin, Max. 1/2017. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review 306: 321–329.
  33. Sklaroff, Jeremy M. 2017. Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 166: 263–302.
  34. Szabo, Nick. Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets, http://www.truevaluemetrics.org/DBpdfs/BlockChain/Nick-Szabo-Smart-Contracts-Building-Blocks-for-Digital-Markets-1996–14591.pdf (last visited 20 April 2023).
  35. Stanivuković, Maja. 2013. Međunarodna arbitraža. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik.
  36. Stanivuković, Maja. 2022. National Report for Serbia (2020 through 2022), 43–44 in ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, edited by Lise Bosman. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  37. Sharma, Chandrika. 4/2022. Blockchain Arbitral Award: Potential Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement under the New York Convention. Revista Română de Arbitraj 16: 85–107.
  38. Shehata, Ibrahim. 2018. Smart Contracts & International Arbitration. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3290026 (last visited 16 April 2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290026
  39. Scott, Kate, Sam Brown, Rita Flakoll, Diego Ballon Ossio. 2022. Arbitration for Cryptoasset and Smart Contract Disputes, Clifford Chance, London: 9.
  40. Scherer, Maxi, Dharshini Prasad, Dina Prokic. 2023. The Principle of Equal Treatment in International Arbitration. 1127–1152 in Cambridge Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration, edited by Stefan Kröll, Andrea K. Bjorklund, Franco Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304467.038
  41. Tapscott, Don, Alex Tapscott. 2016. The Impact of the Blockchain Goes Beyond Financial Services. Harvard Business Review, 10 May. https://hbr.org/2016/05/the-impact-of-the-blockchain-goes-beyond-financial-services (last visited 16 April 2023).
  42. Taylor, Edward, Jennifer Wu, Zach Li. 2022. Crypto Arbitration: A Survival Guide. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22 September. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/09/29/crypto-arbitration-a-survival-guide/ (last visited 16 April 2023).
  43. Uff, Alexander. 2021. Expedited arbitration, autonomy and due process (part two), Thomson Reuters, 13 September. http://arbitrationblog.practicallaw.com/expedited-arbitration-autonomy-and-due-process-part-two/ (last visited 10 May 2023).
  44. UNCITRAL, Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the “New York Convention”). https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2 (last visited 14 November 2023).
  45. Viruel Carrera, Mauricio. 2022. Accommodating Kleros as a Decentralised Dispute Resolution Tool for Civil Justice Systems: Theoretical Model and Case of Application. 16–18. https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmfNrgSVE9bb17KzEVFoGf4KKA1Ekaht7ioLjYzheZ6prE/Accommodating%20Kleros%20as%20a%20Decentralized%20Dispute%20Resolution%20Tool%20for%20Civil%20Justice%20Systems%20-%20Theoretical%20Model%20and%20Case%20of%20Application%20-%20Mauricio%20Virues%20-%20Kleros%20Fellowship%20of%20Justice.pdf (last visited 10 May 2023).
  46. Zaslowsky, David. 2018. What to Expect When Litigating Smart Contract Disputes, Law360, 4 April. https://www.law360.com/articles/1028009/what-to-expect-when-litigating-smart-contract-disputes (last visited 10 May 2023).
  47. Queen Mary University of London, White & Case. 2021. 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting arbitration to a changing world.
  48. Queen Mary University of London, White & Case. 2018. 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration.
  49. Werbach, Kevin. 2018. Trust, But Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33: 487–550.
  50. Wiegandt, Dirk. 5/2022. Blockchain, Smart Contracts and the Role of Arbitration. 671–690 in Journal of International Arbitration 39, edited by Maxi Scherer. Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2022029