Чланак
јун 19
Назад

A NEW CHAPTER IN ACCOUNTABILITY: TRANSPARENCY AND ANONYMISATION IN THE CROATIAN COURTS

Paula ŠAMANIĆ MATIJEVIĆ, Martina TIČIĆ

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_25204A
САЖЕТАК /

The ongoing digitalisation of judicial systems has intensified the debate over balancing the requirement of transparency and the right to privacy. In Croatia, recent legislative amendments mandate online publication of judgments, which marks a significant step toward ensuring transparency. However, this raises questions about reconciling public access to information with individual privacy protection. This article thus evaluates the implications of these changes, examining their compliance with privacy standards and their impact on judicial practices. It assesses whether current legal provisions adequately balance transparency and privacy, particularly by evaluating the existing anonymisation measures. By situating Croatia’s reforms within a comparative legal context, the study also highlights the challenges and opportunities in implementing the obligation of online publication of judgments. The findings aim to assess whether the current solution represents a balanced approach to achieving transparency in the judiciary while safeguarding privacy rights, and offer recommendations for potential improvements.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  1. Bobek, Michael. 2/2019. Data protection, Anonymity and Courts. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26: 183–189.
  2. Budak, Jelena, Bruno Škrinjarić. 1/2024. Corruption and Trust in Institutions in Croatia before and after the EU Membership. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 24: 147–182.
  3. Buijze, Anoeska. 3/2013. The Six Faces of Transparency. Utrecht Law Review 9: 3–25.
  4. Council of Europe. 2023. Publication of Judicial Decisions: The Council of Europe’s Points for Consideration. Fostering transparency of judicial decisions and enhancing the national implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. https://rm.coe.int/publication-of-judicial-decisions-the-council-of-europe-s-points-for-c/1680aeb36d, last visited March 5, 2025.
  5. European Commission. 2020. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  6. European Commission. 2023. Country reports – Digital Decade report 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/country-reports-digital-decade-report-2023, last visited March 5, 2025.
  7. Gruodyte, Edita, Saulė Milčiuviene. 2/2018. Anonymization of court decisions in the EU: Actual and comparative issues. Law Review 18: 60–70.
  8. Josipović, Tatjana. 2020. Privatno pravo Europske unije – Opći dio. Zagreb: Narodne novine.
  9. Koivisto, Ida. 2022. The Transparency Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. LoPucki, Lynn M. 2/2009. Court-System Transparency. Iowa Law Review 94: 481–538.
  11. Magrath, Paul. 3/2015. Judgments as Public Information. Legal Information Management 15: 189–195.
  12. Mehlman, Jeffrey. 1972. The ‘Floating Signifier’: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan. Yale French Studies. French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis 48: 10–37.
  13. Mišćenić, Emilia. 2024. Information, Transparency and Fairness for Consumers in the Digital Environment. 81–118 in Digital Vulnerability in European Private Law, edited by Camilla Crea and Alberto de Franceschi. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  14. Mišćenić, Emilia. 2024a. The Role of the Rule of Law in Croatian Private Law Relationships. 115–135 in The European Convention on Human Rights and Private Law Comparative Perspectives from South-Eastern Europe, edited by Mateja Đurović and Cristina Poncibo. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  15. Musa, Anamarija. 4/2017. Transparentno sudstvo u funkciji efikasne primjene prava i učinkovite uprave: objava upravnosudske prakse. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 17: 3–46.
  16. Novak, Nia, Marko Jurić. 2023. Anonimizacija sudskih odluka. 43–81 in Zbornik radova 11. savjetovanja Novosti u upravnom pravu i upravnosudskoj praksi, edited by Ante Galić. Zagreb: Visoki upravni sud Republike Hrvatske.
  17. Pađen, Ivan. 1/2022. Vladavina prava i tajnost pravosuđa. Godišnjak Akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske 13: 1–12.
  18. Pozen, David E. 2/2020. Seeing Transparency More Clearly. Public Administration Review 80: 326–331.
  19. Sciolla, Jacopo Ciani, Ludovica Paseri. 2023. Anonymisation of Judicial Rulings for Legal Analytics Purposes: Ethics, Law, and Compliance. 105–117 in Progress in Artificial Intelligence, edited by Nuno Moniz, Zita Vale, José Cascalho, Catarina Silva and Raquel Sebastião. Cham: Springer.
  20. Sivajothy, Subhanya. 1/2019. With and Against Transparency: Taking a Critical Look at How ‘Transparency’ is taken Up in Data Justice Discourses. The iJournal 5: 57–66.
  21. Terzidou, Kalliopi. 2023. Automated Anonymisation of Court Decisions: Facilitating the Publication of Court Decisions through Algorithmic Systems. 297–305 in ICAIL ‘23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  22. Tormen, Luca. 2022. Access to Judicial Records and Data Protection in Italian Law. Portolano Cavallo. https://portolano.it/en/newsletter/litigation-arbitration/making-judicial-records-public-personal-data-protection-italian-law, last visited March 5, 2025.
  23. Toth, Ivan. 2023. Pravo na privatnost. Ius-Info. https://www.iusinfo.hr/strucni-clanci/pravo-na-privatnost, last visited March 5, 2025.
  24. Transparency International, 2023. Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency.org, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023, last visited March 5, 2025.
  25. Uzelac, Alan. 1/2021. Accountability and Transparency in Civil Justice. Some General Remarks and a View from Croatia. Revija Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava 3: 121–145.
  26. Bijsterveld, Sophie van. 2004. Transparency in the European Union: A Crucial Link in Shaping the New Social Contract Between the Citizen and the EU. 17–30 in Transparency in Europe II: Public Access to Documents in the EU and its Member States, edited by Peter Stolk, Aida Tunović, Herke Kranenborg and Wim Voermans. The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations.
  27. Opijnen, Marc van. 2/2016. Court Decisions on the Internet: Development of a Legal Framework in Europe. Journal of Law, Information & Science 24: 26–48.
  28. Opijnen, Marc van, Ginevra Peruginelli, Eleni Kefali, Monica Palmirani. 2017. On-line Publication of Court Decisions in the EU Report of the Policy Group of the Project ‘Building on the European Case Law Identifier’. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3088495, last visited March 5, 2025.
  29. Schwab, Klaus (ed.). 2019. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf, last visited March 5, 2025.
  30. Zalnieriute, Monika. 1/2021. ‘Transparency Washing’ in the Digital Age: A Corporate Agenda of Procedural Fetishism. Critical Analysis of Law 8: 139–153.