Чланак
дец 31
Назад

DO TFEU PROVISIONS ON FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS APPLY TO PRIVATE PARTIES – EXPANDED VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL DIRECT EFFECT?

Vladimir Savković

10.5937/AnaliPFB1804084S
САЖЕТАК /

The paper aims to establish whether and to what extent the TFEU provisions on free movement of goods apply to legal relations established between two or more private parties. To that end, a stringent analysis of the case law related to this particular issue is provided, aimed at supporting the initial hypotheses that, notwithstanding sporadic but only implicit inclination in its judgments towards establishing the direct horizontal effect of the free movement of goods, the CJEU has constantly and resolutely abstained from recognizing the existence of such an effect – the same effect that it acknowledged decades ago, regarding the free movement of workers and freedom to provide services. Before this analysis, overview is provided of the status quo regarding the horizontal direct effect of the free movement of workers and services, which was needed not only for understanding the differences in the CJEU’s approach to various fundamental freedoms but also to outline the general framework in which the horizontal direct effect of fundamental freedoms currently exists, too. Finally, based on the case law analysis, the conclusion is offered that in terms of the recent developments in the field of free movement of goods the CJEU has opted for further expansion of the concept of vertical direct effect in order to both avoid establishing the horizontal direct effect of the freedom of movement of goods and safeguard the functioning of internal market against certain impediments generated by private parties.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Arnull, A., “The European Court and Judicial Objectivity: A Reply to Professor Hartley”, The Law Quarterly Review 112/1996.
  • Baranard, C., The Substantive Law of the EU. The Four Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
  • Barnard, C., “Viking and Laval: An Introduction”, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 10/2008.
  • Blauberger, M., Schmidt, S. K., “The European Court of Justice and its political impact”, West European Politics 40(4)/2017.
  • Chalmers, D., Davies, G., Monti, G., European Union Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
  • Cuyvers A., “Freedom of Establishment and the Freedom to Provide Services in the EU”, East African Community Law: Institutional, Substantive and Comparative EU Aspects (eds. E. Ugirashebuja et al.), Brill, Leiden – Boston 2017.
  • De Freitas, L. V., “The Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice”, Judicial Activism: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences (eds. L. P. Coutinho, M. La Torre, S. D. Smith), Springer International Publishing, Cham – Heidelberg 2015.
  • De Mol, M., “Kücükdeveci: Mangold Revisited – Horizontal Direct Effect of a General Principle of EU Law: Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) Judgment of 19 January 2010, Case C–555/07”, European Constitutional Law Review 6(2)/2010.
  • De Waele, H., “The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Integration Process: A Contemporary and Normative Assessment”, Hanse Law Review 6(1)/2010.
  • Gormley, L. W., “Private Parties and the Free Movement of Goods: Responsible, Irresponsible, or a Lack of Principles?” Fordham International Law Journal 38(4)/2015.
  • Hartkamp, A., “The Effect of the EC Treaty in Private Law: On Direct and Indirect Horizontal Effects of Primary Community Law”, European Review of Private Law 18(3)/2010.
  • Hartley, T. C., “The European Court, Judicial Objectivity and the Constitution of the European Union”, The Law Quarterly Review 112/1996.
  • Lohse, J. E., “Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors — towards an ‘Indirect Horizontal Effect’“, European Public Law 13(1)/2007.
  • Krenn, C., “A Missing Piece in the Horizontal Effect ‘Jigsaw’: Horizontal Direct Effect and the Free Movement of Goods”, Common Market Law Review 49(1)/2012.
  • Mayr, S., “Putting a Leash on the Court of Justice? Preconceptions in National Methodology v Effet Utile as a Meta-Rule”, European Journal of Legal Studies 5(2)/2012.
  • Muir, E., Dawson, M., De Witte, B., “Introduction: The European Court of Justice as a Political Actor”, Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (eds. M. Dawson, B. de Witte, E. Muir), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.
  • Rasmussen, M., “Revolutionizing European law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1)/2014.
  • Rasmussen, M., “How to enforce European law? A new history of the battle over the direct effect of Directives, 1958–1987”, European Law Journal 23/2017.
  • Robin-Oliver, S., “The Evolution of Direct Effect in the EU: Stocktaking, Problems, Projections”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(1)/2014.
  • Sadl, U., ”The Role of Effet Utile In Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence From the Citation Web of the Pre-accession Case Law of the Court Of Justice of the EU”, European Journal of Legal Studies 8(1)/2015.
  • Savković, V., “The Alleged Case of Golden Shares in Montenegro: A Candidate Country’s Experience as an Incentive for Including Acta Jure Gestionis within the Range of Restrictions on Free Movement of Capital”, Review of Central and East European Law 41(2)/2016.
  • Schepel, H., “Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law”, European Law Journal 18(2)/2012.
  • Schepel, H., “Freedom of Contract in Free Movement Law: Balancing Rights and Principles in European Public and Private Law”, European Review of Private Law 21(5/6)/2013.
  • Shapiro, M., “The European Court of Justice”, The Evolution of EU Law (eds. P. Craig, G. De Búrca), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  • Storey, T., Turner, C., Unlocking Company Law, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon – New York 20144.
  • Stuyck, J., “The European Court of Justice as a motor of private law”, European Private Law (ed. C. Twigg-Flesner), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010.
  • Tridimas, T., “The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism”, European Law Review 21/1996.
  • Usher, J. A., “The Evolution of the Free Movement of Capital”, Fordham International Law Journal 31(5)/2007.
  • Van Harten, H., Nauta, T., “Towards Horizontal Direct Effect for the Free Movement of Goods? Comment on Fra.Bo”, European Law Review 38(5)/2013.
  • Van de Kooij, A. C., “The Private Effect of the Free Movement of Goods: Examining Private-Law Bodies’ Activities under the Scope of Article 34 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union”, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 40(4)/2013.
  • Van Leuken, R., Private Law and the Internal Market. Direct Horizontal Effect of the Treaty Provisions on Free Movement, Intersentia, Cambridge 2017.
  • Vuletić, D., “Direct Horizontal Effect of the Free Movement of Goods and Reshaping of the European Economic Constitution. Back to the Future?”, InterEULawEast 1(2)/2014.
  • Waytt, D., “Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Freedoms and the Right to Equality after Viking and Mangold, and the Implications for Community Competence”, Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy 4/2008.
  • Weiler, J. H. H., “The Court of Justice On Trial”, Common Market Law Review 24/1987.
  • Weiss, F., Kaupa, C., European Union Internal Market Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
  • Wiberg, M., The EU Services Directive: Law or Simply Policy?, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2014.