Vladimir Dobrić, Katarina Jovičić
10.5937/AnaliPFB1902133D
The article focuses on legal insecurity under different forms of real estate lease contracts, present in contemporary Serbian law. Applying dogmatic and comparative legal methods, the authors explore the characteristics of domestic legal regime of real estate lease contracts, with special emphasis on possible application of rules of other nominate contracts to real estate lease contracts. In contemporary Serbian law only real estate financial leases are regulated, while other forms of real estate leases are not. Potential problems stemming from insufficient regulation are also evidenced in court decisions related to disputes originating from one of the innominate forms of real estate leases in Serbia. The analysis of these decisions points to issues causing legal insecurity under real estate lease contracts, which could be overcome through adequate amendments and supplements to the regulations. In this article, the authors propose specific solutions for regulating real estate lease contracts de lege ferenda, which the authors conclude are the best approach for overcoming the existing shortcomings.
- Berk, Johnatan i De Marzo, Peter. 2014. Corporate finance. Boston: Pearson.
- Brkić, Alaudin. 2014. Zaštita potrošača kod ugovora o finansijskom leasingu. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Zenici 14: 275–326.
- Cary, William. 1948. Corporate Financing Through the Sale and Lease-Back of Property:
- Business, Tax, and Policy Considerations. Harvard Law Review 62: 1–41.
- Eichwald, Denis. 2012. Financing real estate – concepts and collateralization. 77–100 u Real estate investmenst in Germany, ed. Michael Mütze, Thomas Senff, Jutta C. Möller. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Hodge, Steven. 1986. Sale-leaseback, a search for economic substance. Indiana Law Journal 61: 721–756.
- Kangas, Tanja. 2009. Privity on Contract in Financial Leasing. Helsinki Law Review 3: 69–100.
- Kronke, Herbert. 2011. Financial leasing and its unification by UNIDROIT– General report. Uniform Law Review, Revue de Droit Uniforme 16: 23–44.
- Laušević, Ljubica. 2014. Povratni lizing – alternativni izvor povećanja obrtnog kapitala preduzeća. Bankarstvo br. 1/2014: 30–63.
- Ling, Nur Lesya Firsia Johaimi. 2012. Analysis of factors and the impacts of sale and leaseback. Procedia – Soci-al and Behavioral Sciences 36: 502–510.
- Mäntysaari, Peter. 2010. The Law of corporate finance: General principles and EU law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Sprin-ger.
- McPherson, John. 1949. Some economic and legal aspects of the purchase and lease of real estate by life insuran-ce company. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 97: 482–501.
- Organek, Joel., Partyka Robert i Scott Bruce. 1968. Financing business activity through sale and leaseback of real property – A Comment. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 6: 294–304.
- Perović, Jelena. 2003. Komentar Zakona o finansijskom lizingu. Beograd: Glosarijum.
- Ross, Steven. Westerfield Randolph. i Jaffe Jeffrey. 2002. Corporate finance. 6. ed. New York: Mac Grow Hill/ Irving.
- Shurtz, Nancy. 1982. A Decision model for lease parties in sale leasebacks of real estate. William and Mary Law Review 23: 385–438.
- Simonović, Dragoljub. 2009. Ugovorna čitanka. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
- Spasić, Ivanka. 1990. Ugovor o leasingu. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo u Beogradu.
- Toth Arpad. 2017. Lease regulation and future trends in Hungary, (pristupljeno 30. aprila 2019). https://kgk.sze.hu/images/dokumentumok/kautzkiadvany2017/Toth_Kautz_2017.pdf (pristupljeno 2. juna 2019).
- Vasiljević, Mirko. 2000. Poslovno pravo. Beograd: Savremena administracija.
- Vernimmen, Pierre. Quiry Pascal, Dallocchio Maurizio, Le Fur Yann i Salvi Antonio. 2005.
- Corporate finance, Theory & practice. West Sussex: Willey.
- Wang, Jiazhuo i Yang, Juan. 2016. Financing without bank loans, new alternatives for funding SMEs in China. Singapore: Springer.
- Whitby, Ryan. 2013. Market responses to sale and leasebacks. Real Estate Finance 29: 1–7.
- Wilson, John. 1953. Sale and lease-back – A Re-Appraisal. Case Western Reserve Law Review 4: 318–335.
Comments are closed.