Article
Sep 26
Back

TRANSFORMATION OF THE POLIS AND TWO SOPHISTIC REFLECTIONS: PROTAGORAS AND CALLICLES

Marko Simendić

10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21303A
ABSTRACT /

By comparing Protagoras’ and Callicles’ arguments, the author outlines two accounts that respond to the questions raised by the changing social realities of 5th century BC Athens. The two sophists’ views are comprised of several complementary elements: 1) viewing humans as beings driven by pursuit of pleasures and avoidance of pain; 2) distinguishing law from nature; 3) views of morality as grounded in nature; 4) demanding that laws be adjusted to natural standards of justice and good life. A key point of disagreement can be found in Protagoras’ myth, where he distinguishes between natural principles that apply only to humans and those that pertain to the rest of the natural world. This draws an important distinction between Protagoras and Callicles: Protagoras’ democratic man seeking to influence the outcomes of collective political decision-making in an egalitarian community is contrasted by Callicles’ aristocrat who is meant to freely govern over their inferiors.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)   Serbian (lat)  
REFERENCES /
  1. Anonim Jamblihov. 2018. Anonim Jamblihov. 140–151. Sofisti, 2, prev. i prir. Aleksandra Zdravković Zistakis. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  2. Avramović, Dragutin, Ilija Jovanov. 1/2020. Relativizacija pravde kroz retoriku – Platonov dijalog „Gorgija“ kao paradigma. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 54: 245–265. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns54-23956
  3. Đurić, Miloš. 1955. Sofisti i njihov istorijski značaj. Beograd: Narodna knjiga.
  4. Đurić, Mihailo. 1958. Ideja prirodnog prava kod grčkih sofista. Beograd: Savez udruženja pravnika Jugoslavije.
  5. Barney, Rachel. 2017. Callicles and Thrasymachus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University.
  6. Berman, Scott. 2/1991. Socrates and Callicles on Pleasure. Phronesis 36: 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852891321052741
  7. Blundell, Mary Whitlock. 1989. Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586170
  8. Bonazzi, Mauro. 2000. Protagoras. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University.
  9. Cooper, John Milton. 1999. Reason and Emotion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  10. Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda. 1999. Protagoras and Antiphon: Sophistic Debates on Justice. 311–331. The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521441226.015
  11. Fleming, David. 3/2002. The Streets of Thurii: Discourse, Democracy, and Design in the Classical Polis. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 32: 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940209391232
  12. Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. 1971. A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 3, the Fifth Century Enlightenment, Part 1, the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Harris, Edward M. 2006. Law and Society in Ancient Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hussey, Edward. 2021. Protagoras on Political Technê. 15–38. Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Thomas Kjeller Johansen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641579.002
  15. Irani, Tushar. 2017. Plato on the Value of Philosophy: The Art of Argument in the Gorgias and Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855621
  16. Jordović, Ivan. 2/2009. Istorijski koreni učenja o pravu jačeg. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 57: 212–228.
  17. Kaluđerović, Željko, Dejan Donev. 1/2016. Kaliklova pleoneksija. Kom: časopis za religijske nauke 5: 105–22. https://doi.org/10.5937/kom1601105K
  18. Kerferd, George Briscoe. 1953. Protagoras’ Doctrine of Justice and Virtue in the ‘Protagoras’ of Plato. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 73: 42–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/628234
  19. Kerferd, George Briscoe. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Klosko, George. 2/1984. The Refutation of Callicles in Plato’s ‘Gorgias’. Greece and Rome 31: 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500028503
  21. Long, A. G. 2017. Socrates and Sophists. 15–27. The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, eds. Sacha Golob, Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139519267.003
  22. Nathan, A. R. 2/2017. Protagoras’ Great Speech. The Classical Quarterly 67: 380–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838817000453
  23. Nill, Michael. 1985. Morality and Self-Interest in Protagoras, Antiphon and Democritus. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320659
  24. Notomi, Noburu. 2013. A Protagonist of the Sophistic Movement? Protagoras in Historiography. 11–36. Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, ed. Johannes M. van Ophuijsen, Marlein van Raalte, Peter Stork. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251243_003
  25. Phillips, David D. 2008. Avengers of Blood: Homicide in Athenian Law and Custom From Draco to Demosthenes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  26. Platon. 1968a. Gorgija. 1–68. Protagora, Gorgija, prev. Mirjana Drašković, Albin Vilhar. Beograd: Kultura.
  27. Platon. 1968b. Protagora. 69–193. Protagora, Gorgija, prev. Mirjana Drašković, Albin Vilhar. Beograd: Kultura.
  28. Platon. 2000. Teetet. 83–184. Kratil, Teetet, Sofist, Državnik, prev. Milivoj Sironić. Beograd: Plato.
  29. Platon. 2002. Država, prev. Albin Vilhar i Branko Pavlović. Beograd: BIGZ.
  30. Raaflaub, Kurt A. 2007. Poets, Lawgivers, and the Beginnings of Political Reflection in Archaic Greece. 23–59. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds. Christopher Rowe, Malcolm Schofield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521481366.004
  31. Romilly, Jacqueline de. 1992. The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Shortridge, Andrew. 1/2007. Law and Nature in Protagoras’ Great Speech. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought 24: 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-90000105
  33. Stauffer, Devin. 4/2002. Socrates and callicles: A reading of Plato’s Gorgias. The Review of Politics 64: 627–658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500035907
  34. Woodruff, Paul. 1999. Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias. 290–310. The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521441226.014
  35. Woodruff, Paul. 2013. Euboulia As the Skill Protagoras Taught. 179–194. Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, ed. Johannes M. van Ophuijsen, Marlein van Raalte, Peter Stork. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251243_010
  36. Zdravković Zistakis, Aleksandra. 2017. Sofisti, 1. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.