Article
Dec 31
Back

JUSTIFIED EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY (IN LEGAL INTERPRETATION)

Bojan Spaić

10.5937/AnaliPFB1804143S
ABSTRACT /

The paper analyzes one of the main influences on the results of legal interpretation – epistemic authority. An account of authority is given along with a distinction between two basic types of authority, followed by a brief explanation of practical authority. Epistemic authority and derivative epistemic authority in particular are explained, in order to propose the conditions under which the influence of epistemic authority on judicial interpretation is justified. The general conclusion of the paper is the following: A court or judge Y is rationally justified to defer to the ascription of meaning (interpretation) p to a legal text q of person X, if court or judge Y has good reasons to believe that X has more knowledge, skills, experience or training in ascribing meaning to (interpreting) q.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
English  
REFERENCES /
  • Alston, W. P., “Belief-Forming Practices and the Social”, Socializing Epistemology (ed. F. Schmitt), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland 1994.
  • Darwall, S., “Authority and Reasons: Exclusionary and Second-Personal”, Ethics 120(2)/2010.
  • De George, R.T., “The Function and Limits of Epistemic Authority”, Southern Journal of Philosophy 8(2)/1970.
  • Foley, R., “Egoism in Epistemology”, Socializing Epistemology (ed. F. Schmitt), Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland 1994.
  • Foley, R., Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001
  • Fricker, E., “Second-Hand Knowledge”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXIII(3)/2006.
  • Fricker, E., “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy”, The Epistemology of Testimony (eds. J. Lackey, E. Sosa), Oxford University Press 2006.
  • Gadamer, H.-G., Truth and Method (translated by J. Weinsheimer, D. G Marshall), Continuum, London – New York 2006.
  • Glenu, H. P., “Persuasive Authority”, McGill Law Journal 32(2)/1987.
  • Green, L., The Authority of the State, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1988.
  • Hardwig, J., “Epistemic Dependence”, The Journal of Philosophy 82(7)/1985.
  • Jäger, C., “Epistemic Authority, Preemptive Reasons, and Understanding”, Episteme 13(2)/2016.
  • K. E. Himma, “Practical Authority”, forthcoming in Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Legal Argumentation (eds. G. Bongiovanni et al.), Springer Verlag, 2018, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2957215, last visited 23 April 2017.
  • Hurd, H. M., Moral Combat, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999.
  • Lackey, J., “Introduction”, The Epistemology of Testimony (eds. J. Lackey, E. Sosa), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  • Lehrer, K., “Social Information”, The Monist 60(4)/1977.
  • Marmor, A., Social Conventions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 2009.
  • Nozick, Robert. Philosophical Explanations, Belknap Press, 1981.
  • Raz, J., Between Authority and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
  • Raz, J., Ethics in the Public Domain, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995.
  • Raz, J., Practical Reason and Norms, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  • Raz, J., The Authority of Law, Oxford University Press, New York 1979.
  • Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1988.
  • Schauer, F., “Authority and Authorities”, Virginia Law Review 94/2008.
  • Sunstein, C. R., Vermeule A., “Interpretation and Institutions”, SSRN Electronic Journal 29/2002, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=231075, last visited 28 July 2018.
  • Zagzebski, L. T., Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.