Article
Mar 31
Back

THE PERFECT SILENCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON HOW IGNORANCE AND LACK OF CRITICAL DEBATE EFFECT THE PROCESS OF ENACTING TAX LEGISLATION IN SERBIA

Svetislav V. Kostić, Danilo Vuković

10.5937/AnaliPFB1901069K
ABSTRACT /

In this paper the authors deal with the crucial question of the ability of the Serbian institutions and society to apply adequate scrutiny with respect to the enactment of tax legislation. After providing a description of the current Serbian law-making and public consultations framework, and analyzing the relevance of the transitional nature of the Serbian political environment on the approach to the business of legislating, the authors choose three case studies which lead to the conclusion that it is the lack of even basic knowledge regarding taxation, at the level of the members of parliament and the media, combined with the silence and inertness of Serbian professional circles to participate in public debates on tax policy, that is enabling many questionable norms to enter Serbian legislation without any notable opposition or deliberation. Finally, the authors propose certain measures that could improve the public consultations process.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
English  
REFERENCES /
  • Ágh, A., “Parliaments as Policy-Making Bodies in ast Central Europe: The Case of Hungary”, International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 4/1997.
  • Amenta, E., “State-Centered and Political Institutional Theory: Retrospect and Prospect” in The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization (eds. T. Janoski et al.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
  • Antonić, S., Elite, građani i slaba država, Službeni glasnik, Belgrade 2006.
  • Basic Measurement Report: The Principles of Public Administration. Serbia. OECD/SIGMA, Paris 2015.
  • Brinton, M., Nee, V. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Sociology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1998.
  • Cohen, L., Lampe, J., Embracing Democracy in the Western Balkans: From Postconflict Struggles toward European Integration, Woodrow Wilson Center Press and The Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, D.C. and Baltimore 2011.
  • Cvejić, S., (ed.), Informal Power Networks, Political Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*, SeConS, Belgrade 2016.
  • De Crouy-Chanel, E, Maitrot de la Motte, A., “France”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Del Fedreico, L., Castigione, R., Miconi, F., “Italy“, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Dourado, A.P., “General Report – In Search of Validity in Tax Law: the Boundaries Between Creation and Application in a Rule-of-Law State” in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vo. 7, 2010.
  • Džinić, J., “Public Administration Reform in Serbia”, Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava: časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave. 11/2011.
  • Erdos, G., “Depicting National Tax: Hungary”, in Tax Legislation – Standards, Trends and Challenges (eds. W. Nykiel, M. Sek), Wolters Kluwer SA, Warsaw 2015.
  • Eriksen, S., “Institution Building in Central and Eastern Europe: Foreign Influences and Domestic Responses”, Review of Central and East European Law, 32/2007.
  • Freedman, J., Managing tax complexity: the institutional framework for tax policy-making and oversight, Working Paper 15/08, Oxford University Center for Business Taxation, May 2015, 6 – 9 (available at http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/5432/1/WP1508.pdf).
  • Goetz, K. H., Zubek, R., “Government, Parliament and Law-making in Poland”, The Journal of Legislative Studies 4/2007.
  • Gribnau, H., “Netherlands”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Gribnau, H., “Equality, Legal Certainty and Tax Legislation in the Netherlands – Fundamental Legal Principles and Checks on Legislative Power: A Case Study”, 9 Utrecht L. Rev. (2013).
  • Hall, P., Taylor, R., “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Political Studies, 44/1996.
  • Heinrich, J., Prinz, I., “Austria”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Heymann, P.B., “Democracy and Corruption”, 20 Fordham Int’l L.J. (1996–1997).
  • Ilić-Popov, G., Popović, D., “Oporezivanje kapitalnih dobitaka u srpskom poreskom pravu: tri razloga za zabrinutost poreskih pravnika”, in Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija sa pravom Evropske unije (ed. S. Taboroši), University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Belgrade 2008.
  • Ilić-Popov, G., Popović, D., “Poreska struktura i korupcija”, Anali Pravnog fakulteta, 1/2014.
  • Ilić-Popov, G., Kostić, S., “Depicting National Tax Legislation: Serbia”, in Tax Legislation – Standards, Trends and Challenges, (eds. W. Nykiel and M. Sek), Wolters Kluwer SA, Warsaw 2015.
  • Jelinčić, J., Đurović, S., (eds.), Evropeizacija Srbije – Građansko društvo, Fund for Open Society, Belgrade 2011.
  • Kaminski, A., “Corruption Under the Post-Communist Transformation: The Case of Poland”, Polish Sociological Review, 2/1997.
  • Kimura, K., “Japan”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Kopecký, P., “Power to the Executive! The Changing Executive–Legislative Relations in Eastern Europe”, The Journal of Legislative Studies 10/2004.
  • Kostić, S., “Oporezivanje kapitalnih dobitaka fizičkih lica ostvarenih prodajom imovine stečene poklonom”, Pravni život, 10(II)/ 2006, 914.
  • Kostić, S., “Administrativni okvir kao ključna prepreka usklađivanju srpskog poreskog prava sa pravom Evropske unije” in Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije (2016), (ed. V. Radović) University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Belgrade 2016.
  • Kuhner, T.K., “The Corruption of Liberal and Social Democracies”, 84 Fordham L. Rev. (2015–2016).
  • Laušev, J., “Public Sector Pay Gap in Serbia during Large-Scale Privatisation, by Educational Qualification” Economic Annals, 47/2012.
  • Lazić, M., Čekajući kapitalizam, Službeni glasnik, Belgrade 2011.
  • Lazić, M., Pešić, J., Making and Unmaking State-Centered Capitalism in Serbia. Čigoja, Belgrade 2012.
  • The Mahabharata, Book 12: Santi Parva, Part I: Rajadharmanusasana Parva, Section LXXXVIII, translation by K.M. Ganguli, http://sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a087.htm, accessed on 11 February 2019.
  • Martindale, B.C. (et al.), “Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style”, 29:4 J. Bus. Comm. (1992).
  • Mendelski, M., “They Have Failed Again! Donor-Driven Promotion of the Rule of Law in Serbia”, Südosteuropa 61/2013.
  • Milovanović, D., (et al.), Studija o unapređenju zakonodavnog procesa u Republici Srbiji, Belgrade 2012 (available at http://www.transparentnost.org.rs/images/publikacije/GIZ%20srpski%20zasticena%20verzija%20(1).pdf).
  • Mössner, J.M., “Tax Legislation in Germany – Procedures, Actors, Results, Critics”, in Tax Legislation – Standards, Trends and Challenges, (eds. W. Nykiel and M. Sek), Wolters Kluwer SA, Warsaw 2015.
  • Nielsen, J. G., “Denmark”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Pajvančić, M., Parlamentarno pravo, Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Belgrade 2008.
  • Patrick Yingling, M., “Conventional and Unconventional Corruption”, 51 Duq. L. Rev. (2013).
  • Pavlović, V., Orlović, S., (eds.), Dileme i izazovi parlamentarizma, Fakultet političkih nauka i Fondacija Konrad Adenauer, Belgrade 2007.
  • Pedersen, F. H., “Advancing the Study of Tax Complexity with the Usability Model”, 12 Hous. Bus. & Tax L.J. (2011–2012).
  • Peters, B., van de Velde, E., “Belgium”, in Separation of Powers in Tax Law – 2009 EATLP Congress, Santiago de Compostela, (ed. A.P. Dourado), EATLP International Tax Series Vol. 7, 2010.
  • Pettai, V., Madise, Ü., “The Baltic Parliaments: Legislative Performance from Independence to EU Accession”, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12/2006.
  • Popović, D., Poresko pravo, University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Belgrade 2018.
  • The Principles of Tax Policy, Eight Report of Session 2010–2011, Treasury Committee of the UK House of Commons (https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtreasy/753/753.pdf, accessed 11 February 2019).
  • Rose-Ackerman, S., “Corruption and Democracy” 90 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. (1996).
  • Stojanović, D., Kaldrma i asfalt: urbanizacija i evropeizacija Beograda 1890–1914, Udruženje za društvenu istoriju, Belgrade 2008.
  • Stone, R., “Legal Design for the ‘Good Man’“, 102 Va. L. Rev. (2016).
  • Teachout, Z., “The Anti-Corruption Principle”, 94 Cornell L. Rev. (2008–2009).
  • Thuronyi, V., Comparative Tax Law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2003.
  • Verheijen, T., Rabrenovic, A., “Civil Service Development in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS: A Perfect Storm?” in Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century (eds. F. M. van der Meer, J.C.N. Raadschelders and T.A.J. Toonen), Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
  • Vukadinović, S., “Značaj i primena javnog slušanja na nacionalnom i lokalnom nivou”, Pravni zapisi, 1/2015.
  • Vukadinović, S., “Javno razmatranje u funciji prevazilaženja demokratskog deficita, javna rasprava i razgraničenje od javnog slušanja”, Pravni zapisi 1/2016.
  • Vukelić, J., “Neposredno učešće građana u donošenju odluka na lokalnom nivou vlasti u Srbiji”, Sociologija, 3/2009.
  • Vuković, D., Kako nastaju zakoni u Srbiji: uloga društvenih interesa i institucija u zakonodavnom procesu, SeConS and University of Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy Institute for Social Studies, Belgrade 2013.
  • Vuković, D., “The Role of Civil Society in Fostering Government Accountability in Contemporary Serbia: On the Limits of Depoliticized Social Activism”, Sociologija, 4/2015.
  • Vuković, D., “Capturing Resources: The Role of Professional Communities and Middle Classes in Fostering Social Reforms Within Serbia”, Sociologija, 2/2016.
  • Vuković, D., “The Hollowing Out of Institutions: Law– and Policymaking in Contemporary Serbia” in Central and Eastern European Socio-Political and Legal Transition Revisited (eds. B. Fekete and F Gárdos-Orosz), Peter Lang, 2018.
  • Vuković, D., Cvejić, S., “Attitudes to the Rule of Law in Contemporary Serbia: A Coherent Legal Culture”, Jahrbuch für Ostrecht 1/2019 (forthcoming).
  • Zelenak, L., “Complex Tax Legislation in the TurboTax Era”, 1 Columbia Journal of Tax Law (2010).
  • Žarković Rakić, J., “Kako se Srbiji dogodila visoka nejednakost u raspodeli dohotka”, MONS 1/2017, http://mons.rs/kako-se-srbiji-dogodila-visoka-nejednakost-u-raspodeli-dohotka, accessed 11 February 2019.