Vesna Knežević Predić, Zoran Radivojević
10.5937/AnaliPFB1803108K
The limits of EU competencies are determined by the principle of conferral, which is a fundamental principle of the law of international organizations. According to this principle, the Union has no general and unlimited competence, but disposes only of the powers entrusted to it by the Member States according to the founding treaty. Although it has never been disputed and challenged, this principle entered the founding treaties of the former European Communities and the current EU at a very slow pace and with considerable difficulty. In the initial stage of European integration, the treaty framers did not consider it necessary to incorporate the principles on the delimitation of competencies between the EC and the Member States, i.e. the principle of vertical division of power. As the basic principle for determining the limits of competencies of these organizations, the principle of conferral was for the first time explicitly mentioned in the Treaty establishing the EU. Thus, it became the basic principle of communitarian law, but not of the entire EU law. The constitutionalization of the principle of conferral ensued within the reform implemented by the Lisbon Treaty, when it has become a constitutional principle of the entire EU.
After reviewing the provisions explicitly referring to or elaborating on this principle, the authors focus on the concept of implied powers and the flexibility clause, which have been modelled in the post-Lisbon era. The former, taken from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, has enabled the EU to exercise competencies other than those it had been explicitly entrusted, which may stem from correlating the founding treaty to a legally relevant fact, such as the objective and effet utile of its provisions. The latter, however, implies a residual power that can be used in the absence of a specific legal basis when there is an agreement between the Member States and the EU institutions on the need for action in order to achieve one of the goals stipulated by the founding treaties. The authors’ discussion on the limits of EU competencies is followed up by exploring the types of powers, based on the classification adopted in the Lisbon Treaty. This typology, which relies on the previous practice of the EU, distinguishes exclusive and non-exclusive powers. The second category includes shared, complementary and coordinating powers.
- Bermann, G. A., „Competences of the Union“, European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century (eds. T. Tridimas, P. Nebbia), Hart Publishing, Oxford 2004.
- Blumann, C., Dubouis, L., Droit institutionnel de lʹUnion européenne, Litec LexisNexsis, Paris 2010.
- Chalmers, D., Tomkins, A., European Union Public Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.
- Crage, P., Burca, G., European Union law: Texts, Cases and Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
- Engstrom, V., „How to Tame the Elusive: Lessons from the Revision of the European Union Flexibility Clause“, International Organizations Law Review 2/2010.
- Geiger, R., Khan, D. E., Kotzur, M., European Union Treaties – a Commentary, C. H. Beck-Hart, Oxford 2015.
- Hartley, T. C., The Foundations of European Union Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
- Isaac, G., Blanquet, M., Droit général de lʼUnion européenne, Sirey, Paris 2012.
- Jacqué, J. P., Droit institutionnel de lʼUnion européenne, Dalloz, Paris 2012.
- Knežević-Predić, V., Radivojević, Z., Kako nastaje i deluje pravo Evropske unije, Službeni glasnik, Beograd 2009. (Knežević-Predić, V., Radivojević, Z., Kako nastaje i deluje pravo Evropske unije, Službeni glasnik, Beograd 2009)
- Knežević-Predić, V., Radivojević, Z., „Ugovorna sposobnost Evropske unije: šest decenija posle“, Srpska politička misao 1/2018. (Knežević-Predić, V., Radivojević, Z., „Ugovorna sposobnost Evropske unije: šest decenija posle“, Srpska politička misao 1/2018)
- Konstadinides, T., „Drawing the line between Circumvention and Gap-Filling: An Exploration of the Conceptual Limits of the Treatyʼs Flexibility Clause“, Yearbook of European Law 2012.
- Košutić, B., Rakić, B., Milisavljević, B., Uvod u pravo evropskih integracija, Pravni fakultet, Beograd 2013. (Košutić, B., Rakić, B., Milisavljević, B., Uvod u pravo evropskih integracija, Pravni fakultet, Beograd 2013)
- Lenaerts, K. et al., European Union Law, Sweet & Maxwell, London 2011.
- Meškić, Z., Samardžić, D., Pravo Evropske unije I, TDP – GIZ, Sarajevo 2012.
- Misita, N., Osnovi prava Evropske unije, Pravni fakultet, Sarajevo 2007.
- Piris, J. C., The Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
- Radivojević, Z., „O implicitnoj ugovornoj sposobnosti međunarodnih organizacija“, Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu 1989. (Radivojević, Z., „O implicitnoj ugovornoj sposobnosti međunarodnih organizacija“, Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu 1989)
- Radivojević, Z., Ugovori međunarodnih organizacija u međunarodnom javnom pravu, SKC, Niš 1996. (Radivojević, Z., Ugovori međunarodnih organizacija u međunarodnom javnom pravu, SKC, Niš 1996)
- Radivojević, Z., Knežević Predić, V., Institucije Evropske unije, Sven, Niš 2008. (Radivojević, Z., Knežević Predić, V., Institucije Evropske unije, Sven, Niš 2008)
- Rossi, L. S., „Does the Lisbon Treaty Provide a Clearer Separation of Competences between EU and Member States?“, EU Law after Lisbon (eds. A. Biondi, P. Eechout, S. Ripley), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
- Sauron, J. L., Comprendre le Traité de Lisbonne. Texte consolidé intégrale des traités, explications et commentaires, Gualino Editeur, Paris 2007.
- Schutze, R., „Organizad Change Towards an ‘Ever Closer Union’: Article 308 and the Limits to the Community Competences“, Yearbook of European Law 2003.
- Schutze, R., „The European Community’s Federal Order of Competence: A Retrospective Analysis“, 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward (eds. M. Dougan, S. Currie), Hart Publishing, Portland 2009.
- Schutze, R., „EU Competences Existence and Exercise“, The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (eds. A. Arnull, D. Chalmers), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
- Shermers, H. G., Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law – Unity within diversity, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston – Leiden 2003.
- Show, M., International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
Comments are closed.