Article
Mar 30
Back

FROM INHERITABILITY TO NON-INHERITABILITY OF THE LEGAL DUTY OF SPOUSAL SUPPORT

Ivana Đokić

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22109A
ABSTRACT /

In accordance with the family regulations of the Republic of Serbia, the legal duty of support, among other things, ends with the death of the provider. Unlike the Serbian legislator, the legislators in some modern European legal systems have envisaged the inheritability of the legal duty of support, among others, for a divorced spouse. These essentially different approaches to regulating the issue of inheritability of the legal duty to support a divorced spouse, are the subject of the author’s attention. In addition to trying to draw a conclusion regarding which of the mentioned approaches to the legal regulation of the issue of heritability of the legal support duty fulfills entirely or largely the function of post-marital solidarity, the author considers the possibility of redesigning and amending the family and inheritance regulations of the Republic of Serbia.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)   Serbian (lat)  
REFERENCES /
  1. Babić, Ilija. 2014. Komentar Porodičnog zakona, prema stanju zakonodavstva od 1. februara 2012. godine. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  2. Deixler-Hübner, Astrid. 2015. Handbuch Familienrecht. Wien: Linde Verlag.
  3. Draškić, Marija. 2005. Porodično pravo i prava deteta. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
  4. Đokić, Ivana. 2020. Naslednopravna singularna sukcesija na osnovu zakona, doktorska disertacija, Niš.
  5. Ferrand, Frédérique. 2002. Grounds for divorce and maintenance between former spouses France. Lyon: University of Lyon.
  6. Frye, Bernhard. 2009. Die Gesamtrechtsnachfolge im Verwaltungsrecht, insbesondere im Einkommensteuerrecht. Leipziger: Habilitationsschrift.
  7. Grimaldi, Michel. 2017. Droit des successions. Paris: LexisNexis.
  8. Hlыstov, A. Pavel. 15/2019. Alimentnыe obяzatelьstva suprugov i bыvših suprugov v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniя alimentnыh obяzatelьstv členov semьi. Učenыe zapiski Tambovskogo otdeleniя RoSMU: 84–90. [Khlystov, A. Pavel. 15/2019. Alimentnye obi͡azatelʹstva suprugov i byvshikh suprugov v sisteme pravovogo regulirovanii͡a alimentnykh obi͡azatelʹstv chlenov semʹi. Uchenye zapiski Tambovskogo otdelenii͡a RoSMU: 84–90]
  9. Korolev, A. Юriй. 2003. Kommentariй k semeйnomu kodeksu Rossiйskoй Federacii (postateйnый). g. Ramenskoe (Mosk. obl.): Юsticinform. [Korolev, A. I͡uriĭ. 2003. Kommentariĭ k semeĭnomu kodeksu Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡sii (postateĭnyĭ). g. Ramenskoe (Mosk. obl.): I͡ustit͡sinform]
  10. Kovaček Stanić, Gordana. 2002. Uporedno porodično pravo. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet.
  11. Krüger, Wolfgang. 10/2018. Familienrechtliche Auskunftsansprüche im Erbrecht Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für Erbrecht und Familienrecht. ErbR: 557–560.
  12. Mairhuber, Ingrid, Sardadvar Karin. 2012. Unterhaltsrecht und Unterhaltslogik im Steuer– und Sozialrecht sowie in weiteren relevanten Rechtsbereichen. Wien: Verlag.
  13. Martiny, Dieter, Schwab Dieter. 2002. Grounds for divorce and main­tenance between former spouses Germany. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg.
  14. Reutov, I. Sergeй. 2/2009. Prava supruga, bыvšego supruga, faktičeskogo supruga pri nasledovanii. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta: 119–127. [Reutov, I. Sergeĭ. 2/2009. Prava supruga, byvshego supruga, fakticheskogo supruga pri nasledovanii. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta: 119–127]
  15. Riesenhuber, Karl, Karakostas K. Ioannis. 2009. Inhaltskontrolle Im Nationalen Und Europaischen Privatrecht: Deutsch-Griechische Perspek­tiven. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783899497465
  16. Roth, Marianne. 2002. Grounds for divorce and maintenance between former spouses Austria. Salzburg: Institut für Zivilverfahrensrecht.
  17. Sapožnikova, A. Tatяna. 9/2015. Alimentnыe obяzatelьstva suprugov i bыvših suprugov. Ogarёv-online: 1–8. [Sapozhnikova, A. Tati͡ana. 9/2015. Alimentnye obi͡azatelʹstva suprugov i byvshikh suprugov. Ogarëv-online: 1–8]
  18. Sayn, Isabelle. 5/2016. La prestation compensatoire en France. Actualidad Jurídica Iberoamericana. IDIBE: 101–122.
  19. Schlünder, Rolf. 2016. Gestaltungsspielräume im Unterhaltsrecht. Mannheim: Rechtsanwalt.
  20. Schröder, Rainer. 2014. Familienrecht. Begleitendes Skript. Berlin: Repetitorium Herbst.
  21. Sergeevna, M. Natalья, Ravilьevič Z. Rahmatulin. 1/2015. Alimentnыe pravoothošeniя bыvših suprugov i drugih členov semeй. Эpoha nauki, Naučnый žurnal na temu: Estestvennыe i točnыe nauki, Tehnika i tehnologii, Selьskohozяйstvennыe nauki, Socialьnыe nauki, Gumanitarnыe nauki: 123–126. [Sergeevna, M. Natalʹi͡a, Ravilʹevich Z. Rakhmatulin. 1/2015. Alimentnye pravootkhoshenii͡a byvshikh suprugov i drugikh chlenov semeĭ. Ėpokha nauki, Nauchnyĭ zhurnal na temu: Estestvennye i tochnye nauki, Tekhnika i tekhnologii, Selʹskokhozi͡aĭstvennye nauki, Sot͡sialʹnye nauki, Gumanitarnye nauki: 123–126]
  22. Stojanović, Nataša. 10/2005. Naslednopravna singularna sukcesija na osnovu zakona. Pravni život 2: 665–682.
  23. Stojanović, Nataša. 2011. Nasledno pravo, Niš: Pravni fakultet.