Чланак
дец 31
Назад

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE RULE OF LAW

Rodoljub Etinski, Bojan Tubić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1603057E
САЖЕТАК /
The rule of law cannot achieve its main goal – the protection of individual freedom and well-being – without international law. The peculiar characteristics of international law and international legal order do not harm the rule of law. There is nothing inherent in international law that is an obstruction to the rule of law. International human rights law plays a particular role in strengthening the rule of law. The revolt of the European Court of Justice against the arbitrary interference of the UN Security Council in human rights has opened a new horizon for the rule of law in relationships between individuals and international organizations.
ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Abbott F. M., „The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health“, (AJIL) 2/2005, 317.
  • Anagnostou D., Mungiu-Pippidi A., “Domestic Implementation of Human Rights Judgments in Europe: Legal Infrastructure and Government Effectiveness Matter” EJIL 25/2014, 205.
  • Aust A., “Kadi: Ignoring International Legal Obligations”, International Organizations Law Review 6/2009.
  • Avramović D., “Vladavina prava – međunarodno priznata vrednost?“, Scientific Conference „The European Union of Nations and Universal Values“, held on 13 September 2008 in the organization of NATEF, available on http://natef.net/downloads/Dragutin%20Avramovic.pdf, 14 October 2016.
  • Benvenisty E., „Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders”, American Journal of International Law (AJIL) 107/2013, 295-333.
  • Bingham L., “The Rule of Law”, Cambridge Law Journal 1/2007, 84.
  • Brooks R. E., “Conceiving a Just World under Law: A Panel Summary of Remarks by Frederic L. Kirgis”, Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 2004, 126.
  • Cannizzaro E., “A Machiavellian Moment, The UN Security Council and the Rule of Law”, International Organizations Law Review 3/2006.
  • Chesterman S., Panel on “The 2012 UN Declaration on the Rule of Law and Its Projections”, American Society of International Law Proceedings 107/2013.
  • Crawford J., “International Law and The Rule of Law”, Adelaide Law Review 24/2003, 4.
  • D’Aspremont J., Dopagne F., “Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders”, International Organizations Law Review 5/2008.
  • De Búrca G, Nollkaemper A., Canor I., “The European Courts and the Security Council: Between Dédoublement Fonctionnel and Balancing of Values: Three Replies to Pasquale De Sena and Maria Chiara Vitucci,” in EJIL 20/2009.
  • De Búrca G., “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi”’, Jean Monnet Working Papers 1/2009, available at: www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/09/090101.html, 10 October 2016.
  • De Sena P., Vitucci M. Ch., “The European Courts and the Security Council: Between Dédoublement Fonctionnel and Balancing of Values”, EJIL 20/2009.
  • De Sena P., Vitucci M. Ch., “The European Courts and the Security Council: Between Dédoublement Fonctionnel and Balancing of Values: A Rejoinder to Gráinne de Búrca, André Nollkaemper and Iris Canor”, EJIL 20/2009.
  • Dicey A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis 1982., 120.
  • Etinski R., “Subsequent Practice in the Application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as a Means of its Interpretation”, Thematic Collection of Papers, Harmonisation of Serbian and Hungarian Law with the European Union Law, Novi Sad Faculty of Law 2015, 17-36.
  • Halberstam D., Stein E., “The United Nations, the European Union, and the King of Sweden: Economic Sanctions and Individual Rights in a Plural World Order”, Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/2009, available at http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/09/090201.pdf, 10 October 2016.
  • Henkin L., “The Age of Rights”, Human Rights (eds. L. Henkin, G. L. Neuman, D. F. Orentlicher, D. W. Leebron), University Casebook Series, New York 1999, 11.
  • Hull W. I., “Obligatory Arbitration and The Hague Conferences”, AJIL 2/1908, 731.
  • Jackson J. J., “International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?“ AJIL 98/2004, 109-123.
  • Lammash H., “Compulsory Arbitration at the Second Hague Conference”, AJIL 4/ 1910, 93.
  • Lamy P., “Place of the WTO and its Law in the International Legal Order”, EJIL 5/ 2007, 972.
  • Lukić M., “The Security Council’s Targeted Sanctions in the Light of Recent Developments Occurring in the EU Context”, Annals of the Faculty of law in Belgrade – Belgrade Law Review 3/2009.
  • Reinisch A., “Panel on the 2012 UN Declaration on the Rule of Law and Its Projections”, American Society of International Law Proceedings 107/2013, 469, 473.
  • Sándor-Szalay E., “Fundamental Rights at the Crossroads”, Conferinţa Internaţionalӑ Bienalӑ, Timișora 2008.
  • Shany Y, “Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal Based Approach”, AJIL 106/2012, 225-270.
  • Shany Y., “Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law”, EJIL, 5/2006,. 907-940.
  • Takis Tridimas P., Gutierrez-Fons J. A., “EU law, International Law and Economic Sanctions against Terrorism: The Judiciary in Distress?”, Fordham International Law Journal 32/2008-2009.
  • Tomaschut C., “Case T 306/01, Ahmed Ali Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission , judgment of the Court of the First Instance of 21 September 2005; Case T 315/01 Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council and Commission, judgment the Court of the First Instance of 21 September 2005, nyr”, Common Market Law Review 43/2006.
  • Vukadinović G., Avramović D., Uvod u pravo, Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad 2014, 107.
  • Waldron J., “Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law?”, The European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 2/2011, 316-343.
  • Whitford W. C., “The Rule of Law”, Wisconsin Law Review 3/2000, 724.
  • Ziegler K. S., “Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Review 2/2009.
  • Case C-469/93, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Chiquita Italia SpA., Judgment of 12 December 1995, para 26-29.
  • Case T-306/01, Ahmed Ali Yusuf, Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, Judgment of 21 September 2005, para. 277.
  • Case T-315/01, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v. Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, Judgment of 21 September 2005, para. 226.
  • Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v. Council of the European Union, Judgment of 3 September 2008, para. 287.
  • Case T-85/09, Kadi v. Commission, 30 September 2010, Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P, C-595/10 P, Judgment of 18 July 2013.
  • Christine Goodwin v The United Kingdom App. no. 28957/95 (ECtHR, 11 July 2002) para 74.
  • Chapman v the United Kingdom App. no. 27238/95 (ECtHR, 18 January 2001) para 93.
  • D.H. and Others v the Czech Republic, App. no. 57325/00 (ECtHR, 13 November 2007) para 181.
  • Sampanis et autres c Grèce App. no. 32526/05 (ECtHR, 5 June 2008) para 72.
  • Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the defence motion for interlocutary appeal on jurisdiction, adopted by the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia on 2 October 1995.
  • http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto.pdf, 21 September 2016.
  • http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sprr_e/sppr_14apr99_e.doc, 26 September 2016.
  • http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm, 1 October 2016.
  • https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=en, 1 October 2016.
  • https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-10&chapter=18&clang=en, 1 October 2016.
  • http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3, 1 October 2016.
  • http://www.un.org/press/en/2005/ik486.doc.htm, 1 October 2016.