Article
Aug 31
Back

EU ACCESSION TO THE ECHR – ENLARGING THE HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN EUROPE

Ivana Krstić, Bojana Čučković

10.5937/AnaliPFB1602049K
ABSTRACT /

This paper deals with the importance of the EU accession to the ECHR, as the most significant regional instrument for human rights protection. The paper outlines the evolution of the idea of ​​the accession to the ECHR, different stages of that process, as well as a Draft agreement which attempted to resolve some complex legal issues relating to the specific nature of the EU legal system. In the second part of this paper, the Opinion 2/13 of the CJEU from December 2014 has been analyzed, which basically interrupted the entire accession process. It is noted that currently the ECtHR has only an indirect constitutional control over the EU’s legal order by examining laws of the Member States. The EU accession to the ECHR would allow examination of all acts and measures in the EU from the human rights perspective, including those over which the CJEU does not have full oversight function.

Therefore, the authors argue that due to the establishment of legal certainty and external control over acts of the EU institutions, it is necessary to find a way for the continuation of the accession process, as soon as possible. There are two possible scenarios: a re-negotiation of the agreement on accession, or modification of the EU Treaties. Both solutions seem almost impossible in the created political milieu. However, there is a hope that negotiations will continue due to the influence of the Avotiņš judgment from May 2016 in which the ECtHR upheld the principle of equal protection from the Bosphorus case, pointing to the importance of maintaining mutual trust between two courts, as well as the need for the establishment of greater credibility and EU strengthening after Brexit.

DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE /
Serbian (cyr)  
REFERENCES /
  • Alston, P., Weiler, J., „An ‘Ever Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights“, The EU and Human Rights (ed. P. Alston), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  • Brown, N.L., McBride, J., „Observations on the Proposed Accession by the European Community to the European Convention on Human Rights“, The American Journal of Comparative Law 29/1981.
  • Canor, I., „Primus inter partes. Who is the Ultimate Guardian of Fundamental Rights in Europe?“, European Law Review 25(3)/2000.
  • Craig, P., „EU Accession to the ECHR: Competence, Procedure and Substance“, Fordham International law Journal 36/2013.
  • Davinić, M., Evropski ombudsman i loša uprava, Zaštitnik građana, Beograd 2013. (Davinić, M., Evropski ombudsman i loša uprava, Zaštitnik građana, Beograd 2013)
  • Davinić, M., „Pojam dobre uprave – između klasičnog i mekog prava“, Pravni život 10/2010. (Davinić, M., „Pojam dobre uprave – između klasičnog i mekog prava“, Pravni život 10/2010)
  • Dickson, B., „The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the case Law of the European Court of Human Rights“, European Human Rights Law Review 1/2015.
  • Drzemczewski, A., „The EU Accession to the ECHR: The negotiation Process“, The EU Accession to the ECHR (eds. V. Kosta, N. Skoutaris, V. Tzevelekos), Oxford – Portland 2014.
  • Eeckhout, P., „Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR and Judicial Dialogue: Autonomy or Autarky?“, Fordham International Law Journal 38/2015.
  • Gragl, P., „Strasbourg’s External Review after the EU’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: A Subordination of the Luxembourg Court?“, Tilburg Law Review 17/2012.
  • Kokkot, J., Sobotta, C., „The Kadi case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance“, The European Journal of International Law 23(4)/2012.
  • Kreen, C., „Autonomy and Effectiveness as Common Concerns: A Path to ECHR Accession after Opinion 2/13“, German Law Journal 16(1)/2015.
  • Kuhnert, K., „Bosphorus – Double Standards In European human rights protection?“, Utrecht Law Review 2(2)/2016.
  • Lambrecht, S., „The Sting is in the Tail: CJEU Opinion 2/13 objects to draft agreement on accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights“, Human Rights Law Review 2/2015.
  • Lind, A.-S., Strand, M., „A New Proportionality test for Fundamental Rights?“, European Policy Analysis, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2011.
  • Moriarty, B., „EC Accession to the ECHR“, Hibernian Law Journal 3(1)/2002.
  • Odermatt, J., „A Giant Steps Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights“, Working paper no. 150, February 2015, Leuven Center for Global Governance Studies.
  • Odermatt, J., „The EU’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: An International law Perspective“, International Law and Politics 2014.
  • O’Meara, N., „A More Secure Europe of Rights? The European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and EU Accession to the ECHR“, German Law Journal 14(10)/2011.
  • Paunović, M., Krivokapić, B., Krstić, I., Međunarodna ljudska prava, Pravni fakultet, Beograd 2016. (Paunović, M., Krivokapić, B., Krstić, I., Međunarodna ljudska prava, Pravni fakultet, Beograd 2016)
  • Paunović, M., Krstić, I., „Povelja o osnovnim pravima u EU“, Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke 4/2000. (Paunović, M., Krstić, I.,“Povelja o osnovnim pravima u EU“, Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke 4/2000)
  • Peers, S., „The EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The dream Becomes a Nightmare“, German Law Journal 16(1)/2014.
  • Peers, S. et al. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights – a Commentary, Hart Publishing, Luxembourg 2014.
  • Saiz Arnaiz, A., Torres Péres, A., Main trends in the recent case law o f the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights in the field of fundamental rights, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Study, Brussels 2012.
  • Schermers, H.G., „The European Community Bound by Fundamental Human Rights“, Common Market Law Review 27/1990.
  • Schermers, H.G., „The European Communities under the European Convention on Human Rights“, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 5 (1)/1978.
  • Schorkopf, F., „The European Court of Human Rights’ Judgment in the case of Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm v. Ireland“, German Law Journal 6(9)/2005.
  • Spaventa, E., „A Very Fearful Court? The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union after Opinion 2/13“, Maastricht Journal 1/2015.
  • Timmermans, C., „The ‘Co-respondent Mechanisms’ According to the Draft Agreement for the Accession of the EU to the ECHR“, The EU Accession to the ECHR (eds. V. Kosta, N. Skoutaris, V. P. Tzevelekos), Oxford – Portland 2014.
  • Torres Pérez, A., „Too Many Voices? The Prior Involvement of the Court of Justice of the European Union“, The EU Accession to the ECHR (eds. V. Kosta, N. Skoutaris, V. P. Tzevelekos), Oxford and Portland 2014.
  • Toth, A. G., „The European Union and Human Rights: The Way Forward“, Common Market Law Review 34.
  • Van de Heyning, C., „No Place Like Home  Discretionary Space for the Domestic Protection of Fundamental Rights“, Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (eds. P. Popelier, C. Van de Heyning, P. Van Nuffel), Intersentia, Cambridge 2011.
  • Vogiatzis, N., „The Right to Extra-Judicial redress in EU Law after the EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The Legal Framework, Challenges and the Question of the Prior Involvement of the CJEU“, The EU Accession to the ECHR (eds. V. Kosta, N. Skoutaris, V. Tzevelekos), Oxford – Portland 2014.
  • White, S., „The EU’s Accession to the Convention on Human Rights: A New Era of Closer Cooperation between the Council of Europe and the EU?“, New Journal of European Criminal Law 1(2)/2010.