Article
Dec 29
Back

LAESIO ENORMIS IN SERBIAN LAW AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER RELATED LEGAL INSTITUTES

Snežana Dabić Nikićević

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK19A
ABSTRACT /

Mihailo Konstantinović raised important issues regarding how laesio enormis should be applied and regulated in the future, given the inconsistency in the post-war judicial practice. Konstantinović supported the view that laesio enormis should be governed by an objective principle. However, in the Law on Obligations, the right to annul the contract due to obvious disparity between contract obligations exists only if the aggrieved party was mistaken about the true value of the performance when concluding the contract.

In this paper, the author raises the question whether such a shift in the regulation of laesio enormis represents an improvement or serious arguments can be raised against it. Тhe author first analyzes how laesio enormis is regulated in comparative law, and then discusses the pros and cons of regulating this legal institute according to an objective and subjective principle.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)   Serbian (lat)  
REFERENCES /
  1. Aranđelović, Svetislav. 3–4/1982. Prekomerno oštećenje prema Zakonu o obligacionim odnosima. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beo­gradu 30: 521–534.
  2. Beale, Hugh, Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson, Jacobien Rutgers, Denis Tallon, Stefan Vogenauer. 2010. Cases, Materials and Text on Contract Law. Oregon: Hart publishing.
  3. Capitant, Henri, François Terré, Yves Lequette, François Chénéde. 2015. Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence civile, Tome 2, Obligations, Contrats spéciaux, Sûretés. Paris: Dalloz.
  4. Dabić, Snežana. 2018. Dužnost obaveštavanja pri zaključenju ugovora. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  5. Ghestin, Jacques. 1971. La notion d’erreur dans le droit positif actuel. Paris: L.G.D.J.
  6. Goubeaux, Gilles. 2001. A propos de l’erreur sur le valeur. 389–404. Mélanges J. Ghestin. Paris: L.G.D.J.
  7. Hiber, Dragor. 1991. Pojam bitne zablude pri zaključenju ugovora, doktorska disertacija. Beograd.
  8. Hiber, Dragor. 2/1992. Neskrivljenost zablude. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke 48: 267–277.
  9. Konstantinović, Mihailo. 3–4/1982. Oštećenje preko polovine i zelenaški ugovori. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 30: 529–539.
  10. Konstantinović, Mihailo. 1996. Obligacije i ugovori: Skica za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima. Beograd: Službeni list SRJ.
  11. Krulj, Vrleta. 1980. Član 139. Očigledna nesrazmera uzajamnih da­vanja. 358–362. Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, knjiga prva, red. Borislav Blagojević, Vrleta Krulj. Beograd: Sa­vremena administracija.
  12. Larroumet, Christian, Sarah Bros. 2014. Traité de droit civil, Les obligations, Le contrat, Tome 3, sous la direction de Christian Larroumet. Paris: Economica.
  13. Loiseau, Grégoire. 2013. Traité de droit civil, La formation du contrat, Tome 1, réd. Jacques Ghestin, Grégoire Loiseau, Yves-Marie Serinet.
  14. Monateri, Pier Giuseppe, Musy, Alberto, Chiaves, Filippo Andrea. 2016. Italy. Wolters Kluwer.
  15. Nikšić, Saša. 2015. Croatia. Wolters Kluwer.
  16. Pavlović, Đorđe. 2014. O obveznostima i ugovorima uopšte. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
  17. Perović, Slobodan. 1980. Član 139. Očigledna nesrazmera uzajamnih davanja. 443–449. Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, knjiga prva, red. Slobodan Perović, Dragoljub Stojanović. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet.
  18. Samoy, Ilse, Tâm Dang Vu. 2011. Belgium. Wolters Kluwer.
  19. Schmidlin, Bruno. 2012a. Art. 21. Lésion. 205–214. Commentaire Romand, Code des obligations I, dir. Luc Thévenoz, Franc Werro. Bâle: Helbing Lichtenhahn.
  20. Schmidlin, Bruno. 2012b. Art. 31. Vice de consentement couvert par la ratification du contrat. 267–278. Commentaire Romand, Code des obligations I, dir. Luc Thévenoz, Franc Werro. Bâle: Helbing Lichtenhahn.
  21. Schmidt-Szalewski, Joanna. 1999. France. Wolters Kluwer.
  22. Vaquer, Antoni. 2011. Spain. Wolters Kluwer.