Чланак
мар 26
Назад

ACQUISITION OF OWNERSHIP THROUGH ADVERSE POSSESSION OF SOCIALLY OWNED LAND

Katarina DOLOVIĆ BOJIĆ, Snežana DABIĆ NIKIĆEVIĆ

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_26105A
САЖЕТАК /

The removal of the provision prohibiting the possibility of acquiring ownership through usucapio of land in social ownership has created numerous dilemmas and made this legal institute topical. The courts have faced not only the challenge of determining how to assess the legality and conscientiousness of the possessor, but also the question whether the time that elapsed before the prohibition was lifted could be included in the time period for acquisition of ownership. Considering the significant number of court disputes, the authors believe that it is important to address this issue. Although it seems that the institute of usucapio is slowly fading into obscurity, because it contradicts the idea of properly maintained land registers, the fact is that courts still resort to its rules, since it sometimes remains a last resort in their attempts to transform certain factual situations into legal ones.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Ћирилици   Латиници   Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  1. Aranđelović, Svetislav. 1/1973. Normativna sadrzina i primena prava svojine. [Normative content and application of property rights]. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 21.
  2. Brežanski, Jasna. 1/2009. Još o stјecanјu vlasništva dosјelošću na nekretninama u društvenom vlasništvu [Further Writings on Acquiring the Ownership Over the Real Estates in Public Ownership by Means of Adverse Possession]. Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law of the University of Rijeka 30: 601–629.
  3. Vodinelić, Vladimir. 1981. Održaj – uporednopravno [Usucapio – comparative law perspective]. Master’s thesis. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  4. Vodinelić, Vladimir. 3–4/1979. Održaj – razmatranja povod Nacrta Zakona o pravu svojine i drugim stvarnim pravima na nepokretnostima [Usucapio – considerations regarding the Draft Law on Property Rights and Other Property Rights on Immovable Property]. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 27: 403–420.
  5. Gams, Andrija. 1974. Osnovi stvarnog prava [Fundamentals of property law]. Belgrade: Naučna knjiga.
  6. Dolović Bojić, Katarina. 1/2019. Održaj kao način sticanja prava svojine na nepokretnosti [Adverse Possession as a Way of Acquiring Ownership over Immovable Property]. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 67: 159–181.
  7. Dolović Bojić, Katarina, Snežana Dabić Nikićević. 12/2024. Institut održaja i savremene tendencije u našem pravu [Usucapio as a legal institute and its contemporary developments in Serbian law]. 32: 5–12 in Current and contested issues in labor, commercial, civil and procedural law, edited by Predrag Trifunović. Belgrade: Glosarijum.
  8. Živković, Miloš. 2024. Analiza sudske prakse u vezi sa zastarelošću zahteva za povraćaj datog po ništavom ugovoru [Analysis of Case Law Related to Limitation of Restitution Claims arising out of Nullity of Contract]. 125–148 in Civil Law in Motion – Transformation prior to Codification, edited by Marija Karanikić Mirić, Miloš Živković. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  9. Ilić-Popov, Gordana. 5–6/1991. Društvena svojina i njena pravna priroda [Social ownership and its legal nature]. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 39: 793–806.
  10. Jelić, Rajko. 2013. Javna svojina i srodni oblici [Public property and related forms]. Belgrade: Dosije.
  11. Kontrec, Damir. 1/2017. Stjecanje prava vlasništva dosjelošću na nekretninama u društvenom vlasništvu u svjetlu nove prakse Europskog suda za ljudska prava [Acquisition of Ownership Rights by Usucaption of Real Property in Social Ownership in the Light of the New Practice of the European Court of Human Rights], Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law of the University of Rijeka 38: 573–591.
  12. Krsmanović, Tomislav. 2001. Stvarno pravo i promet nepokretnosti – propisi sa sudskom praksom [Property law and transaction of immovables – regulations and case law]. Belgrade: Poslovni biro.
  13. Orlić, Miodrag. 1969. Lična svojina kao pravna kategorija: Socijalna sadržina prava svojine pojedinaca ili novi oblik prava svojine? [Personal ownership as a legal category: the social content of individual property rights or a new form of ownership]. Master’s thesis. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  14. Povlakić, Meliha. 2019. Dosjelost u novom stvarnom pravu u Bosni i Hercegovini – na zapadu nešto novo? [Usucapio in the new property law of Bosnia and Herzegovina – something new in the west?]. 285–308 in Liber amicorum Vladimir Vodinelić, edited by Miloš Živković. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  15. Popov, Danica. 1/2011. Kvalifikovana državina u funkciji sticanja prava svojine održajem [The Qualified Possession Turn into Ownership]. Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad 2011: 109–125.
  16. Ralčić, Tomislav. 1983. Pravni instituti, propisi i sudska praska u oblasti svojinskih odnosa, sa registrom pojmova [Legal institutes, regulations and case law in the field of property relations, with glossary]. Belgrade: Književne novine.
  17. Stanković, Obren. Miodrag Orlić. 1999. Stvarno pravo [Property law]. Belgrade: Nomos.
  18. Simonetti, Petar. 1/2008. Stjecanje prava vlasništva primjenom ustanova dosjelosti i uzurpacije na nekretninama koje su bile u društvenom vlasništvu [Acquiring the Right of Ownership Over the Real Estates Previously in Public Ownership by Means of Adverse Possession and Usurpation]. Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law of the University of Rijeka 29: 27–70.
  19. Stojanović, Dragoljub. Dmitar Pop-Georgiev. 1983. Komentar Zakona o osnovnim svojinsko-pravnim odnosima [Commentary of Law on Basic Property Relations]. Belgrade: Službeni list SFRJ.
  20. Stojanović, Dragoljub. 1980. Nesavladive prepreke: Član 383 [Insurmountable obstacles: Art. 383]. 932 in Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima [Commentary of the Law on Obligations], edited by Slobodan Perović, Dragoljub Stojanović. Gornji Milanovac: Kulturni centar.
  21. Studin, Josip. 1980. Nesavladive prepreke: Član 383 [Insurmountable obstacles: Art. 383]. 859 in Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima [Commentary of the Law on Obligations], edited by Borislav Blagojević, Vrleta Krulj. Belgrade: Savremena administracija.
  22. Trifunović, Predrag. 2/1999. Dopuštenost održaja na nepokretnosti i problem retroaktivnosti [The admissibility of usucapio on immovable property and the problem of retroactivity]. Bulletin of Judicial Practice of the Supreme Court of Serbia.
  23. Hiber, Dragor. 1998. Svojina u tranziciji [Ownership in transition]. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  24. Supreme Court of Serbia. 1986. Collection of Court Decisions in the Field of Civil Law 1973–1986. Belgrade: Supreme Court of Serbia.