Article
Dec 31
Back

PERFORMER’S RIGHT TO THE SUPPLEMENTARY REMUNERATION

Vladimir Vinš

no DOI
ABSTRACT /

In this paper, the author analyzes the concept, characteristics, significance and conditions for the existence of performer’s right to the supplementary remuneration. Then, is explaining the specific position of performers which causes the need for adopting special legal rules about their protection. The paper contains and the analysis of relevant acquis communautaire because the implementing of performer’s right to the supplementary remuneration is the result of obligation of Serbian law to align with the laws of the EU. We can also see the differences in protection of the performers in the US law, as the representatives of the Anglo-Saxon system, and the continental system. Then the solution of the Draft of the Law regarding the supplementary remuneration was critically analyzed. Finally, there is an analysis of the solution of the Directive 2011/77/EU with relevant articles of the Rome Convention and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)   Serbian (lat)  
REFERENCES /
  • Angelopoulos, C., „Amended Directive extends the term of protection for performers and sound recordings“, GRUR International 11/2011.
  • Colston, C., Galloway, J., Modern Intellectual Property Law, London 20103.
  • Commission of the European communities, Impact assessment on the legal and economic situation of reformers and record producers in the European Union – Commission staff working document, Brussels 2008.
  • Dolović, K., Pravne posledice izjave volje usmerene na raskid ugovora zbog neizvršenja, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd 2014.
  • Helberger, N. et al., „Never forever: Why extending the term of protection for sound recordings is a bad idea“, http://ssrn.com/abstract=488085, 21. maj 2018.
  • Hilty, M. R. et al., „Comment by the Max-Planck Institute on the Commission’s proposal for a Directive to amend Directive 2006/116 EC of the European Parliament and Council concerning the Term of Protection for Cop-yright and Related Rights“, 2008. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288620, 21. maj 2018.
  • Kretschmer, M., „Creativity stifled? A Joined Academic Statement on the Proposed Copyright Term Extension for Sound Recordings“, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2063813, 21. maj 2018.
  • Kretschmer, M., Hardwick, P., Authors’ Earnings from Copyright and Non-Copyright Sources: A survey of 25,000 British and German writers, Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management, London – Bournemouth 2007.
  • Marković, S. M., Autorsko pravo i srodna prava, Službeni glasnik, Beograd 1999.
  • Marković, S. M., „Kolektivno ostvarivanje autorskog i srodnih prava od monopola ka konkurenciji“, Pravo i privreda 4–6/2013.
  • Marković, S. M., Popović, D. V., Pravo intelektualne svojine, Beograd 2013.
  • Ramalho, A., Lopez – Tarruella, A., Implementation of the Directive 2011/77/EU: Copyright term of protection, Brussels 2018.