Article
Dec 31
Back

CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIARY ACTIVISM IN MONTENEGRO

Hamdija Šarkinović

no DOI
ABSTRACT /

Work under the topic: „Constitutional judiciary activism in Montenegro“ analyzes the issue of relation among law and politics. Paper aims to give an answer on two questions which are considered as issues. First question, whether the existence of the constitutional judiciary and judicial activism complicates the legislative process and political life and second question where the limits of the judicial activism in Montenegro are? This paper attempts to highlight the importance of judicial activism for establishing legal security while emphasizing that the Parliament is limited in making decisions in accordance with the Constitution and the importance of the Constitutional Courts in achieving principles of constitutionality, legality and the rule of law.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)   Serbian (lat)  
REFERENCES /
  • Bačić, A., „O sudskom aktivizmu ili o političkoj ulozi sudova“, Politička misao 3/95.
  • Bačić, A., Hrvatska i izazovi konstitucionalizma, Split 2001.
  • Bačić, P., Konstitucionalizam i sudski aktivizam, Sveučilišna knjižnica, Split 2010.
  • Barak, A, The Judge in a democracy, Princeton – Oxford 2006.
  • Bekon, F., Eseji ili savjeti politički i moralni, Nova Atlantida, Kultura, Beograd 1967.
  • Capplletti, M., Cohen, W, Comparative constitutional law, Indianapolis – New York 1979.
  • Choper, J. at al., Constitutional law: Cases – Comments and questions, Minnesota 2016.
  • Dvorkin, R., Suština individualnih prava, CID, Podgorica 2001.
  • Đorđević, J., Ustavno pravo, Savremena administracija, Beo­grad 1967.
  • Farber, D., Sherry S., Judgment Calls: Principle and Politics in Constitutional Law, Oxford 2009.
  • Hill, R. T., „Sovereign immunity and the act of State doctrine: theory and policy in United States law“, The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law 1/1982.
  • Koopmans, T., Court and Political Institution, Cambrige 2003.
  • Krapac., D, Postupak pred Ustavnim sudom Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb 2014.
  • Limbah, J., Savezni ustavni sud NJemačke, IRZ, Sarajevo 2012.
  • McNair, A., Buckland W., Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline, Cambridge 1965.
  • Öhlinger, T., „The Genesis of the Austrian Model of Constitutional Review of Legislation“, Ratio Juris 2/2003.
  • Podolnjak, R., „Američki Vrhovni sud kao politička institucija: Bush vs. Gore“, Pravni vjesnik 1–2/2003.
  • Rotunda, R., Nowak, J., Young, N., Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and procedure, Oxford 1986.
  • Schoeller, H, „Ustavni sud u zaštiti ljudskih prava”, Pravo, Zagreb 24/2000.
  • Smerdel, B., Ustavno uređenje europske Hrvatske, Zagreb 2013.
  • Stojanović, D., „Ustavni sud u svetlu interpretativnih odluka u normativnoj kontroli“, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 72/ 2016.
  • Stone, G. R. at al., Constitutional law, New York 2001.
  • Vorlander, H., Ustav, ideja i historija, IRZ, Sarajevo 2012.
  • Wolfe, C., Judical activism: Bulwark of Freedom or Precarrious Security?, Oxford 1997.