Чланак
сеп 30
Назад

MODIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND TRANSFER OF SUBJECTIVE RIGHTS

Miloš Živković, Marko Milenković, Sofija Nikolić Popadić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1903131Z
САЖЕТАК /

Amending construction permits is important for regulation of construction. Serbia had an inflexible system that did not allow it, due to lack of transferability of the underlying rights and state monopoly over construction land. Enabling ownership of construction land made it necessary to allow the transfer of construction permits. This was done while maintaining the system of issuing construction permits to developers and focusing on digitalization. This made the rights from administrative decisions transferable, which should not be the case. The root of confusion is a lack of distinction between public and private law aspects of construction. Comparatively, coupling construction permit with a developer is traditional in the former Yugoslav countries. In countries that did not have a socialist period, public and private law aspects of construction are distinguished and construction permit is coupled with the land. This solution is an indication for future development of construction law in Serbia.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Begović, Boris, Boško Mijatović, Dragor Hiber. 2006. Privatizacija državnog zemljišta u Srbiji. CLDS. http://www.clds.rs/newsite/privatizacija_dr_zemljista.pd, last visited 14 May 2019.
  • Brenner, Michael. 2009. Öffentliches Baurecht, 3. ed. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.
  • Wickel, Martin, Steven R. Schell, Dušan Nikolić. 2014. Pribavljanje građevinskih dozvola u Nemačkoj, SAD i Srbiji. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 1: 35–62.
  • Vodinelić, Vladimir. 2014. Građansko pravo, Uvod u građansko pravo i Opšti deo građanskog prava. Belgrade: PFUU – Službeni glasnik.
  • Vučetić, Dejan, Predrag Dimitrijević. 2013. Specifičnosti postupka izdavanja građevinske dozvole. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 65:325–343.
  • Gavella, Nikola, Tatjana Josipović, Igor Gliha, Vlado Belaj, Zlatan Stipković. 2007. Stvarno pravo, Svezak 1. Zagreb: Narodne novine.
  • Živković, Miloš, Marko Milenković. 2012. Značaj procene uticaja za urbanističko planiranje. 184–210 in Ekologija i pravo, edited by Aleksandra Čavoški, Ana Knežević-Bajović. Belgrade: Institut za uporedno pravo – PFUU.
  • Živković, Miloš. 2014. Tranzicija i propisi u izgradnji. 230–254 in Pravna sigurnost u uslovima tranzicije – Zbornik radova s naučnog skupa – Prilozi projektu 2013 “Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija s pravom EU”, edited by Radmila Vasić, Ivana Krstić. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  • Jovanović, Tatjana, Aleksandar Aristovnik, Tereza Rogić Lugarić. 2016. A comparative analysis of building permits procedures in Slovenia and Croatia: Development of a simplification model. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management 2:5–23.
  • Kirchmayer, Wolfgang. 2014. Wiener Baurecht, Kommentar 4th ed. Vienna: Verlag Österreich.
  • Nikolić, Sofija. 2016a. Legalizacija bespravno izgrađenih objekata u Srbiji. Pravni život 10:517–532.
  • Nikolić, Sofija. 2016b. Pretvaranje (konverzija) prava korišćenja u pravo svojine na građevinskom zemljištu u Srbiji. Nova pravna revija 1:40–50.
  • Pljakić, Ljubodrag. 2011. Građenje i legalizacija – Izmene i dopune Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji. Izbor sudske prakse 10:5–8.
  • USAID Business Enabling Program. 2012. Analiza efikasnosti postupka izdavanja građevinskih dozvola u Republici Srbiji. Cardno Emerging Markets USA, Ltd. MP & Associates. http://www.bep.rs/baza_znanja/documents/construction-permits/Analiza%20efikasnosti%20postupka%20izdavanja%20gradjevinskih%20dozvola%20FINAL%20SRP.pdf, last visited 9 May 2019.
  • Hiber, Dragor, Miloš Živković. 2015. Obezbeđenje i učvršćenje potraživanja. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law.
  • Čukić, Dragana, Dušan Vasiljević. 2018. Vodič kroz dozvole za izgradnju: Od ideje do upotrebe objekta. http://gradjevinskedozvole.rs/Files/00631/Vodic-kroz-dozvole-za-izgradnju.pdf, last visited 9 May 2019.