Чланак
дец 31
Назад

RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND LEGAL RECOGNITION OF GENDER IDENTITY IN SERBIA – CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SERBIA AT WORK

Tatjana Papić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1603113P
САЖЕТАК /

This paper discusses different issues pertaining to a 2012 landmark decision of the Serbian Constitutional Court on the legal recognition of surgical gender reassignment. In this case, the SCC made a substantial contribution to the protection of human rights, in general, and an important contribution for the protection of the rights of transgender persons, in particular. The former was achieved by the interpretation that art. 23 of the Constitution on the right to dignity and free development of individuals included protection of the right to privacy and family life (which was omitted in the list of rights guaranteed by the Constitution), interpreting the scope of this right in accordance with ECtHR standards. The latter was done by analogous application of the existing Act on Public Registries to situations in which medical gender reassignment was conducted to enable the necessary changes be made in the birth register. By the virtue of this, the SCC took an active approach in filling a lacuna in the Serbian legal system.

This paper also strives to examine impact of the SCC decision on the protection of rights of transgender persons and the current normative setting in respect to this vulnerable group in Serbia. It shows that the decision of the SCC remains the only legal basis on which transgender persons who have undergone a gender reassignment operation in Serbia can rely upon. However, bearing in mind Serbia’s EU aspiration and the fact that the EU Commission has been continuously noting that Serbia lacks of regulation in this field one should expect improvements, since EU integration seem to be the most effective tool for legislative and policy changes in Serbia.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Beširević, V., „Governing without Judiciary: The politics of the Constitutional Court of Serbia“, International Journal of Constitutional Law 12/2014, 954.
  • Draškić, M., „Evolucija u jurisprudenciji Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u pogeldu transseksulanih osoba: Evolucija i u Srbiji“, Perspektiva implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije (knjiga 2), (ed. S. Lilić), Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd 2012, str. 57
  • Harris, D. et al., Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014
  • Helfer, L. R. and E. Voeten, „International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe“, International Organization 68/2014, (2014), 77.
  • Kartag-Odri, A., „On Legal Gaps and New Interpretative Techniques of the Court’s Decision-Making“, Courts, Interpretation, the Rule of Law (eds. M. Jovanović and K. E. Himma), Eleven International Publishing, The Hague 2014
  • Papić, T and V. Đerić, Uloga Ustavnog suda Srbije u procesu demokratske tranzicije, beogradski centar za ljudska prava, Beograd 2016.
  • Papić, T., „Political Aftermath of the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo“, The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion (eds. M. Woods–M. Milanović), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015, 259.
  • Pavlović, S., „Analiza pravnog položaja transrodnih i transseksulanih osoba u Srbiji“, Model zakona o priznavanju pravnih posledica prоmene pola i utvrđivanja transseksualizma: Prava trasn osoba – od nepostojanja do stvaranja zakonskog okvira (ed S. Gajin), Center for Advanced Legal Studies, 2012.
  • Simić, J., „Medicionskopravni aspekti transseksualnosti – U susret priznavanju pravih posledica promene pola“, Pravni zapisi 2/2012, 299.
  • Act on Constitutional Court, Official Gazette RS, Nos. 09/07, 99/11, 18/13 (decision of the CC), 40/15 and and 103/15.
  • Act on Ombudsperson, Official Gazette RS, No. 79/05 and 54/07.
  • Act on Personal Registries, Official Gazette RS, No. 20/09.
  • Act on Police, Official Gazette RS, No. 6/16.
  • Action Plan for the implementation of the Anti-Dicrimination Strategy, Official Gazette RS, No. 107/14.
  • Anti-Discrimination Strategy, Official Gazette RS, No. 107/14, аvaliable in English at https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016801e8db9, 19 September 2016.
  • Decision on constitutional complaint, Už-3238/2011, 8 March 2012, Official Gazette RS, No. 25/12.
  • Decision on constitutional complaint, Už-4111/2010, 28 January 2014.
  • Recommendations for Amending Regulations of Relevance to the Legal Status of Transgender Persons, http://www.ombudsman.rodnaravnopravnost.rs/images/stories/preporuke%20transpolne%20osobe.doc, 19 September 2016.
  • Rules of Procedure on concrete criteria for identifying discrimination in educational institutions, Official Gazette RS, No. 22/16.
  • European instruments, documents and case-law:
  • ECtHR, Christine Goodwin v. UK, App. No. 28957/95 (11 July 2002).
  • ECtHR, L. v. Lithuania, App. No. 27527/03 (11 September 2004).
  • European Commission, Serbia 2014 Progress Report, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20140108-serbia-progress-report_en.pdf, 21 June 2016.
  • European Commission, Serbia 2015 Progress Report, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_serbia.pdf, 21 June 2016.
  • European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Official Gazette SCG (International Agreements), No. 9/03.