Чланак
сеп 30
Назад

ACCESS TO WATER IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSE: A THEORY OF THE COMMUNITY OF INTEREST

Mihajlo Vučić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1903077V
САЖЕТАК /

Securing free and equal access to water for individuals is foremost an objective of international water law. This article analyses the community of interest theoretical framework for the creation and implementation of rules that can achieve this objective. This theory is in line with the natural unity of the watercourse that traverses political borders between states. However, legal doctrine is not unanimous concerning its practical value, state practices largely evade it, and case law only provides declarative support without indicating precise contents of community rights and obligations. It seems that practical application of the community of interest theory is only possible through meticulous and systematic application of positive legal rules based on limited territorial sovereignty theory, in the spirit of joint management and use of common water resources.

ЧЛАНАК ЈЕ РАСПОЛОЖИВ НА /
Енглеском  
РЕФЕРЕНЦЕ /
  • Adar, Korwa G., Nicasius A. Check. 2011. Comparative Diplomacy, Regional Stability and National Interest: The Nile River and the Riparian States. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.
  • Berber, Fritz. 1955. Die Rechtsquellen des internationalen Wassernutzungsrechts. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.
  • Blutman, László. 2010. In the Trap of a Legal Metaphor. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59(3): 605–624.
  • Brunnée, Jutta, Stephen J. Toope, 1994. Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: A Case for International Ecosystem Law. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 5: 41–76.
  • Caflisch, Lucius. 1989. Règles générales du droit des cours d’eau internationaux, The Hague: Recueil des Cours.
  • Carathéodory, Etienne. 2010. Du Droit International Concernant les Grands Cours D’Eau (1861). Kessinger Publishing, LLC.
  • Dombrowsky, Ines. 2007. Conflict, Cooperation and Institutions in International Water Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Dunoff, Jeffrey L., Steven R. Rather, David Wipmann. 2015. International Law: Norms, Actors, Processes. Wolter Kluver.
  • Firuz, Paul A. 2012. Looking forward: The Columbia River treaty. Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 2(1): 170–192.
  • Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Olufemi Elias, 2004. Watercourse Co-operation in Northern Europe – A Model for the Future. The Hague: Asser Press.
  • Godana, Bonaya Adhi. 1985. Africa’s Shared Water Resources: legal and institutional aspects of the Nile, Niger and Senegal river systems. London: Frances Pinter.
  • Huber, Max. 1907. Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Gebietshoheit an Grenzflüssen, Zeitschriftfiir Välkerrecht und Bundesstaarsrecllt 1: 12–25.
  • International Law Commission. 1994. Draft articles on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses and commentaries thereto and resolution on transboundary confined groundwater, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1994, Vol. II, Part Two.
  • Rodgers, William H. 1991. Environmental Law. West Publishing Company.
  • Salman, Salman M. A., Siobhán McInerney-Lankford. 2004. The Human Right to Water. Legal and Policy Dimensions. World Bank, Law, Justice and Development Series. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gleick, Peter H., 1993. An Introduction to Global Fresh Water Issues. 3–12 in Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Freshwater Resources, edited by Peter H. Gleick. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Grotius, Hugo. 2001. The Rights of War and Peace. Adegi Graphics LLC.
  • Benvenisti, Eyal. 1996. Collective Action in the Utilization of Shared Freshwater: The Challenges of International Water Resources Law. American Journal of International Law 90(3): 384–415.
  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2015. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.
  • Hunter, David, James Salzman, Durwood Zaelke. 2002. International Environmental Law and Policy. Brill: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Kauffman, Gerald J. 2015. Governance, Policy, and Economics of Intergovernmental River Basin Management. Water Resources Management 29(15): 5689–5712.
  • Lederle, Gustav. 1927. Die Donauversinkung. Annalen des Deutschen Reichs 1927: 693–717.
  • Le Fur, Louis, Chklaver Georges. 1934. Recueil de textes de Droit international public. Dalloz: Paris.
  • Lipper, Jerome. 1967. Equitable Utilization. 39–63. The Law of International Drainage Basins, ed. Albert Garretson, Robert Hayton, Cecil Olmstead. New York: New York University Law School.
  • McCaffrey, Stephen. 1996. The Harmon Doctrine One Hundred Years Later: Buried, Not Praised. Natural Resources Journal 36: 549–590.
  • McCaffrey, Stephen, Robert Rosenstock. 1996. The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on International Watercourses: an Overview and Commentary. Review of the European Community and International Environmental Law 5(2): 89–96.
  • McCaffrey, Stephen. 2010. The Law of International Watercourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McIntyre, Owen. 2004. The Emergence of an ‘Ecosystem Approach’ to the Protection of International Watercourses under International Law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 13: 1–14.
  • Rahaman, Muhammad Mizanur. 3/2009. Principles of international water law: creating effective transboundary water resources management. International Journal of Sustainable Society 1: 207–223.
  • Rocha Loures, Flavia. 2016. The Dragon as Part of Transboundary Basin ‘Villages’: Community of Interests and International Law in China. Water Law 24: 220–238.
  • Samvel, Gor. 2018. Seemingly Connected, Obviously Separate: The Parallel Realities of the UN Global Compact and the Multilateral Regimes in Water Governance. Laws 37: 1–14.
  • Schlettwein, Johann A, 1785. Die Gerechtigkeit und das allgemeine europäische Staatsinteresse bey dem Streite über die Oeffnung der Schelde und des Ostindischen Handels für die Oesterreichischen Niederlande. Gießen: Krieger.
  • Schmeier, Susanne. 2015. Governing International Watercourses: River Basin Organizations and the Sustainable Governance of Internationally Shared Rivers and Lakes. London: Routledge.
  • Szwedo, Piotr. 2018. Cross-border Water Trade: Legal and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Brill: Nijhoff.
  • Teclaff, Ludwik A., 1991. Fiat or Custom: The Checkered Development of International Water Law. Natural Resources Journal 31: 355–370.
  • Tza, Alejandro. 2004. Developments under Ramsar Convention: Allocation of Water for River and Wetland Ecosystem. Review of the European Community and International Environmental Law 13(1): 40–46.
  • Verzijl, J.H.W., 1970. International Law in Historical Perspective. Brill: Nijhoff.
  • Vitányi, Béla. 1979. The International Regime of River Navigation, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
  • Vučić, Mihajlo. 2017. Silala Basin Dispute: Implications for the Interpretation of the Concept of International Watercourse. Annals FLB – Belgrade Law Review. LXV(4): 91–111.
  • Vučić, Mihajlo. 2018. Mehanizmi ostvarivanja načela neuzrokovanja štete u praksi upravljanja međunarodnim vodotokovima. Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.