Samir Aličić
10.5937/AnaliPFB1701131A
ABSTRACT /
The notion of “wine vessels” in Roman law comprises all the wine-containing recipients. There is no legal standardization of wine vessels by means of volume, and although the terms amphora, urna and culleus are used to designate both the vessels and the units of measure, these are two different meanings of the terms. In regard of the question, whether the vessels make appurtenance of the wine, jurisprudents of proculean school divided them in two categories. In the first category are those that follow legal status of wine, usually amphoras and other jars (cadi) which are used for “packaging”, i. e. “bottling” of the wine. The second category make mostly vats (cuppae) and ceramic cisterns (dolia), which don’t follow legal status of wine, making instead part of farming equipment of a landed property (instrumentum fundi) and it’s appurtenance. But, the roman jurists are not consistent regarding criteria for distinguishing these two categories.
DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
REFERENCES /
- Apathy, P., „Mora accipiendi und Schadenersatz“, Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung (ZSS) 114/1984.
- Archer, M., „Imports at Ostia in the Imperial Period and Late Antiquity: The Amphora Evidence from the Dai-Aaar Excavations“, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. Supplementary Volumes. The Maritime World of Ancient Rome 6/2008.
- Astolfi, R., Studi sull’oggetto dei legati in diritto romano II, Padova 1969.
- Benitez Lopez, M. M., La venta de vino y otras mercancias en la jurisprudencia romana, Dykinson, Madrid 1994.
- BIA – Bibliotheca iuris antiqui, Sistema informativo integrati sui diritti dell’Antichità, direzione scientifica di Nicola Palazzolo, 2000.
- Blázquez Martinez, J. M., Remesal Rodríguez J., Estudios sobre el Monte Testaccio (Roma), Barcelona 2010.
- Brunella, B., „Le anfore da trasporto“, La ceramica e i materiali in età romana. Classi, produzioni, commerci e consumi (a cura di Daniela Gandolfi), Istituto internazionale di studi liguri, 2005.
- Casavola,, F., „Emptio pondere numero mensura“, Scritti giur. per il centenario della casa ed. Jovene, 1954.
- Cracco Ruggini, L., „Roma e il vino norditalico“, La mémoire perdue. Recherches sur l’administration romaine, Roma 1998.
- Eitrem, S., Amundsen, L., „Sale of Wine on Delivery P. Osl. inv. no. 1440“, Eos 48.2 [Symbolae Raphaeli Taubenschlag dedicatae II], 1957 .
- Frier, B. W., „Roman Law and the Wine trade: the Problem of ‘Vinegar Sold as Wine’“, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fuer Rechtsgeschichte (ZSS). Rom. Abt., 113/1983.
- Hanemaayer, F., „Loan of Wine“, Antidoron M. David, Lugdunum Batavarum, 1968.
- Hausmaninger H., „Zur Legatsinterpretation des Celsus“, Iura, rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico (IVRA) 35/1984.
- Iliffe J., „The Usufructuary as Plaintiff Under the Lex Aquilia According to the Classical Jurists“, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité (RIDA) 12/1965
- Jakab, É., „Garantee and Jars in Sales of Wine on Delivery“, Journal of Juristic Papyrology 29/1999b.
- Jakab É., „Ein fundus cum instrumentu legatus und der ‘Verbliebene Wein’“: Scevola D.33.7.27.3“, ZSS 119/2002.
- Jakab, É., „Periculum und Praxis: Vertragliche Abreden beim Verkauf von Wein“, ZSS 121/2004.
- Jakab, É., „Vinum effundere in Ulp. D.18.6.1.3“, Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung (ZSS) 116/1999 (a).
- Jakab, É., „Wo gärt der verkaufte Wein?“ Zur Deutung der Weinleinferungskäufe in der graeco-ägyptischen Papyri, Symposion 1997, Vortrage zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Köln−Weimar−Wien 2003.
- Jakab, É., Risikomanagement beim Weinferkauf, Periculum und praxis im Imperium Romanum, München 2009.
- Lancaster, L. C., Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome. Innovations in Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
- Manfredini, A. D., „Costantino la Tabernaria e il vino“, Accademia Romanistica Costantiniana. VII Convegno, 1985, Napoli 1988.
- Marlier, S., Sibella P., „La Giraglia, a dolia wreck of the 1st century BC from Corsica, France: Study of its hull remains“, International Journal of Nautical Archeology 2/2002.
- Maškin, N. A., Istorija starog Rima, Naučna KMD, Beograd 2005.
- Nicosia, G., „Animalia quae collo dorsove domantur“, IVRA 18/1967.
- Olszak, N., „Emptio ad gustum: la vente à la dégustation de l’antiqité à l’article 1587 du Code civil“, TR 58/1990.
- Panella, C., Tchernia, A., „Agricultural Products Transported in Amphorae: Oil and Wine“, Ancient Economy (ed. Walter Scheidel – Sitta von Reden), New York 2002.
- Patch Mckinlay, A., „Wine and the law in ancient times“, Studies Robinson 2/1953.
- Paterson, J., „Salvation from the Sea: Amphorae and Trade in the Roman West“, The Journal of the Roman Studies 72/1982.
- Peña, J. Th., Roman Pottery in the Archeological Record, Cambridge 2011.
- Pennitz, M., „Die Gefahrtragung beim Weinverkauf im klassischen römischen Recht“, Tijdschrift voor Rechtge-schiedenis (TR) 62/1994.
- Reinoso, B. F., „‘Definitio periculosa’: Javoleno o Labeon?“, Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano Vittorio Scialoja (BIDR) 90/1987.
- Sciallano, M., Sibella, P., Amphores, Comment les identifier, Aix-en Provence, 1994
- Smith, W., „Quadrantal“, A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (ed. John Murray), London 1875.
- Stolba, V. F., „Local Patterns of Trade in Wine and the Chronological Implications of Amphora Stamps“, Black Sea Studies 6/2007.
- Van Oyen, H., „Acknowledgement of a debt concerning replacement of bad wine“, Antidoron M. David, Lugdunum Batavarum, 1968.
- Von Lübtow, U., „Catos leges venditioni et locationi dictae“, EOS 48/3/1956–1957.
- White, K. D., Farm Equipment of the Roman World, Cambridge University Press, New York 1975.
- Williams, D., P. F. Peacock D., Amphorae and the Roman economy, an introductory guide, Longman Archeology Series, New York 1994.
- Yaron, R., „Sale of Wine“, Studies in the Roman Law of Sale (Dedicated to the memory of Francis de Zulueta), 1959 .
- Zazzera, S., „Brevi note sul legato di vino“, Labeo 18/1972.
© 1953 - 2024 Annals of the
Comments are closed.