Article
Jun 30
Back

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND INTERCOMPANY DISPUTES

Mirko Vasiljević

10.51204/Anali_PFUB_18201A
ABSTRACT /

The affirmation of resolution through arbitration of commercial disputes in the field of contract law, both at national levels (as an undisputable trend of varying degrees) as well as at the international level, has raised the issue of the possibility of resolving intercompany disputes in this manner, in order to extend the freedom of will of investors from the domain of establishing companies to include the domain of the freedom of choice of a forum for resolving possible disputes arising from numerous legal relations of this kind. However, unlike contracts, with the primacy of free will compared to limitations (the relation of rules and exceptions), the sphere of intercompany relations, although basically contractual by its origin, has, in its functioning, an emphasized need to resolve the conflict of contract and company law in order to make the arbitrability of these disputes realistically possible, while on the other hand, compared to the contract law, the sphere of company law is always more in the focus of attention of national public orders, as a universal institute (regardless of its scope), which represents an obstacle to arbitrability of these disputes.

In this paper, the author first analyses the legal nature of the constituent acts of companies (the founding act and statute of a joint stock company) in the context of an arbitration agreement, on which the arbitrability of intercompany disputes can solely be based, finding that their contractual nature is a serious obstacle to mandatory arbitrations of these disputes (if these acts with this clause are adopted by majority of votes), and that the theory of adhesion contracts could be a solution to encourage arbitrability, but only for closed type of companies, while this would not be possible in the case of a public joint stock company, especially in the case of non-professional shareholders because of the need to additionally protect them through consumer law. The author continues by analysing the notion of intercompany disputes and systems of possible objective arbitrability (ratione materiae) of these disputes, finding that the Serbian arbitration law and company law, especially with regard to the possible restrictive concept of „exclusive jurisdiction of commercial courts“ for these disputes, has at least serious reasons for changes in favour of strengthening their arbitrability, with certain necessary individual exclusions in case of the dominance of public order interest. Finally, the author also analyses certain aspects of multiparty nature of the intercompany disputes, especially regarding public joint stock companies, as possible procedural obstacles to their resolution through arbitration, even in cases of their possibly undisputable objective arbitrability.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)  
REFERENCES /
  • Abraham, K. S., Montgomery, J. W., „The Lawlessness of Arbitration“, 2012, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=353340, 25. mart 2018.
  • Alderman, R. M., „Consumer Arbitration: The Destruction of the Common Law“, The Journal of American Arbitration 2(1)/2003.
  • Allen, C. H., „Bylaws Mandating Arbitration of Stockholders Disputes?“, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 39(3)/2014.
  • Anglani, A., Liguori, F., „Italy’s New arbitration Laws“, The European Arbitration Review 2007.
  • Antić, O., Obligaciono pravo, Beograd 2007.
  • Armour, J. et al., „Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States“, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6(4)/2009.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01157.x
  • Babović, B., „O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog prava u prava država članica EU“, Pravo i privreda 4–6/17.
  • Ben-Shahar, O., „The Paradox of Access Justice and its Application to Mandatory Arbitration“, The University of Chicago Law Review 83(4)/2016.
  • Berger, M., „Arbitration and Arbitrability: Toward an Expectation Model“, Baylor Law Review 56(3)/2004.
  • Bernandini, P., „National Report for Italy, Arbitration in Company Matters“, Supplement No. 48, ICCA Interna-tional Handbook on Commercial Arbitration (eds. J. Paulsson, L. Bosman), Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2007.
  • Born, G. B., International Commercial Arbitration, Volume 1, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Borris, Ch., „Collective Arbitration: The European Experience – Germany and the DIS Supplementary Rules of Corporate Law Disputes“, Class and Civil Group Actions in Arbitration (eds. B. Hanotiau, E. A. Schwartz), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2016.
  • Brabant, T. A., Desplats, M., Salem, S., „Arbitration and Company Law in France“, European Company Law 12(3)/2015.
  • Brekoulakis, S. L., „On Arbitrability: Persisting Misconceptions and New Areas of Concern“, Arbitrability – Inter-national and Comparative Perspectives (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Carter, J., Payton, S., „Arbitration and Company Law in England and Wales“, European Company Law 12(3)/2015.
  • Choi, A. H., Min, G., „Amending Corporate Charters and Bylaws“, 2017, http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1898/, 25. mart
  • Coffee, J. C., „The Death of Stockholder Litigation?“, The National Law Journal, 13 February 2012.
  • Cohen, D., Arbitrage et société, LGDJ, Paris 1993.
  • Costa Braga de Oliveira, P. A., „Non-Signatories to the Arbitration Agreement: Recent Developments in Brazil“, 2007,
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1673008
  • Cozian, M., Viandier, A., Deboissy, F., Droit des sociétés, Paris 2006.
  • Cukavac, M., „Sadržina arbitražnog ugovora“, Arbitraža 2001. (Cukavac, M., „Sadržina arbitražnog ugovora“, Ar-bitraža 2001)
  • Cukavac, M., „Arbitraža i treća lica“, Arbitraža 2003.
  • Daujotas, R., „Non-signatories and Abuse of Corporate Structure in International Commercial Arbitration“, 2012,
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2148900
  • Dent, G. W., „The Power of Directors to Terminate Stockholder Litigation: The Death of the Derivative Suit?“, Northwestern University Law Review 75(1)/1980.
  • Deskoski, T., International Arbitration Law, Skopje 2016.
  • Dika, M., „Arbitrabilnost i isključiva nadležnost sudova“, Pravo u gospodarstvu 38(1)/1999.
  • Di Pietro, D., „General Remarks on Arbitrability under the New York Convention“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Đorđević, M., Jovanović, M., „Access to Arbitration by Economically Weaker Parties“, Croatian Arbitration Yearbook 24/2017.
  • Easterbrook, F., Fischel, D., „The Corporate Contract“, Foundations of Corporate Law (ed. R. Romano), New York 2012.
  • Esin, I. et al., „Arbitrating M&A Disputes“, Arbitration in Turkey (eds. I. Esin, A. Yesilimark), Kluwer Law Inter-national, Alphen aan den Rijn 2015.
  • Fouchard, Ph., Gaillard, E., Goldman, B., Traité de l’arbitrage commercial international, Paris 1996.
  • Galič, A., „Establishing an Out-of-Court Mechanism for the Resolution of Consumer Disputes“, Croatian Arbitra-tion Yearbook 24/2017.
  • Goldštajn, A., Triva, S., Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Zagreb 1987.
  • Gowling WLG, „Coming to Canada: Corporate Disputes and Litigation-Related Bylaws“, 2016, https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-re sources/articles/2016/corporate-disputes-and-litigation-bylaws-canada, 25. mart 2018.
  • Gross, J. I., „The End of Mandatory Securities Arbitration?“, Pace Law Review 4/2010.
  • Gross, J., „The Historical Basis of Securities Arbitration as an Investor Protection Mechanism“, Journal of Dispute Resolution 1/2016.
  • Guyon, Y., Droit des affaires, Paris 2003.
  • Hamel, J., Lagarde, G., Jauffret, A., Droit commercial, Paris 1980.
  • Jakšić, A., Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Beograd 2003.
  • Klein, P., „The Arbitration Agreement – Arbitrability of Company Law Disputes“, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2017 (eds. G. Zeiler et al.), Wien 2017.
  • Knežević, G., Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Beograd 1999.
  • Knežević, G., Pavić, V., Arbitraža i ADR, Beograd 2009.
  • Kondo, M. et al., Arbitration Law of Japan, Tokyo 2004.
  • Kraayvanger, J., Hilgard, M. C., „Arbitrability of Shareholders’ Disputes under German Law“, International Litigation Quarterly 26(1)/2009.
  • Le Cannu, P., Dondero, B., Droit des sociétés, Paris 2012.
  • Lee, J., „Intra-Corporate Dispute Arbitration and Minority Shareholder Protection: A Corporate Governance Perspective“, 2015, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2736981, 25. mart 2018.
  • Lipton, A. M., „Manufactured Consent: The Problem of Arbitration Clauses in Corporate Charters and Bylaws“, The Georgetown Law Journal 104(3)/2016.
  • Markert, L., „Arbitrating Corporate Disputes – German approaches and International solutions to Reconcile Conflicting Principles“, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 8(1)/2015.
  • McLaughlin, J. T., „Arbitrability: Current Trends in the United States“, Arbitration International, The Journal of the London Court of International Arbitration 2/1996.
  • Merle, Ph., Fauchon, A., Droit commercial – sociétés commerciales, Paris 2018.
  • Mistelis, L. A., „Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Morrisey, D. J., „Will Arbitration End Securities Litigation“, 2012, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2048707, 25. mart 2018.
  • Oberhammer, E., Weber, S., „The Arbitration Agreement and the Arbitrability: The Arbitration of Corporate Disputes in Limited Liability Companies“, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2010 (eds. Ch. Klausegger et al.), Wien 2010.
  • Ozel, O. E., „The Group of Companies Doctrine as a Non-Signatory Issue in Arbitration Agreements“, 2016, http://ozel.law/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ozel_articles-002.pdf, 25. mart 2018.
  • Palačković, D., „Množina procesnopravnih odnosa u arbitražnom postupku“, Arbitraža 2003.
  • Pamboukis, Ch., „On Arbitrability: The Arbitrator as a Problem Solver“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Paulsson, J., „Arbitrability Without Privacy“, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 10(2)/1995.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/10.2.232
  • Paulsson, J. et al., „Arbitrability special issue“, Arbitration International, The Journal of the London Court of International Arbitration 2/1996.
  • Perales Viscasillas, M. P., „Some Specific Issues About Arbitrability in Spain: Back to the Past“, Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade – Belgrade Law Review 4/2017.
    https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1704028V
  • Perović, J., Ugovor o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži, Beograd 1998.
  • Perović, S., Obligaciono pravo, Beograd 1980.
  • Petrović Tomić, N., „Rešavanje potrošačkih sporova pred arbitražom“, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 2/2014.
  • Pitkowitz, N., „The Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability, The Arbitrability of Corporate Disputes under Austrian Law – Still Open Questions?“, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2014 (eds. Ch. Klausegger et al.), Wien 2014.
  • Radović, M., „Pojam ugovora u ime budućeg društva“, Pravo i privreda 4–6/2014.
  • Raeschke-Kessler, H. R., „Arbitrability of Disputes Concerning Re­solutions of a Limited Liability Company (GmBH)“, Association Suisse de l’ arbitrage Bulletin 14(3)/1996.
  • Redffern, A., Hunter, M., International Commercial Arbitration, London 1992.
  • Schwartz, D. S., „If You Love Arbitration, Set it Free: How ‘Mandatory’ Undermines Arbitration“, Nevada Law Journal 8(1)/2008.
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1006826
  • Shell, G. R., „Arbitration and Corporate Governance“, North Carolina Law Review 67(3)/1989.
  • Shmatenko, L., „Piercing the Corporate Veil is Relative“, Young Arbi­tration Review 4(1)/2012.
  • Shore, L., „The United States’ Perspective on ‘Arbitrability’“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.
  • Stanivuković, M., Međunarodna arbitraža, Beograd 2013.
  • Stipanowitch, Th. J., „Arbitration and Multi-Party Dispute: The Search for Workable Solutions“, Iowa Law Review 72(3)/87.
  • Strong, S. I., „Enforcing Class Arbitration in the International Sphere: Due Process and Public Policy Concerns“, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 30(1)/2008.
  • Strong, S. I., Class, Mass and Collective Arbitration in National and International Law, 2013, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/class-mass-and-collective-arbitration-in-national-and-international-law-9780199772520?cc=rs〈=en&, 25. mart 2018.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199772520.001.0001
  • Ten Cate, I. M., „Multy-Party and Multy-Contract Arbitrations: Procedural Mechanisms and Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements under US Law“, The American Review of International Arbitration 15/2004.
  • Trajković, M., Međunarodno arbitražno pravo, Beograd 2000.
  • Uzelac, A., „Nove granice arbitrabilnosti u hrvatskom pravu“, Pravo u gospodarstvu 41(2)/2002.
  • Varady, T. et al., International Commercial Arbitration – A Transnational Perspective, St. Paul, Minn 1999.
  • Varadi, T., „What is Pro-Arbitration Today“, Croation Arbitration Year­book 21–22/2014–2015.
  • Vasiljević, M., Kompanijsko pravo, Beograd 2017.
  • Vasiljević, M., „Arbitrability ratione materiae in company law“, Pravni život 11/2017.
  • Ware, S. J., „Default Rules from Mandatory Rules: Privatizing Law Through Arbitration“, Minnesota Law Review 83(3)/1999.
  • Ware, S. J., „The Case of Enforcing Adhesive Arbitration Agreements – with Particular Consideration of Class Actions and Arbitration Fees“, The Journal of American Arbitration 5(2)/2006.
  • Ware, S. J., „What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?“, University of Cincinnati Law Review 76/2008.
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.140738
  • Winship, V., „Shareholder Litigation by Contract“, Boston University Law Review 96(2)/2016.
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2575668
  • Woolhouse, S. P., „Group of Companies Doctrine and English Arbitration Law“, Arbitration International 20(4)/2004.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/20.4.435
  • Youssef, K. A., „The Death of Inarbitrability“, Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspective (eds. L. A. Mistelis, S. L. Brekoulakis), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.