Article
Dec 31
Back

THE CAPACITY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN SERBIA TO DEAL WITH ASYLUM CASES

Marko Davinić, Ivana Krstić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1804056D
ABSTRACT /

This paper explores the capacity of the Administrative Court in Serbia to adjudicate asylum cases, which have been in its jurisdiction since the Court’s establishment in 2010. The analysis of its asylum case law is divided into three phases, based on both temporal and substantive criteria. It demonstrates that the best period in handling asylum cases was 2014–2015, during which judgments of the Court significantly improved the decision-making of administrative authorities. Nevertheless, this research has identified several issues that have negatively influenced the work of the Administrative Court in the field of asylum law: the Court’s excessive inherited caseload, the influx of new claims, a small number of asylum-related cases, the insufficient number of judges, the extremely broad jurisdiction of the Court, as well as a lack of specialized panels within the Court. The last problem is identified as the major one and the authors propose concrete steps that should be undertaken in order to increase the capacity of the Administrative Court to deal with asylum cases. Lessons learned from Serbia, as a country in the middle of the Western Balkan migration route, can be useful for all other countries along it.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
English  
REFERENCES /
  • “Administrative Court – Transparency”, available at: http://www.up.sud.rs/english/transparency, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Barlai, M. et al. M. (eds.), The Migrant Crisis: European Perspectives and National Discourses, Studien zur politischen Kommunikation, LIT Verlag, Berlin–Münster–Wien–Zürich–London 2017.
  • Belgrade Center for Human Rights, Human Rights in Serbia in 2011, Belgrade 2012, available at: http://www.bgcentar.org.rs/bgcentar/eng-lat/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Human-Rights-in-Serbia-A-Comprehensive-Report-for-2011-in-Serbian-and-English-2012..pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Belgrade Center for Human Rights, Human Rights in Serbia in 2012, Belgrade 2013, available at: http://www.bgcentar.org.rs/bgcentar/eng-lat/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Human-Rights-in-Serbia-2012.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Belgrade Center for Human Rights, Right to Asylum in the Republic of Serbia in 2016, Belgrade 2017, available at: http://www.bgcentar.org.rs/bgcentar/eng-lat/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Right-to-Asylum-in-the-Republic-of-Serbia-2016-2.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Belgrade Center for Human Rights, Right to Asylum in the Republic of Serbia in 2015, Belgrade 2016, available at: http://www.bgcentar.org.rs/bgcentar/eng-lat/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Azil-2016-ENG.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Buonanno, L., “The European Migration Crisis”, in D. Dinan, N. Nugent, W. E. Paterson (eds.), The European Union in Crisis, Palgrave, London 2017, 100–129.
  • Cucić, V., “Administrative Appeal in Serbian Law”, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 32/2011, 50–73.
  • Cucić, V., “Appeals in Special Administrative Domains”, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 34/2011, 63–79.
  • Davinić, M., “The EU Enlargement and Accession Procedure – The Case of Western Balkan Countries”, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 4/2017, 513–526.
  • Davinić, M., “The Role of Public Administration of the Republic of Serbia in Managing the Migrant Crisis”, in M. M. Boguslawskij et al. (eds.), Migrationsrecht im östlichen Europa, Die Kieler Ostrechts-Notizen, Institut für Osteuropäisches Recht der Universität Kiel, Kiel 2017, 29–37.
  • European Asylum Support Office (EASO), Newsletter – May 2016, available at: https://www.easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/newsletters/EASO%20Newsletter%20May%202016%201500.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Information Bulletin of the Administrative Court, 2010–2016, Administrative Court, Belgrade 2016, available at: http://www.up.sud.rs/uploads/pages/1459337890~~Information%20Bulletin%20on%20Work%20of%20the%20Court%20March%202016.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Johnson, M., The European Migrant Crisis: Unprecedented Displacement on an International Scale, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.
  • Krstić, I., Davinić, M., “The Efficiency of Serbian Asylum Procedure”, in M. Bungenberg, T. Giegerich, T. Stein (eds.), Asyl und Migration in Europa – rechtliche Herausforderungen und perspektiven, ZeuS Sonderband 2016, Nomos, Europa Institut, Baden-Baden 2016.
  • Krstić, I., Davinić, M., “Zloupotreba koncepta sigurne treće zemlje [The Misuse of the Concept of the Safe Third Country]”, in R. Vasić, I. Krstić (eds.), Development of Serbia’s legal system and harmonization with the EU law, University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Belgrade 2013, 97–116.
  • Krstić, I., Davinić, M., Pravo na azil – medjunarodni i domaci standardi [The Right of Asylum – International and National Standards], University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Belgrade 2013.
  • Krstić, I., “Response of Western Balkan Countries to Migration Crisis”, in Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 4/2017, 527–540.
  • Lončar, Z., “Administrative Court Control in the Republic of Serbia”, in M. Lazić, S. Knežević (eds.), Legal, Social and Political Control in National, International and EU Law, University of Niš Faculty of Law, Niš 2016, 119–136.
  • McDonald-Gibson, C., Cast Away: True Stories of Survival from Europe’s Refugee Crisis, Portobello Books, London 2017.
  • Milovanović, D., Davinić, M., Cucić, V., “Efficiency of the Administrative Appeal (The Case of Serbia)”, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 37/2012, 95–111.
  • Milutinović, V., Jovanić, T., “Serbia’s New Law on Protection of Competition”, in D. Campbell (ed.), Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, 79–106.
  • Rakić, D. (ed.), Ljudska prava izbeglica, interno raseljenih lica, povratnika, azilanata i žrtava trgovine ljudima u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori [Human Rights of Refugees, Internally Displaced Persons, Returnees, Asylum Seekers and Victims of Human Trafficking in Serbia and Montenegro], Group 484, Belgrade 2006.
  • Republic of Serbia, the Supreme Court of Cassation, Godišnji izveštaj o radu sudova u Republici Srbiji za 2016 [Annual Report on the Performance of the Courts in the Republic of Serbia for 2016], March 2017, available at: http://www.vk.sud.rs, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Stojić Mitrović, M., “Serbian migration policy concerning irregular migration and asylum in the context of the EU integration process”, Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 4/2014, 1105–1120.
  • UNHCR, Hungary as a country of asylum – Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016, May 2016, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/57319d514.html, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • UNHCR, Serbia as a country of asylum, Observations on the situation of asylum-seekers and beneficiaries of international protection in Serbia, August 2012, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/50471f7e2.html, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • UNHCR, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as a country of asylum: Observations on the situation of asylum-seekers and refugees in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, August 2015, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/55c9c70e4.html, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • UNHCR, UNHCR Position on Returns to Libya – Update I, October 2015, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/561cd8804.html, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • UNHCR, Serbia Update 17–30 September 2018, available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/66098.pdf, last visited 2 October 2018.
  • Vasiljević, D., “Mandatory Character of Court Rulings and Their Execution According to New Serbian Law on Administrative Disputes”, NBP – Journal of Criminalistics and Law 3/2010, 17–25.
  • Vučetić, D., “Distinctive Features of Special Administrative Proceedings in Health Care Matters”, in M. Lazić, S. Knežević (eds.), Legal, Social and Political Control in National, International and EU Law, University of Niš Faculty of Law, Niš 2016, 179–202.